The European Physical Journal Special Topics

, Volume 214, Issue 1, pp 325–346 | Cite as

Manifesto of computational social science

  • R. Conte
  • N. Gilbert
  • G. Bonelli
  • C. Cioffi-Revilla
  • G. Deffuant
  • J. Kertesz
  • V. Loreto
  • S. Moat
  • J. -P. Nadal
  • A. Sanchez
  • A. Nowak
  • A. Flache
  • M. San Miguel
  • D. Helbing
Open Access
Regular Article

Abstract

The increasing integration of technology into our lives has created unprecedented volumes of data on society’s everyday behaviour. Such data opens up exciting new opportunities to work towards a quantitative understanding of our complex social systems, within the realms of a new discipline known as Computational Social Science. Against a background of financial crises, riots and international epidemics, the urgent need for a greater comprehension of the complexity of our interconnected global society and an ability to apply such insights in policy decisions is clear. This manifesto outlines the objectives of this new scientific direction, considering the challenges involved in it, and the extensive impact on science, technology and society that the success of this endeavour is likely to bring about.

Graphical abstract

References

  1. 1.
    D. Helbing, S. Balietti, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 195, 3 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Y. Song, L. Zhang, C.L. Giles, ACM Transactions on the Web 5 4(2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. Helbing, J. Jost, D. Lane, Adv. Complex Syst. 11, 485 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. Richerson, R. Boyd, J. Social Biological Struct. 1, 127 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J.C. Chesnais, The Demographic Transition: Stages, Patterns, and Economic Implications: A Longitudinal Study of Sixty-Seven Countries Covering the Period 1720–1984 (Oxford University Press, 1993)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.P. Onnela, J. Saramäki, J. Hyvonen, G. Szabó, D. Lazer, K. Kaski, J. Kertész, A.L. Barabási, PNAS 104, 7332 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    D.V. Balcan, B. Colizza, H. Goncalves, J.J. Ramasco, A. Vespignani, PNAS USA 106, 21484 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Karsai, M. Kivelä, R.K. Pan, K. Kaski, J. Kertész, A.L. Barabási, J. Saramäki, Phys. Rev. E 83, 1 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. Lazer, A. Pentland, L. Adamic, S. Aral, A. Barabási, D. Brewer, N. Christakis, N. Contractor, J. Fowler, M. Gutmann, T. Jebara, G. King, D. Roy, M.W. Macy, M. Van Alystyn, Science 323, 721 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    T.C. Schelling, J. Math. Sociol. 1, 143 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    L. Putterman, Science 328, 578 (2010)MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. Helbing, S. Bishop, R. Conte, P. Lukowicz, J.B. McCarthy, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 214, 11 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Henrich, J. Ensminger, R. McElreath, A. Barr, C. Barrett, A. Bolyanatz, J.C. Cardenas, M. Gurven, E. Gwako, N. Henrich, C. Lesorogol, F. Marlowe, D. Tracer, J. Ziker, Science 327, 1480 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    H. Peyton Young, Social Norms and Norm Dynamics (Princeton University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J.M. Epstein, Comput. Econom. 18, 9 (2001)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    C. Bicchieri, The grammar of society: the nature and dynamics of social norms (Cambridge University Press, 2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    E. Ullman-Margalit, Erkenntnis 11, 143 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. Schotter, The Economic Theory of Social Institutions (Cambridge University Press, 2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    J.M. Epstein, PNAS 99, 7243 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. Mauss, The Gift: forms and functions of exchange in archaic societies (Routledge, London 1922)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    J. Rouchier, M. O’Connor, F. Bousquet, J. Artificial Soc. Social Simulation 4 (2001)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    A.S. Golder, B.A. Huberman, J. Information Sci. 32, 198 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    C. Cattuto, V. Loreto, L. Pietronero, PNAS USA 104, 146 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    C. Cattuto, A. Barrat, A. Baldassarri, G. Schehr, V. Loreto, PNAS USA 106, 10511 (2009)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    M.A. Nowak, K. Sigmund, Nature 393, 573 (1998)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    K. Walker, Corporate Reputation Review 12, 357 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    J.J. Ebbers, N.M. Wijnberg, Strategic Organization 8, 255 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    R. Axelrod, The Evolution of Cooperation (Basic Books, New York, 1984), p. 1Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    W. Raub, J. Weesie, Amer. J. Sociol. 96, 626 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    D. Vinković, A. Kirman, PNAS 103, 19261 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    W.A. Clark, M. Fossett, PNAS USA 105, 4109 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    L. Gauvin, J. Vannimenus, J.P. Nadal, Eur. Phys. J. B – Condensed Matter and Complex Systems 70, 293 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    N. Gilbert, R. Conte (eds.), Artificial Societies: the Computer Simulation of Social Life (University College London Press, 1995)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    N. Gilbert, R. Conte Artificial Societies: The Computer Simulation of Social Life (University College London Press, London, 1995), p. 144Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    D. Dennett, Times Literary Supplement 25, 3 (1995)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    S. Havlin, D.Y. Kenett, E. Ben-Jacob, A. Bunde, R. Cohen, H. Hermann, J.W. Kantelhardt, J. Kertsz, S. Kirkpatrick, J. Kurths, Y. Portugali, S. Solomon, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 214, 273 (2012)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    J.M. Pujol, A. Flache, J. Delgado, R. Sanguessa, J. Artificial Soc. Social Simulation 8, 41 (2005)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    C. Alós-Ferrer, G. Kirchsteiger, Economic Theory 44, 339 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    A. Yasutomi, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 82, 180 (1995)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    R.L. Axtell, J.M. Epstein, J.S. Dean, G.J. Gumerman, A.C. Swedlund, J. Harburger, S. Chakravarty, R. Hammond, J. Parker, M. Parkeraj, PNAS 4, 7275 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    L.E. Cederman, Emergent Actors in World Politics: How States and Nations Develop (Princeton University Press, 1997)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    R. Axelrod, Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 80, 1095 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    S. Sen, S. Airiau, Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artifical intelligence (ACM, Hyderabad, 2007), p. 1507Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    R. Hegselmann, O. Will, Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Multi-agent-based simulation (Springer-Verlag, Berlin 2010), p. 123Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    D. Lewis, Convention. A Philosophical Study (Harvard University Press, 1969)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    N.J. Saam, A. Harrer, J. Artificial Soc. Social Simulation 2 (1999)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    M. Xenitidou, B. Edmonds (eds.), Dynamic View of Norms (Cambridge University Press, forthcoming)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    R. Conte, G. Andrighetto, M. Campenn (eds.), Minding Norms (Oxford University Press, forthcoming)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    W.B. Arthur, Handbook of Comput. Econom., 2: Agent-Based Comput. Econom. (Elsevier, 2005), p. 1551Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    W.B. Arthur, Amer. Econom. Rev. 84, 406 (1994)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    M.W. Macy, A. Flache, PNAS USA 99, 7229 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    J.M. Epstein, Generative Social Science: Studies in Agent-Based Computational Modeling (Princeton University Press, 2007)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    J.M. Galán, L.R. Izquierdo, S.S. Izquierdo, J.I. Santos, R. del Olmo, A. López-Paredes, B. Edmonds, J. Artificial Soc. Social Simul. 12, 1 (2009)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    N.A. Christakis, J.H. Fowler, N. Engl. J. Med. 357, 370 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    R. Lyons, Stat. Politics Policy 2, 2 (2011)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    T.A.B. Snijders, G.G. Van de Bunt, C.E.G. Steglich, Social Networks 32, 44 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    P.L. Borrill, L. Testfatsion, The Elgar Companion to Recent Economic Methodology (Edward Elgar Publishers, New York, 2011), p. 228Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    F. Darema, Applications Systems, Proc. IEEE 93, 692 (2005)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Y. Benkler, Yale Law J. 112, 369 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    D.C. Brabham, Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 14, 75 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    A. Kittur, E.H. Chi, B. Suh, Proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (ACM, New York, 2008), p. 453Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    N. Kiukkonen, J. Blom, O. Dousse, D. Gatica-Perez, J. Laurila, Proceedings of International Conference on Pervasive Services (ACM, Berlin, 2010)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    N. Lane, E. Miluzzo, H. Lu, D. Peebles, T. Choudhury, A. Campbell, IEEE Communications 48, 140 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    R. Conte, B. Edmonds, S. Moss, R.K. Sawyer, Comput. Math. Organization Theory 7, 183 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    V.M. Eguíluz, M.G. Zimmermann, C.J. Cela-Conde, M. San Miguel, Amer. J. Scociol. 110, 977 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    J.S. Sichman, R. Conte, Comput. Math. Organization Theory 8 (2002)Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    G. Ehrhardt, M. Marsili, F. Vega-Redondo, Phys. Rev. E 74, 1 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    C. Castelfranchi, R. Conte, Microsimulation and the social science (Springer-Verlag, 1996), p. 394Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    G.P. Huber, Organization Science 2, 88 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    G. Ritzer (ed.), Frontiers of Social Theory: The New Syntheses (Columbia University Press, 1990), p. 1Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    F.C. Billari, T. Fent, A. Prskawetz, J. Scheffran, Agent-Based Computational Modelling Applications in Demography, Social, Economic and Environmental Sciences (Physica Verlag-Springer, Heidelberg, 2006)Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    M. Assen, V. Buskens, R. Werner, J. Math. Sociol. 