Constraint polynomial approach: an alternative to the functional Bethe Ansatz method?

  • 12 Accesses


Recently developed general constraint polynomial approach is shown to replace a set of algebraic equations of the functional Bethe Ansatz method by a single polynomial constraint. As the proof of principle, the usefulness of the method is demonstrated for a number of quasi-exactly solvable (QES) potentials of the Schrödinger equation, such as two different sets of modified Manning potentials with three parameters, an electron in Coulomb and magnetic fields and relative motion of two electrons in an external oscillator potential, the hyperbolic Razavy potential, and a (perturbed) double sinh-Gordon system. The approach enables one to straightforwardly determine eigenvalues and wave functions. Odd parity solutions for the modified Manning potentials are also determined. For the QES examples considered here, constraint polynomials terminate a finite chain of orthogonal polynomials in an independent variable that need not to be necessarily energy. In the majority of cases the finite chain of orthogonal polynomials is characterized by a positive-definite moment functional \({\mathcal {L}}\), implying that a corresponding constraint polynomial has only real and simple zeros. Constraint polynomials are shown to be different from the weak orthogonal Bender–Dunne polynomials. At the same time the QES examples considered elucidate essential difference with various generalizations of the Rabi model. Whereas in the former case there are \(n+1\) polynomial solutions at each point of a nth baseline, in the latter case there are at most \(n+1\) polynomial solutions on entire nth baseline.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 99

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18


  1. 1.

    N. Hatami, M.R. Setare, Exact solutions for a class of quasi-exactly solvable models: a unified treatment. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 132, 311 (2017)

  2. 2.

    H. Panahi, M. Baradaran, Unified treatment of a class of spherically symmetric potentials: quasi-exact solution. arXiv:1607.04505

  3. 3.

    M. Baradaran, H. Panahi, Exact solutions of a class of double-well potentials: algebraic Bethe ansatz. arXiv:1712.06439

  4. 4.

    M. Baradaran, H. Panahi, Lie symmetry and the Bethe Ansatz solution of a new quasi-exactly solvable double-well potential, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2181532 arXiv:1702.06181 [math-ph] (2017)

  5. 5.

    R. Koc, M. Koca, A unified treatment of quasi-exactly solvable potentials I. arXiv:math-ph/0505002

  6. 6.

    A. V. Turbiner, The Heun operator as Hamiltonian. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 49, 26LT01 (2016). arXiv:1603.02053

  7. 7.

    A.V. Turbiner, One-dimensional quasi-exactly solvable Schrödinger equations. Phys. Rep. 642, 1–71 (2016). arXiv:1603.02992

  8. 8.

    A.M. Ishkhanyan, Schrödinger potentials solvable in terms of the general Heun functions. Ann. Phys. 388, 456–471 (2018). arXiv:1601.03360 [quant-ph]

  9. 9.

    A.M. Ishkhanyan, Schrödinger potentials solvable in terms of the confluent Heun functions. Theor. Math. Phys. 188, 980–993 (2016)

  10. 10.

    T.A. Ishkhanyan, A.M. Ishkhanyan, Solutions of the bi-confluent Heun equation in terms of the Hermite functions. Ann. Phys. 383, 79–91 (2017). arXiv:1608.02245 [quant-ph]

  11. 11.

    A. Moroz, A unified treatment of polynomial solutions and constraint polynomials of the Rabi models. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 51, 295201 (2018). arXiv:1712.09371

  12. 12.

    Q.-T. Xie, New quasi-exactly solvable double-well potentials. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 45, 175302 (2012)

  13. 13.

    B. Chen, Y. Wu, Q. Xie, Heun functions and quasi-exactly solvable double-well potentials. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 46(3), 035301 (2013)

  14. 14.

    M.F. Manning, Energy levels of a symmetrical double minima problem with applications to the NH\({}_3\) and ND\({}_3\) molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 3, 136–138 (1935)

  15. 15.

    A. Turbiner, Two electrons in an external oscillator potential: the hidden algebraic structure. Phys. Rev. A 50, 5335–5337 (1994). arXiv:hep-th/9406018

  16. 16.

    C.-M. Chiang, C.-L. Ho, Charged particles in external fields as physical examples of quasi-exactly-solvable models: a unified treatment. Phys. Rev. A 63, 062105 (2001)

  17. 17.

    A. Khare, B.P. Mandal, New quasi-exactly solvable Hermitian as well as non-Hermitian PT-invariant potentials. Pramana J. Phys. 73, 387–395 (2009)

  18. 18.

    M. Razavy, An exactly soluble Schrödinger equation with a bistable potential. Am. J. Phys. 48, 285–288 (1980)

  19. 19.

    Y.-Z. Zhang, Exact polynomial solutions of second order differential equations and their applications. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 45, 065206 (2012). arXiv:1107.5090

  20. 20.

    Y.-Z. Zhang, Hidden \(sl(2)\)-algebraic structure in Rabi model and its 2-photon and two-mode generalizations. Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 375, 460–470 (2016). arXiv:1608.05484

  21. 21.

    B.R. Judd, Exact solutions to a class of Jahn–Teller systems. J. Phys. C Solid State Phys. 12, 1685–1692 (1979)

  22. 22.

    M. Kus, On the spectrum of a two-level system. J. Math. Phys. 26, 2792–2795 (1985)

  23. 23.

    R. Haydock, The recursive solution of the Schrödinger equation, in Solid State Physics, vol. 35, ed. by H. Ehrenreich, F. Seitz, D. Turnbull (Academic Press, New York, 1980), pp. 215–294

  24. 24.

    C. Lanczos, An iteration method for the solution of the eigenvalue problem of linear differential and integral operators. J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand. 45, 255–282 (1950)

  25. 25.

    C.M. Bender, G.V. Dunne, Quasi-exactly solvable systems and orthogonal polynomials. J. Math. Phys. 37, 6–11 (1996)

  26. 26.

    A. Moroz, Haydock’s recursive solution of self-adjoint problems. Discrete spectrum. Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 351, 960–974 (2014)

  27. 27.

    L.D. Landau, E.M. Lifschitz, Quantum Mechanics (Pergamon, London, 1960), ch. V, par. 35

  28. 28.

    M. Znojil, Comment on “Conditionally exactly soluble class of quantum potentials”. Phys. Rev. A 61, 066101 (2000). arXiv:quant-ph/9811088

  29. 29.

    A. Faribault, O. El Araby, C. Sträter, V. Gritsev, Gaudin models solver based on the correspondence between Bethe ansatz and ordinary differential equations. Phys. Rev. B 83, 235124 (2011). arXiv:1103.0472

  30. 30.

    T.S. Chihara, An Introduction to Orthogonal Polynomials (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1978)

  31. 31.

    W. Gautschi, Computational aspects of three-term recurrence relations. SIAM Rev. 9, 24–82 (1967)

  32. 32.

    A. Hautot, On the Hill-determinant method. Phys. Rev. D 33, 437–443 (1986)

  33. 33.

    A. Moroz, Quantum models with spectrum generated by the flows of polynomial zeros. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 47(49), 495204 (2014)

Download references


AM acknowledges discussions with A. M. Ishkhanyan, B. M. Rodríguez-Lara, and M. Znojil in different stages of this work. The work of AEM was supported by the Australian Research Council and UNSW Scientia Fellowship.

Author information

Correspondence to Alexander Moroz.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (pdf 1639 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moroz, A., Miroshnichenko, A.E. Constraint polynomial approach: an alternative to the functional Bethe Ansatz method?. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 135, 73 (2020) doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-019-00045-8

Download citation