The European Physical Journal Special Topics

, Volume 185, Issue 1, pp 135–144 | Cite as

On the statistical interpretation of optical rogue waves

Article

Abstract.

Numerical simulations are used to discuss various aspects of “optical rogue wave” statistics observed in noise-driven fiber supercontinuum generation associated with highly incoherent spectra. In particular, we consider how long wavelength spectral filtering influences the characteristics of the statistical distribution of peak power, and we contrast the statistics of the spectrally filtered SC with the statistics of both the peak power of the most red-shifted soliton in the SC and the maximum peak power across the full temporal field with no spectral selection. For the latter case, we show that the unfiltered statistical distribution can still exhibit a long-tail, but the extreme-events in this case correspond to collisions between solitons of different frequencies. These results confirm the importance of collision dynamics in supercontinuum generation. We also show that the collision-induced events satisfy an extended hydrodynamic definition of “rogue wave” characteristics.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A.W. Scott, The Nonlinear Universe (Springer, Berlin, 2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J.M. Dudley, G. Genty, S. Coen, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78Discussion & Debate : Rogue Waves - Towards a Unifying Concept?, 1135 (2006)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M.N. Islam, G. Sucha, I. Bar-Joseph, M. Wegener, J.P. Gordon, D.S. Chemla, Opt. Lett. 14Discussion & Debate : Rogue Waves - Towards a Unifying Concept?, 370 (1989)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M.N. Islam, G. Sucha, I. Bar-Joseph, M. Wegener, J.P. Gordon, D.S. Chemla, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 6Discussion & Debate : Rogue Waves - Towards a Unifying Concept?, 1149 (1989)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Nakazawa, K.R. Tamura, H. Kubota, E. Yoshida, Opt. Fib. Tech. 4Discussion & Debate : Rogue Waves - Towards a Unifying Concept?, 215 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Nakazawa, H. Kubota, K.R. Tamura, Opt. Lett. 24Discussion & Debate : Rogue Waves - Towards a Unifying Concept?, 318 (1999)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    K.L. Corwin, N.R. Newbury, J.M. Dudley, S. Coen, S.A. Diddams, K. Weber, R.S. Windeler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90Discussion & Debate : Rogue Waves - Towards a Unifying Concept?, 113904 (2003)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    D.R. Solli, C. Ropers, P. Koonath, B. Jalali, Nature 450Discussion & Debate : Rogue Waves - Towards a Unifying Concept?, 1054 (2007)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J.M. Dudley, G. Genty, B.J. Eggleton, Opt. Express 16Discussion & Debate : Rogue Waves - Towards a Unifying Concept?, 3644 (2008)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. Genty, J.M. Dudley, B.J. Eggleton, Appl. Phys. B 94Discussion & Debate : Rogue Waves - Towards a Unifying Concept?, 187 (2009) [arXiv:0809.2388v1]CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Erkintalo, G. Genty, J.M. Dudley, Opt. Lett. 34Discussion & Debate : Rogue Waves - Towards a Unifying Concept?, 2468 (2009), ISSN 0146-9592CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Mussot, A. Kudlinski, M. Kolobov, E. Louvergneaux, M. Douay, M. Taki, Opt. Express 17Discussion & Debate : Rogue Waves - Towards a Unifying Concept?, 17010 (2009)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    B. Barviau, B. Kibler, S. Coen, A. Picozzi, Opt. Lett. 33Discussion & Debate : Rogue Waves - Towards a Unifying Concept?, 2833 (2008)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Taki, A. Mussot, A. Kudlinski, E. Louvergneaux, M. Kolobov, M. Douay, Phys. Lett. A 374Discussion & Debate : Rogue Waves - Towards a Unifying Concept?, 691 (2010)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. Genty, C. de Sterke, O. Bang, F. Dias, N. Akhmediev, J.M. Dudley, Phys. Lett. A 374Discussion & Debate : Rogue Waves - Towards a Unifying Concept?, 989 (2010)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    N. Akhmediev, V.I. Korneev, Theor. Math. Phys. 69Discussion & Debate : Rogue Waves - Towards a Unifying Concept?, 1089 (1986)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J.M. Dudley, G. Genty, F. Dias, B. Kibler, N. Akhmediev, Opt. Express 17Discussion & Debate : Rogue Waves - Towards a Unifying Concept?, 21497 (2009)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    N. Akhmediev, A. Ankiewicz, M. Taki, Phys. Lett. A 373Discussion & Debate : Rogue Waves - Towards a Unifying Concept?, 675 (2009)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    N. Akhmediev, J.M. Soto-Crespo, A. Ankiewicz, Phys. Lett. A 373Discussion & Debate : Rogue Waves - Towards a Unifying Concept?, 2137 (2009)CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. Onorato, A.R. Osborne, M. Serio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96Discussion & Debate : Rogue Waves - Towards a Unifying Concept?, 014503 (2006)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    P.K. Shukla, I. Kourakis, B. Eliasson, M. Marklund, L. Stenflo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97Discussion & Debate : Rogue Waves - Towards a Unifying Concept?094501 (2006)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    M.H. Frosz, O. Bang, A. Bjarklev, Opt. Express 14Discussion & Debate : Rogue Waves - Towards a Unifying Concept?, 9391 (2006)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    F. Luan, D.V. Skryabin, A.V. Yulin, J.C. Knight, Opt. Express 14Discussion & Debate : Rogue Waves - Towards a Unifying Concept?, 9844 (2006)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    M. Erkintalo, G. Genty, J.M. Dudley, Opt. Lett. 35Discussion & Debate : Rogue Waves - Towards a Unifying Concept?, 658 (2010)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    C. Lafargue, J. Bolger, G. Genty, F. Dias, J.M. Dudley, B.J. Eggleton, Electron. Lett. 45Discussion & Debate : Rogue Waves - Towards a Unifying Concept?, 217 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    E. Pelinovsky, C. Kharif (eds.), Extreme Ocean Waves (Springer, Berlin, 2008)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    S. Kumar, A. Selvarajan, G.V. Anand, Opt. Commun. 102Discussion & Debate : Rogue Waves - Towards a Unifying Concept?, 329 (1993)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    G.P. Agrawal, Nonlinear Fiber Optics, 4th edn. (Academic Press, San Diego, 2006)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    B.A. Malomed, Phys. Rev. A 44Discussion & Debate : Rogue Waves - Towards a Unifying Concept?, 1412 (1991)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    T.I. Lakoba, D.J. Kaup, Opt. Lett. 24Discussion & Debate : Rogue Waves - Towards a Unifying Concept?, 808 (1999)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© EDP Sciences and Springer 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tampere University of Technology, Institute of Physics, Optics LaboratoryTampereFinland
  2. 2.Département d’Optique P.M. Duffieux, Institut FEMTO-ST, UMR 6174, CNRS-Université de Franche-ComtéBesançonFrance

Personalised recommendations