The MAMI C accelerator

The beauty of normal conducting multi-turn recirculators
  • M. Dehn
  • K. Aulenbacher
  • R. Heine
  • H. -J. Kreidel
  • U. Ludwig-Mertin
  • A. Jankowiak
Review

Abstract

The demand for CW electron beam energies of more than 1 GeV led to the decision of constructing a worldwide unique accelerator – the Harmonic Double-Sided Microtron (HDSM). This machine nearly doubles the beam energy of the Mainz Microtron cascade from up to 855 MeV to now 1.6 GeV to extend the experimental capabilities for nuclear and particle physics experiments to higher excitation energies. For the recent decade the construction and commissioning of the HDSM at the Institut für Kernphysik has been the major task of the accelerator department.

References

  1. 1.
    V.I. Veksler, J. Phys. USSR. 9, 153 (1945)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    V.I. Veksler, Dokl. Ak. Nauk. 43, 346 (1944) (in russian)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    W.J. Henderson, H. LeCaine, R. Montalbetti, Nature 162, 669 (1948)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    E.M. Moroz, Sov. Phys. Dokl. 1, 326 (1956)ADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Roberts, Ann. Phys. 4, 115 (1958)ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. Brannen, H.R. Froelich, J. Appl. Phys. 32, 1179 (1961)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A.H. Babic, M. Sedlacek, Nucl. Instr. Meth. 56, 170 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. Axel, A.O. Hanson, J.R. Harlan, R.A. Hoffswell, D. Jamnik, D.C. Sutton, L.M. Young, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS-22, 1176 (1975)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. Axel, et al., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS-26, 3143 (1979)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. Ehrenberg, H. Averdung, B. Dreher, G. Fricke, H. Herminghaus, R. Herr, H. Hultzsch, G. Lührs, K. Merle, R. Neuhausen, G. Nöldeke, H.M. Stolz, V. Walter, H.D. Wohlfahrt, Nucl. Instr. Meth. 105, 53 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    H. Herminghaus, K.H. Kaiser, Nucl. Instr. Meth. 113, 123 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. Glückert, R. Neuhausen, Nucl. Instr. Meth., 151, 509 (1978)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Livingstone Report (1978) and Barnes Report (1980) in the USA, Lindenberger und Pinkau-Ausschuß (1980) in GermanyGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    H. Herminghaus, A. Feder, K.H. Kaiser, W. Manz, H.v.d. Schmitt, Nucl. Instr. Meth. 138, 1 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    H. Herminghaus, B. Dreher, H. Euteneuer, K.H. Kaiser, M. Kelliher, R. Klein, H.J. Kreidel, M. Loch, U. Ludwig-Mertin, H. Schöler, R. Schulze, P. Semmel, G. Stephan, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS-30, 3274 (1983)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Th. Walcher, Progr. Part. Nucl. Phys. 189, 24 (1990)ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    CRC201 Finanzierungsantrag, 3.7.1980Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    K. Aulenbacher, H.G. Andresen, J. Bermuth, T. Dombo, P. Drescher, H. Euteneuer, H. Fischer, D.v. Harrach, P. Hartmann, J. Hoffmann, P. Jennewein, K.H. Kaiser, S. Köbis, H.J. Kreidel, J. Langbein, C. Nachtigall, M. Petri, S. Plützer, E. Reichert, M. Schemies, H.J. Schöpe, K.H. Steffens, H. Trautner, T. Weis, Nucl. Instr. Meth. A391, 498 (1997)ADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. Steigerwald, K. Aulenbacher, H. Euteneuer, D.v. Harrach, P. Hartmann, J. Hoffmann, P. Jennewein, K.H. Kaiser, H.J. Kreidel, M. Leberig, C. Nachtigall, E. Reichert, M. Schemies, J. Schuler, C. Zalto, Proc. of