The European Physical Journal Special Topics

, Volume 192, Issue 1, pp 13–27 | Cite as

Particles of different density in thermocapillary liquid bridges under the action of travelling and standing hydrothermal waves

  • D. Schwabe
  • A.I. Mizev
Regular Article


We observed particles of different density ratio α = ρ p f in thermocapillary liquid bridges with steady and with time-dependent flow under normal- and under microgravity. Particle accumulation structures (PAS) visualize some features of the hydrothermal wave in the liquid bridge. Relatively fast formation of PAS from particles which are considerably less dense than the fluid (α = 0.42) in oscillatory thermocapillary flow of top-heated liquid bridges was observed and explained by an additional buoyancy-assisted mechanism which brings the particles into the surface flow. This PAS from particles with α = 0.42 will persist under normal gravity for infinite time. In contrast to these less dense particles the heavier particles with α > 1 settle down under normal gravity on the lower end face of the liquid bridge after some time and are no longer in suspension and PAS will fade out. On the other hand, particles with α = 0.42 will be less suited for experiments under microgravity than particles with α > 1 because most of them will be trapped in the vortex centre of the thermocapillary flow. The sedimented particles with α > 1 are a means to visualize some features of standing hydrothermal waves which are visualzed and discussed for the first time.


Standing Wave European Physical Journal Special Topic Liquid Bridge Normal Gravity Temperature Oscillation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    D. Schwabe, P. Hintz, S. Frank, Microgravity Sci. Technol. 9, 163 (1996)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Tanaka, H. Kawamura, I. Ueno, D. Schwabe, Phys. Fluids 18, 067103 (2006)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. Schwabe, S. Tanaka, A. Mizev, H. Kawamura, Microgravity Sci. Technol. 18, 117 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. Schwabe, A. Mizev, M. Udhayasankar, S. Tanaka, Phys. Fluids 19, 072101 (2007)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M.K. Smith, S.H. Davis, J. Fluid Mech. 132, 119 (1983)CrossRefzbMATHADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Domesi, Numerical Analysis of Particle Dynamics in the Thermocapillary Flow of Liquid Bridges, Ph. D. thesis, University Bremen, 2008Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    B.P. Ho, L.G. Leal, J. Fluid Mech. 65, 365 (1974)CrossRefzbMATHADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. Vasseur, R.G. Cox, J. Fluid Mech. 78, 385 (1976)CrossRefzbMATHADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. Schwabe, S. Frank, Adv. Space Res. 24, 1391 (1999)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Mizev, Phys. Fluids 17, 122107 (2005)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    P. Nagy, P.G. Neitzel, Phys. Fluids 21, 112106 (2009)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Leypholdt, H. Kuhlmann,H. J. Rath, J. Fluid Mech. 414, 286 (2000)ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© EDP Sciences and Springer 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Physikalisches Institut der Justus-Liebig-UniversitaetGiessenGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Continuous Media Mechanics, Acad. Koroleva 1PermRussia

Personalised recommendations