35 (2011)Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    R. Putnam, Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community (Simon & Schuster, 2001)Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    H. Farrell, J. Knight, Politics & Society 31, 537 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    M. Shadnam, T.B. Lawrence, Business Ethics Quarterly 21, 379 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    R. Axelrod, J. Conflict Resol. 41, 203 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    D. Centola, J.C. González-Avella, V.M. Eguíluz, M. San Miguel, J. Conflict Resol. 51, 905 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    A. Flache, M.W. Macy, J. Conflict Resol. 55, 970 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    J.C. González-Avella, M.G. Cosenza, K. Klemm, V.M. Eguíluz, M. San Miguel, J. Artificial Social Simul. 10, 1 (2007)Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    X. Castello, F. Vazquez, V.M. Eguiluz, L. Loureiro-Porto, M. San Miguel, L. Chapel, G. Deffuant, Viability and Resilience of Complex Systems. Concepts, Methods and Case Studies from Ecology and Society (Springer Verlag, 2011), p. 49Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    D. Helbing, W. Yu, H. Rauhut, J. Math. Sociol. 35, 177 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    J. Grujic, C. Fosco, L. Araujo, J.A. Cuesta, A. Sanchez, PLoS ONE 5, e13749 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    W.S. Bainbridge, Science 317, 472 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    L. Habib, W. Line, Mind, Culture Activity 14, 266 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    R. Dunbar, Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Rev. 6, 178 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    R. Conte, M. Paolucci, Reputation in artificial societies. Social beliefs for social control (Kluwer, 2002)Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    R. Conte, M. Paolucci, J. Sabater Mir, Adv. Complex Syst. 11, 303 (2008)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    F. Giardini, R. Conte, Simulation 88, 18 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    M. Paolucci, T. Eymann, W. Jager, J. Sabater-Mir, R. Conte, S. Marmo, S. Picascia, W. Quattrociocchi, T. Balke, S. Koenig, T. Broekhuizen, D. Trampe, M. Tuk, I. Brito, I. Pinyol, D. Villatoro, Social Knowledge for e-Governance: Theory and Technology of Reputation (ISTC-CNR, Rome 2009)Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    R. Falcone, C. Castelfranchi, Trust Theory: A Socio-Cognitive and Computational Model (Wiley, 2010)Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    G.A. Akerlof, R.J. Shiller, Animal Spirits: How Human Psychology Drives the Economy, and Why It Matters for Global Capitalism (Princeron University Press, 2009), p. 1Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    W.C. Salmon, Four Decades of Scientific Explanation (Pittsburgh University Press, 1989)Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    M. Weisberg, When less is more: Tradeoffs and idealization in model building (Stanford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    R.A. Fisher, The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection (Clarendon, 1930)Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    J.M. Epstein, Complexity 4, 41 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    F. Squazzoni (ed.), Epistemological Aspects of Computer Simulation in the Social Sciences (Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, 2009), p. 29Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    D. Helbing, Sci. Culture 76, 315 (2010)Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    J. Lorenz, H. Rauhut, F. Schweitzer, D. Helbing, PNAS USA 108, 9020 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    H. Gintis, The Bounds of Reason (Princeton University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    M. San Miguel, J. Johnson, J. Kertesz, K. Kaski, A. Daz-Guilera, R.S. MacKay, V. Loreto, P. Erdi, D. Helbing, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 214, 245 (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Conte
    • 1
  • N. Gilbert
    • 2
  • G. Bonelli
    • 1
  • C. Cioffi-Revilla
    • 3
  • G. Deffuant
    • 4
  • J. Kertesz
    • 5
  • V. Loreto
    • 6
  • S. Moat
    • 7
  • J. -P. Nadal
    • 8
  • A. Sanchez
    • 9
  • A. Nowak
    • 10
  • A. Flache
    • 11
  • M. San Miguel
    • 12
  • D. Helbing
    • 13
  1. 1.ISTC-CNRRomeItaly
  2. 2.CRESSUniversity of SurreySurreyUK
  3. 3.Center for Social ComplexityGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA
  4. 4.National Research Institute of Science and Technology for Environment and Agriculture (IRSTEA)ParisFrance
  5. 5.Institute of PhysicsBudapest University of Technology and EconomicsBudapestHungary
  6. 6.Sapienza University of RomeRomeItaly
  7. 7.University College LondonLondonUK
  8. 8.CNRSParisFrance
  9. 9.GISCCarlos III University of MadridMadridSpain
  10. 10.Center for Complex SystemsUniversity of WarsawWarsawPoland
  11. 11.ICSUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
  12. 12.IFISC (CSIC-UIB)Campus Universitat Illes BalearsPalma de MallorcaSpain
  13. 13.ETH ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations