The European Physical Journal Special Topics

, Volume 214, Issue 1, pp 153–181 | Cite as

FuturICT — The road towards ethical ICT

  • J. van den Hoven
  • D. Helbing
  • D. Pedreschi
  • J. Domingo-Ferrer
  • F. Gianotti
  • M. Christen
Open Access
Regular Article

Abstract

The pervasive use of information and communication technology (ICT) in modern societies enables countless opportunities for individuals, institutions, businesses and scientists, but also raises difficult ethical and social problems. In particular, ICT helped to make societies more complex and thus harder to understand, which impedes social and political interventions to avoid harm and to increase the common good. To overcome this obstacle, the large-scale EU flagship proposal FuturICT intends to create a platform for accessing global human knowledge as a public good and instruments to increase our understanding of the information society by making use of ICT-based research. In this contribution, we outline the ethical justification for such an endeavor. We argue that the ethical issues raised by FuturICT research projects overlap substantially with many of the known ethical problems emerging from ICT use in general. By referring to the notion of Value Sensitive Design, we show for the example of privacy how this core value of responsible ICT can be protected in pursuing research in the framework of FuturICT. In addition, we discuss further ethical issues and outline the institutional design of FuturICT allowing to address them.

Graphical abstract

References

  1. 1.
    O. Abul, F. Bonchi, F. Giannotti, IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Eng. 22, 1709 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Appiah, Stereotypes Shaping Identity California Law Rev. 88, 41 (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Y. Benkler, H. Nissenbaum, J. Political Philosophy 4, 394 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Benn, A Theory of Freedom (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    I. Berlin, Four Essays on Liberty (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1969)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    d.[sic] boyd, K. Crawford, Symposium on the Dynamics of the Internet and Society, September 2011 (available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1926431) (2011)
  7. 7.
    S. Buckingham Shum, K. Aberer, A. Schmidt, S. Bishop, P. Lukowicz, S. Anderson, Y. Charalabidis, J. Domingue, S. de Freitas, I. Dunwell, B. Edmonds, F. Grey, M. Haklay, M. Jelasity, A. Karpistenko, J. Kohlhammer, J. Lewis, J. Pitt, R. Sumner, D. Helbing, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 214, 109 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Christen, J. Fischer, M. Huppenbauer, C. Tanner, C. van Schaik (eds.), Empirically Informed Ethics. Morality Between Facts and Norms (Springer, New York, in press)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    T. Craig, M.E. Ludloff, Privacy and Big Data (O’Reilly, Sebastopol, 2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J.W. DeCew, In Pursuit of Privacy: Law, Ethics, and the Rise of Technology (Cornell University Press, Ithaca NY, 1997)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    P.B. De Laat, in Proceedings AISB/IACAP 2012, Stream Social Turn (available at http://events.cs.bham.ac.uk/turing12/proceedings/11.pdf#page=67) (2012)
  12. 12.
    E. Diener, R. Crandall, Ethics in Social and Behavioral Research (University of Chicago Press, Chicago IL, 1978)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Domingo-Ferrer, Proceedings of the 2010 international conference on Privacy in statistical databases (PSD’10), edited by J. Domingo-Ferrer, E. Magkos (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2010), p. 258Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. Eckersley, How Unique Is Your Web Browser? (Electronic Frontier Foundation, 2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    B. Friedman (ed.), Human values and the design of computer technology (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1997)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    B. Friedman, N.G. Freier, Theories of information behavior: A researcher’s guide edited by K.E. Fisher, S. Erdelez, E.F. McKechnie (Information today, Medford NJ, 2005), p. 368Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    B.C.M. Fung, K. Wang, R. Chen, P.S. Yu, ACM Computing Surveys 42, Article No. 14 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    F. Giannotti, D. Pedreschi, S. Pentland, P. Lukowicz, D. Kossmann, J. Crowley, D.A Helbing, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 214, 49 (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    F. Giannotti, G. Pedreschi, Mobility, Data Mining and Privacy – Geographic Knowledge Discovery (Springer, Berlin, 2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    S. Gutwirth, R. Leenes, P. De Hert, Y. Poullet (eds.), European Data Protection: In Good Health? (Springer, New York, 2012)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    D. Helbing, S. Bishop, R. Conte, P. Lukowicz, J.B. McCarthy, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 214, 11 (2012)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    D. Helbing, S. Balietti, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 195, 3 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    D. Helbing, I. Farkas, T. Vicsek, Nature 407, 487 (2000)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    A. Hundepool, J. Domingo-Ferrer, L. Franconi, S. Giessing, E. Schulte Nordholt, K. Spicer, P.-P. de Wolf, Statistical Disclosure Control (Wiley, Chichester UK, 2012)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    ICT Advisory Group Report of the ICT Advisory Group (ISTAG) European Challenges and Flagships. 2020 and beyond. (ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/fp7/ict/docs/fet-proactive/press-17_en.pdf, 2009, Retrieved 9-7-2011)
