The European Physical Journal Special Topics

, Volume 176, Issue 1, pp 81–92 | Cite as

Climate engineering: A critical review of approaches to modify the global energy balance

  • J. Feichter
  • T. Leisner
Open Access
Article

Abstract

Besides mitigation and adaptation, climate engineering, i.e. the large scale manipulation of the climate system has recently been promoted as a third strategy to combat the unwanted consequences of anthropogenic climate change. In this contribution, we address three climate engineering schemes that have been proposed. One scheme attempts to reduce the incoming solar radiation far outside the atmosphere, the other two increase the earth albedo either by introducing aerosols into the stratosphere or by modifying clouds in the lower marine atmosphere. While all three schemes face severe engineering challenges, they are in principle able to bring the global energy budget back toward the preindustrial value. However, this only holds for the global average, while unintentional regional climate response must be expected. The regional response is hardly predictable, and it is even rather difficult to detect in view of climatic variability. On the other hand, climate engineering would have severe ecological, societal, legal and political implications. We conclude that none of the schemes offers itself as remedy for climate change, but argue that dedicated research on their potential and consequences is advisable.

References

  1. H.H. Lamb, Climate engineering schemes to meet a climatic emergency, Earth Sci. Rev. 7, 87–95 (1971)Google Scholar
  2. P.M. Borisov, Can we Control the Arctic Climate?, Bull. Atomic Scient. 43–48 (1969)Google Scholar
  3. E. Teller, L. Wood, R. Hyde, Global Warming and Ice Ages: I. Prospects For Physics-Based Modulation of Global Change, 22nd International Seminar on Planetary Emergencies, Erice (Sicily), Italy, August 20-23, online available as reprint UCRL-JC-148012 by LLNL (1997)Google Scholar
  4. P.J. Crutzen, Geology of mankind, Nature 415, 23 (2002)Google Scholar
  5. P.J. Crutzen, Albedo Enhancements by Stratospheric Sulfur Injections: A Contribution to Resolve a Policy Dilemma?, Climatic Change 77, 211–219 (2006)Google Scholar
  6. R. Jaenicke, Aerosol Physics and Chemistry. In: Landolt-Börnstein Numerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology New Series Group V: Geophysics and Space Research Volume 4 Meteorology Subvolume b, edited by G. Fischer, Physical and Chemical Properties of the Air (2007), pp. 391–457Google Scholar
  7. A.R. Wallace, The Wonderful Century, Chapter IX: The Importance of Dust: A Source of Beauty and Essential to Life (Dodd, Mead And Company, 1899), p. 726 online available under: http://www.archive.org/details/wonderfulcentury028485mbpGoogle Scholar
  8. IPCC, 2007: Summary for Policymakers, in: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor and H.L. Miller (eds.) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 2007)Google Scholar
  9. R. Angel, Feasibility of cooling the Earth with a cloud of small spacecraft near the inner Lagrange point (L1), PNAS 103, 46 (2006)Google Scholar
  10. D.J. Lunt, A. Ridgwell, P.J. Valdes, A. Seale, Sunshade World: A fully coupled GCM evaluation of the climatic impacts of geoengineering, Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L12710 (2008)Google Scholar
  11. J.R. Pinto, R. Turco, O. Toon, Self-limiting Physical and Chemical Effects in Volcanic Eruption Clouds, J. Geophys. Res. 94(D8), 11165 (1989)Google Scholar
  12. J.H. Seinfeld, S.N. Pandis, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (John Wiley & Sons, 1998)Google Scholar
  13. P.J. Rasch, S. Tilmes, R.P. Turco, A. Robock, L. Oman, C.-C. Chen, G.L. Stenchikov, R.R. Garcia, An overview of geoengineering of climate using stratospheric sulphate aerosols, Philosoph. Transaction A 366, 1882 (2008)Google Scholar
  14. A. Robock, L. Oman, G.L. Stenchikov, Regional climate responses to geoengineering with tropical and Arctic SO2 injections, J. Geophys. Res. 113, D16101 (2008)Google Scholar
  15. P.J. Rasch, P.J. Crutzen, D.B. Coleman, Exploring the geoengineering of climate using stratospheric sulfate aerosols: The role of particle size, Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L02809 (2008)Google Scholar
  16. A.J. Krueger, L.S. Walter, P.K. Bhartia, C.C. Schnetzler, N.A. Krotkov, I. Sprod, G.J.S. Bluths, J. Volcanic sulfur-dioxide measurements from the total ozone mapping intruments, Geophys. Res. 100, 14057 (1995)Google Scholar
  17. M.J. Mills, O.B. Toon, R.P. Turco, D.E. Kinnison, R.R. Garcia, Massive global ozone loss predicted following regional nuclear conflict, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S. 105, 5307 (2008)Google Scholar
  18. J. Quaas, O. Boucher, N. Bellouin, S. Kinne, Satellite-based estimate of the direct and indirect aerosol climate forcing, J. Geophys. Res. 113, D05204 (2008)Google Scholar
  19. R. Bennartz, Harshvardhan, Global assessment of marine boundary layer cloud droplet number concentration from satellite, J. Geophys. Res. 112, D02201 (2007)Google Scholar
  20. J. Latham, P. Rasch, C.-C. Chen, L. Kettles, A. Gadian, A. Gettelman, H. Morrison, K. Bower, T. Choularton, Global temperature stabilization via controlled albedo enhancement of low-level maritime clouds, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 366, 3969 (2008)Google Scholar
  21. S. Salter, G. Sortino, J. Latham, Sea-going hardware for the cloud albedo method of reversing global warming, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 366, 3989 (2008)Google Scholar
  22. IPCC, 2001: Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by Houghton, J.T., Y. Ding, D.J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P.J. van der Linden, X. Dai, K. Maskell, C.A. Johnson (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 2001)Google Scholar
  23. B. Liepert, J. Feichter, U. Lohmann, E. Roeckner, Can aerosols spin down the water cycle in a warmer and moister world? Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L06207 (2004)Google Scholar
  24. B. Govindasamy, K. Caldeira, P.B. Duffy, Geoengineering Earth’s radiation balance to mitigate climate change from a quadrupling of CO2, Global Planet. Change 37, 157 (2003)Google Scholar
  25. K.E. Trenberth, A. Dai, Effects of Mount Pinatubo volcanic eruption on the hydrological cycle as an analog of geoengineering, Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L15702 (2007)Google Scholar
  26. S. Tilmes, R. Müller, R. Salawitch, The sensitivity of polar ozone depletion to proposed geoengineering schemes, Science 320, 1201 (2008)Google Scholar
  27. D.G.Victor, M.G. Morgan, F. Apt, J. Steinbruner, K. Ricke, The geoenigeering option. A last resort against global warming, Foreign Affairs 88, 2 (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© EDP Sciences and Springer 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Feichter
    • 1
  • T. Leisner
    • 2
  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institut für MeteorologieHamburgGermany
  2. 2.Institut für Meteorologie und KlimaforschungForschungszentrum KarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations