Advertisement

Quantification of microfibres released during washing of synthetic clothes in real conditions and at lab scale

  • Francesca De Falco
  • Gennaro Gentile
  • Emilia Di Pace
  • Maurizio Avella
  • Mariacristina Cocca
Regular Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Focus Point on Microplastic Pollution: Assessment, Effects and Mitigation Strategies

Abstract.

In this work, a systematic study aimed at comparing the amount of microfibres released from synthetic fabrics during washing tests performed by using a household washing machine and a lab scale Gyrowash system, a laboratory simulator of a real washing machine, is reported. The obtained results allow to conclude that the washing tests performed at lab scale are an effective analytical procedure to perform a low-time/low-cost estimation of the microfibre release from synthetic fabrics.

References

  1. 1.
    K.A.V. Zubris, B.K. Richards, Environ. Pollut. 138, 201 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. Habib, D.C. Locke, L.J. Cannone, Water Air Soil Pollut. 103, 1 (1998)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R.C. Thompson, Y. Olsen, R.P. Mitchell, A. Davis, S.J. Rowland, A.W.G. John, D. McGonigle, A.E. Russell, Science 304, 838 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M.A. Browne, P. Crump, S.J. Niven, E. Teuten, A. Tonkin, T. Galloway, R. Thompson, Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 9175 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    K. De Wael, L. Lepot, K. Lunstroot, F. Gason, Sci. Justice 50, 192 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    F. De Falco, M.P. Gullo, G. Gentile, E. Di Pace, M. Cocca, L. Gelabert, M. Brouta-Agnésa, A. Rovira, R. Escudero, R. Villalba, R. Mossotti, A. Montarsolo, S. Gavignano, C. Tonin, M. Avella, Environ. Pollut. 236, 916 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    K. Magnusson, C. Wahlberg, Technical Report published for IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute Swedish Environmental Research Institute, Stockholm, Sweden (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Gallagher, A. Rees, R. Rowe, J. Stevens, P. Wright, Mar. Pollut. Bull. 102, 243 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. Dris, J. Gasperi, V. Rocher, M. Saad, N. Renault, B. Tassin, Environ. Chem. 12, 592 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    E.I. Napper, R.C. Thompson, Mar. Pollut. Bull. 112, 39 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    N.L. Hartline, N.J. Bruce, S.N. Karba, E.O. Ruff, S.U. Sonarand, P.A. Holden, Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 11532 (2016)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    U. Pirc, M. Vidmar, A. Mozer, A. Kržan, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 23, 22206 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    TE Preferred Fiber Market Report ( 2016) available on-line at the following link: textileexchange.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/TE-Preferred-Fiber-Market-Report-Oct2016-1.pdfGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    T. Hussain, S. Ahmed, A. Qayum, Color Technol. 124, 375 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    N. Haleem, X. Wang, Text. Res. J. 85, 211 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Società Italiana di Fisica and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francesca De Falco
    • 1
    • 2
  • Gennaro Gentile
    • 1
  • Emilia Di Pace
    • 1
  • Maurizio Avella
    • 1
  • Mariacristina Cocca
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Polymers, Composites and BiomaterialsNational Research Council of ItalyPozzuoliItaly
  2. 2.University of Naples Federico IIDepartment of Chemical, Materials and Production EngineeringNaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations