Quantifying heart rate dynamics using different approaches of symbolic dynamics

Abstract

The analysis of symbolic dynamics applied to physiological time series is able to retrieve information about dynamical properties of the underlying system that cannot be gained with standard methods like e.g. spectral analysis. Different approaches for the transformation of the original time series to the symbolic time series have been proposed. Yet the differences between the approaches are unknown. In this study three different transformation methods are investigated: (1) symbolization according to the deviation from the average time series, (2) symbolization according to several equidistant levels between the minimum and maximum of the time series, (3) binary symbolization of the first derivative of the time series. Furthermore, permutation entropy was used to quantify the symbolic series. Each method was applied to the cardiac interbeat interval series RR i and its difference ΔRR I of 17 healthy subjects obtained during head-up tilt testing. The symbolic dynamics of each method is analyzed by means of the occurrence of short sequences (“words”) of length 3. The occurrence of words is grouped according to words without variations of the symbols (0V%), words with one variation (1V%), two like variations (2LV%) and two unlike variations (2UV%). Linear regression analysis showed that for method 1 0V%, 1V%, 2LV% and 2UV% changed with increasing tilt angle. For method 2 0V%, 2LV% and 2UV% changed with increasing tilt angle and method 3 showed changes for 0V% and 1V%. Furthermore, also the permutation entropy decreased with increasing tilt angle. In conclusion, all methods are capable of reflecting changes of the cardiac autonomic nervous system during head-up tilt. All methods show that even the analysis of very short symbolic sequences is capable of tracking changes of the cardiac autonomic regulation during head-up tilt testing.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    M. Malik, et al., Circulation 93, 1043 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    G.G. Berntson, et al., Psychophysiology 34, 623 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    S. Akselrod, et al., Science 213, 220 (1981)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    J. Kurths, et al., Chaos 5, 88 (1996)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    N. Wessel, et al., Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos. 17, 3325 (2007)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    A. Voss, et al., Cardiovasc. Res. 31, 419 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    A. Suhrbier, et al., Chaos 20, 045124 (2010)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    M.M. Kabir, et al., Ann. Biomed. Eng. 39, 2604 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    A. Porta, et al., IEEE Trans Biomed. Eng. 48, 1282 (2001)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    S. Guzzetti, et al., Circulation 112, 465 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    A. Porta, et al., Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 293, H702 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    D. Cysarz, et al., Am. J. Physiol. Heart. Circ. Physiol. 278, H2163 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    J.W. Kantelhardt, et al., Phys. Rev. E 65, 051908 (2002)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    D. Cysarz, et al., Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 292, R368 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    C. Cammarota, E. Rogora, Phys. Rev. E 74, 042903 (2006)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    D. Cysarz, et al., Comp. Biol. Med. 42, 313 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    P. Guzik, et al., J. Electrocardiol 45 70 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    U. Meyerfeldt, et al., Int. J. Cardio. 84, 141 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    R. Huhle, et al., Physiol. Meas. 33, 207 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    C. Bandt, B. Pompe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 174102 (2002)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    W.H. Cooke, et al., J. Physiol. 517, 617 (1999)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    R. Furlan, et al., Circulation 101, 886 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    E. Tobaldini, et al., IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 28, 79 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Cysarz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cysarz, D., Porta, A., Montano, N. et al. Quantifying heart rate dynamics using different approaches of symbolic dynamics. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 222, 487–500 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2013-01854-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Tilt Angle
  • European Physical Journal Special Topic
  • Symbolic Sequence
  • Permutation Entropy
  • Interbeat Interval