  26. 26.
    A. Janc, L. Olejnik, Feasibility and Real-World Implications of Web Browser History Detection (http://w2spconf.com/2010/papers/p26.pdf, 2010, Retrieved 12-9-2012)
  27. 27.
    R.K. Merton, The Sociology of Science. Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1973)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    A. Monreale, Privacy by Design in Data Mining, Ph.D. thesis, University of Pisa, 2011Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    A. Monreale, G.L. Andrienko, N.V. Andrienko, F. Giannotti, D. Pedreschi, S. Rinzivillo, S. Wrobel, Trans. Data Privacy 3, 91 (2010)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    N. Monteiro No Privacy, no poetry, no progress (Department of Political Science, University of Chicago, Political Theory Workshop, 18 October 2004. www.pwt.uchicago.edu/monteiro002.pdf)
  31. 31.
    B. Moore, Privacy: Studies in Social and Cultural History (M.E. Sharpe, New York, 1984)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    D. Nagel, M. Rath, M. Zimmer (eds.), Ethics of Secrecy (Special issue of International Review of Information Ethics 17, 2012)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    T. Nagel, Philosophy Public Affairs 27, 3 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    H. Nissenbaum, Washington Law Rev. 79, 119 (2004)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    T.D. Perry, Professional Philosophy. What it is and Why it Matters (D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, 1986)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice (The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 1971)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    B. Roessler, The Value of Privacy (Polity Press, Cambridge, 2004)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    S. Ruggieri, D. Pedreschi, F. Turini, ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data 4, Article 9 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    S. Ruggieri, D. Pedreschi, F. Turini, ACM International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD 2010), 1127 (2010)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    F.D. Schoeman, Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology (Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, 1984)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    J. Smart, M. Scott, J.B. McCarthy, K.T. Tan, P. Argyrakis, S. Bishop, R. Conte, S. Havlin, M. San Miguel, D. Stauffacher, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 214, 635 (2012)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    J.F.C. Timmermans, R. Heersmink, M.J. van den Hoven, Ethical Issues of Emerging ICT Applications (ETICA Workpackage 2, Deliverable 2.2, http://moriarty.tech.dmu.ac.uk:8080/index.jsp?page=10525, 2010)
  43. 43.
    M.J. Van den Hoven, Austr. J. Prof. Appl. Ethics 1, 30 (1999)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    M.J. Van den Hoven, E. Rooksby, Information technology and moral philosophy, edited by M.J. van den Hoven, J. Weckert (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008), p. 376Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    M.J. Van den Hoven, in The Cambridge. Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics edited by F. Luciano (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2010), p. 59Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    M.J. Van den Hoven, Informationage 7, 4 (2005)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    M.J. Van den Hoven, G.J.C. Lokhorst, I.R. Van de Poel, Sci. Eng. Ethics 18, 143 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Van den Hoven, Information Technology and Moral Philosophy, edited by J. Van den Hoven, J. Weckert (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009), p. 301Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    J.D. Velleman, Self to Self. Selected essays (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    M. Walzer, Spheres of Justice (Blackwell, Oxford, 1983)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    G. Wondracek, T. Holz, E. Kirda, C. Kruegel, Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (IEEE, 2010), p. 223Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. van den Hoven
    • 1
  • D. Helbing
    • 2
  • D. Pedreschi
    • 3
  • J. Domingo-Ferrer
    • 4
  • F. Gianotti
    • 3
  • M. Christen
    • 5
    • 6
  1. 1.Philosophy SectionDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Chair of Sociology, in particular of Modeling and SimulationETH ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  3. 3.Dipartimento di InformaticaUniversita di PisaPisaItalia
  4. 4.Department of Computer Engineering and MathsUniversitat Rovira i VirgiliTarragonaCatalonia
  5. 5.Institute of Biomedical EthicsUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  6. 6.Psychology DepartmentUniversity of Notre DameNotre DameUSA

Personalised recommendations