EPAC98 (Stockholm, Sweden, 1998), p. 1430Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    H. Herminghaus, Proc. of LINAC90, Albuquerque, N.M. LA-12004-C 362 (1990)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Th. Doerk, H. Euteneuer, K.H. Kaiser, Proc. of EPAC96, Barcelona, Spain 1405 (1996)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. Jankowiak, et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 28, s01149 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    R. Heine, K. Aulenbacher, O. Chubarov, M. Dehn, H. Euteneuer, A. Jankowiak, P. Jennewein, H.J. Kreidel, U. Ludwig-Mertin, P. Ott, G. Stephan, V. Tioukine, Proc. of IPAC10 (Kyoto, Japan, 2010), p. 4328Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    S. Penner, P.H. Debenham, D.C. Green, R. Lindstrom. M.A.D. Wilson, L.M. Young, T.J. Boyd, E.A. Knapp, J.M. Potter, D.D. Swenson, P.J. Tallerico, Geneva, Switzerland (1980)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    P.H. Debenham, S. Penner. R.L. Ayres, R.I. Cutler, E.R. Lindstrom, D.L. Mohr, J.E. Rose, M.A.D. Wilson, N.R. Yoder, L.M. Young, R.E. Martin, A. Mitra, J.M. Potter, R.H. Stokes, P.J. Tallerico, L. Wilkerson, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS-30 (1983)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    V.I. Shvedunov, A.S. Alimov, A.S. Chepurnov, O.V. Chubarov, I.V. Gribov, B.S. Ishkhanov, I.-V. Surma, A.V. Tiunov, Proc. of PAC93, Washington, USA 2059 (1993)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    J. Takahashi, Y. Miyao, M.N. Martins, J.M. Machado, A.A. Malafronte, J.C.A. Alcon, J.M. Junior, A. Bonini, Proc. of EPAC92 (Berlin, Germany, 1992), p. 429Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    M. Erikson, Nucl. Instr. Meth. 196, 331 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    M. Erikson, Nucl. Instr. Meth. 261, 39 (1987)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    P. Lidbjörk, J. Aström, Proc. of PAC93 (Washington, USA, 1993), p. 2068Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    H. Herminghaus, Nucl. Instr. Meth. A 305, 1 (1991)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    T.K. Khoe, Conf. New Horizons in Electromagnetic Physics, Charlottesville, VA (1982)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    E.P. Colten, E.A. Crosbie, M. Foss, H.E. Jackson, K.W. Johnson, T.K. Khoe, M.J. Knott, R.L. Kustom, R.J. Lari, G.S. Mavrogenes, D.G. McGhee, J.H. Norem, J. Moenich, W.F. Praeg, H. Takeda, K.M. Thompson, R.B. Wehrle, Particle Accelerators 16, 81 (1984)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    K.H. Kaiser, Proc. of Conf. on Future Possibilities for Electron Acc., Charlottesville, VA, V-1 (1979)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    K.H. Kaiser, Proc. PAC99, New York, 4, 2915 (1999)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    S. Ratschow, Ph.D. thesis KPH 02/2002Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    K.H. Kaiser, K. Aulenbacher, O. Chubarov, M. Dehn, H. Euteneuer, F. Hagenbuck, R. Herr, A. Jankowiak, P. Jennewein, H.J. Kreidel, U. Ludwig-Mertin, M. Negrazus, S. Ratschow, St. Schumann, M. Seidl, G. Stephan, A. Thomas, Nucl. Instr. Meth. A 593, 159 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    R.E. Rand (Harwood Academic Publishers, 1984)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    K.H. Kaiser, PTRACE, written on the base of RAYTRACE from S.A. Enge and S. Kowalski (private communication)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    U. Ludwig-Mertin, K.H. Kaiser, P. Jennewein, Proc. of EPAC02 (Paris, France, 2002), p. 2361Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    H. Euteneuer, H. Schöler, Proc. of PAC86, Stanford, SLAC Report 303, 508 (1986)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    H. Euteneuer, O. Chubarov, A. Jankowiak, K. Dunkel, C. Piel, P. vom Stein, H. Vogel, Proc. of EPAC06 (Edinburgh, Scotland, 2006), p. 1292Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    TOSCA: Vector Fields, Software for Electromagnetic Design, Oxford, GBGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    F. Hagenbuck, P. Jennewein, K.H. Kaiser, Proc. of EPAC04 (Lucerne, Switzerland, 2004), p.1669Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    A. Thomas, P. Jennewein, K.-H. Kaiser, H.-J. Kreidel, U. Ludwig-Mertin, M. Seidl, Proc. of EPAC02 (Paris, France, 2002), p. 2379Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    H. Euteneuer, H. Herminghaus, P. Jennewein, K.-H. Kaiser, H.-J. Kreidel, D. Mittwich, G. Stephan, Th. Weis, P. Zinnecker, Proc. of LINAC92, Vol. 1 (Ottawa, Canada, AECL-10728, 1992), p. 356Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    P. Ott, Diploma Thesis KPH (2009)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    M. Dehn, H. Euteneuer, F. Fichtner, A. Jankowiak, K.H. Kaiser, W. Klag, H.J. Kreidel, S. Schumann, G. Stephan, Proc. of EPAC06 (Edinburgh, Scotland, 2006), p. 1076Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    H.J. Kreidel, K. Merle, Proc. of LINAC81 (Santa Fe, N.M., LA-9234-c, 1981), p. 245Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    M. Dehn, H. Euteneuer, A. Jankowiak, Proc. of PAC09 (Vancouver, Canada, 2009), p.3594Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    A. Jankowiak, K. Aulenbacher, D. Bender, O. Chubarov, M. Dehn, H. Euteneuer, F. Fichtner, B. Gutheil, F. Hagenbuck, R. Herr, P. Jennewein, K.H. Kaiser, W. Klag, H.J. Kreidel, U. Ludwig-Mertin, A. Nuck, J. Röthgen, B. Seckler, G. Stephan, V. Tioukine, G. Wöll, Th. Zschocke, Proc. of EPAC08 (Genova, Italy, 2008), p. 51Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    A. Jankowiak, K. Aulenacher, O. Chubarov, M. Dehn, H. Euteneuer, R. Heine, P. Jennewein, H.J. Kreidel, U. Ludwig-Mertin, P. Ott, G. Stephan, V. Tioukine, Proc. of PAC09 (Vancouver, Canada. 2009), p. 2772Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    H. Herminghaus, et al., Institut für Kernphysik, Universität Mainz, 1988–1989Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    M. Seidl, H. Euteneuer, K.H. Kaiser, W. Klag, H.J. Kreidel, F. Maas, J. Röthgen, G. Stephan, Proc. of EPAC00 (Wien, Austria, 2000), p. 1930Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    H.J. Kreidel, A. Gauch, G. Patzner, Nucl. Instr. Meth. A 293, 74 (1990)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    H.J. Kreidel, Proc. of EPAC88, Rome 2, 1205 (1988)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    H.J. Kreidel, M. Dehn, Proc. of ICALEPS 2009 Japan (2009), p. 768Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    M.I.A. Lourakis, A.A. Argyros, ACM Trans. Math. Software 36, (2009)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    M.I.A. Lourakis, A.A. Argyros, New York, NY, 21 (2009)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    J. Kennedy, R. Eberhart, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Neural Networks IV, 1942 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© EDP Sciences and Springer 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Dehn
    • 1
  • K. Aulenbacher
    • 1
  • R. Heine
    • 1
  • H. -J. Kreidel
    • 1
  • U. Ludwig-Mertin
    • 1
  • A. Jankowiak
    • 2
  1. 1.Institut für KernphysikJohannes Gutenberg-UniversitätMainzGermany
  2. 2.Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie GmbHElektronenspeicherring BESSY IIBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations