Two-point theory for the differential self-interrogation Feynman-alpha method
- 93 Downloads
A Feynman-alpha formula has been derived in a two region domain pertaining the stochastic differential self-interrogation (DDSI) method and the differential die-away method (DDAA). Monte Carlo simulations have been used to assess the applicability of the variance to mean through determination of the physical reaction intensities of the physical processes in the two domains. More specifically, the branching processes of the neutrons in the two regions are described by the Chapman-Kolmogorov equation, including all reaction intensities for the various processes, that is used to derive a variance to mean relation for the process. The applicability of the Feynman-alpha or variance to mean formulae are assessed in DDSI and DDAA of spent fuel configurations.
KeywordsFast Neutron Fuel Assembly Spend Fuel Energy Group Spend Fuel Assembly
- 1.W. Kunz, J.T. Caldwell, J.D. Atencuo, Apparatus and method for quantitative assay of generic transuranic wastes from nuclear reactors., US Patent 4,483,816, March (1982).Google Scholar
- 2.S. Croft, B. Mc Elroy, L. Bourva, M. Villani, Evaluation of the Minimum Detectable Quantities of Fissile Material in a Differential Die-Away Chamber, in Waste Management Conf. Proc. (Arizona, USA, 2003) paper 115.Google Scholar
- 3.K.A. Jordan, Detection of Special Nuclear Material in Hydrogenous Cargo Using Differential Die-Away Analysis, PhD Thesis, Dept. Nucl. Engineering, University of California, Berkeley (2006).Google Scholar
- 8.I. Pázsit, L. Pál, A stochastic model of the differential die-away analysis (DDAA) method, in Proceedings 51st INMM 11 - 15 July, Baltimore, USA (2010).Google Scholar
- 9.R. Soule, W. Assal, P. Chaussonnet, C. Destouches, C. Domergue, C. Jammes, J.-M. Laurens, J.-F. Lebrat, F. Mellier, G. Perret, G. Rimpault, H. Serviére, G. Imel, G.M. Thomas, D. Villamarín, E.M. González-Romero, M. Plaschy, R. Chawla, J.L. Kloosterman, Y. Rugama, A. Billebaud, R. Brissot, D. Heuer, M. Kerveno, C. Le Brun, E. Liatard, J.-M. Loiseaux, O. Méplan, E. Merle, F. Perdu, J. Vollaire, P. Baeten, Nucl. Sci. Engin. 148, 124 (2004).Google Scholar
- 14.R. Avery, Theory of Coupled Reactors, in Proc. 2nd Conf. Geneva P/1858, 181 (1958).Google Scholar
- 15.I. Pázsit, L. Pál, Neutron Fluctuations --- a Treatise on the Physics of Branching Processes (Elsevier Ltd, Oxford New York Tokyo, 2008).Google Scholar
- 17.T. Lundqvist Saleh, Tomographic techniques for safeguards measurements of nuclear fuel assemblies Uppsala University Neutron Physics Report, UU-NF 07#14 (2007) ISSN 1401-6269.Google Scholar
- 18.D.B. Pelowitz (Editor), MCNPX User’s Manual, Version 2.7.0, Los Alamos National Laboratory report LA-CP-11-00438, April 2011.Google Scholar
- 19.M.R. Williamson, Multivariate Optimization of Neutron Detectors Through Modeling, PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2010 (http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/924).
- 20.I. Broeders, C.H.M. Broeders, Neutron Physics Calculations for ADS Targets, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe Technik und Umwelt Wissenschaftliche Berichte, FZKA Report 6507, Karlsruhe, 2000.Google Scholar