The European Physical Journal Special Topics

, Volume 192, Issue 1, pp 185–194 | Cite as

Terrestrial simulation of drop saturation by a surfactant under microgravity conditions

  • M. Kim
  • K. Kostarev
  • N. Pisarevskaya
  • A. Viviani
Regular Article


The paper presents the results of experimental study of mass transfer in a drop of weakly soluble fluid during its saturation with a surfactant from its water solution forming a thin (∼ 1 mm) horizontal layer. The use of the interferometer allowed us to visualize the concentration fields and to define the structure of flows under the conditions of maximum suppression of the buoyancy convection. It has been found that despite the small layer thickness, in the case of initially homogeneous solution penetration of the surfactant into the drop leads to the formation of the local density inhomogeneities at both sides of the interface and to the development of a slow gravitational flow. An increase in the initial concentration of the surfactant in the solution causes a small-scale non-stationary solutocapillary motion at the drop surface. On the other hand, solubility of the drop in water also increases which leads to the formation of a counter-diffusion flux and eventually to the disappearance of the interface. In the case of initially inhomogeneous distribution of the surfactant, a competition between the gravitational and capillary mechanisms of convection gives rise to a large-scale oscillatory flow around the drop.


Surfactant Surfactant Concentration European Physical Journal Special Topic Chlorobenzene Horizontal Layer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    J.C. Berg, C.R. Morig, Chem. Eng. Sci. 24, 937 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    N.M. Kovalchuk, D. Vollhardt, Phys. Chem. B 104, 7987 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. Agble, M.A. Mendes-Tatsis, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 43, 1025 (2000)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A.D. Myshkis, V.G. Babskii, N.D. Kopachevskii, L.A. Slobozhanin, A.D. Tyuptsov, Low-Gravity Fluid Mechanics (Springer, 1987), p. 583Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    K.G. Kostarev, V.L. Levtov, V.V. Romanov, A.V. Shmyrov, A. Viviani, Acta Astronautica 66, 427 (2010)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Mizev, Phys. Fluids 17, 122107 (2005)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. Nagy, P. Neitzel, Phys. Fluids 21, 112106 (2009)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Reichenbach, H. Linde, J. Coll. Interf. Sci. 84, 433 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    K.G. Kostarev, A.L. Zuev, N.N. Pisarevskaya, A. Viviani, Int. J. Microgr. Sci. Technol. 19, 26 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. Jehring, N.V. Huyen, E. Horn, Electroanal. Chem. 88, 265 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© EDP Sciences and Springer 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Continuous Media Mechanics UB RAS, Lab Hydrodynamic Stability Str.PermRussia
  2. 2.Seconda Universita di NapoliAversaItaly

Personalised recommendations