Advertisement

The European Physical Journal Special Topics

, Volume 171, Issue 1, pp 135–143 | Cite as

Transient heating effects in electromagnetic launchers with complex geometries: A 3D hybrid FE/BE analysis

  • Q. H. Lin
  • B. LiEmail author
  • D. Y. Kwok
Article

Abstract

A time-stepping finite-element (FE) and boundary-element (BE) coupling method was implemented to include 3D transient eddy current under electromagnetic heating effects in electromagnetic launchers. Lagrangian formulations were used to model electromagnetic and thermal diffusive processes with moving conductors. The finite-element formulation was employed for the general diffusion equation in a bounded conductor region including rail and armature; while, in the exterior region, the boundary element method was developed for Laplace's equation. The coupled boundary was employed directly on the surface of conductors and no special treatment on boundary was required. The electromagnetic and temperature fields were coupled through iterative calculations. This method results in considerable time saving in modeling as it eliminates the surrounding air region.

Keywords

European Physical Journal Special Topic Ohmic Heating Temperature Contour Magnetic Vector Potential Discrete Simulation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S.C. Rashleigh, R.A. Marshall, J. Appl. Phys. 49, 2540 (1978)Google Scholar
  2. D. Rodger, P.J. Leonard, J.F. Eastham, IEEE Trans. Magn. 27, 314 (1991)Google Scholar
  3. A. Slama, V. Mazauric, Y. Maréchal, Gérard Meunier, P. Wendling, IEEE Trans. Magn. 37, 139 (2001)Google Scholar
  4. J.F. Newill, J.D. Powell, A.E. Zielinski, IEEE Trans. Magn. 39, 148 (2003)Google Scholar
  5. K.-T. Hsieh IEEE Trans. Magn. 31, 604 (1995)Google Scholar
  6. S.H. Le, G. Bisson, P.J. Leonard, D. Rodger, IEEE Trans. Magn. 29, 1102 (1993)Google Scholar
  7. T. Onuki, S. Wakao, T. Yoshizawa, IEEE Trans. Magn. 31, 1436 (1995)Google Scholar
  8. S. Kurz, O. Rain, B. Auchmann, V. Rischmüller, S. Rajsanow, IEEE Trans. Magn. 42, 679 (2006)Google Scholar
  9. T. Onuki, J.-W. Im, T. Kuwahara, J. Appl. Phys. 81, 4076 (1997)Google Scholar
  10. M. Zucca, G. Crotti, O. Bottauscio, X. Li, M.D. Pardo, M. Chiampi, J. Appl. Phys. 99, 08P503 (2006)Google Scholar
  11. Y. Takahashi, S. Wakao, M. Kondo, N. Terauchi, J. Appl. Phys. 103, 07F126 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. V. Thiagarajan, K.-T. Hsieh, IEEE Trans. Magn. 41, 398 (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© EDP Sciences and Springer 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Key Laboratory of Transient Physics, Nanjing University of Science and TechnologyNanjingChina
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of CalgaryNanoscale Technology and Engineering LaboratoryAlbertaCanada

Personalised recommendations