# The physical basis of natural units and truly fundamental constants

Open Access

Regular ArticleFirst Online:

Received:

Accepted:

- 746 Downloads
- 3 Citations

## Abstract

The natural unit system, in which the value of fundamental constants such as *c* and ℏ are set equal to one and all quantities are expressed in terms of a single unit, is usually introduced as a calculational convenience. However, we demonstrate that this system of natural units has a physical justification as well. We discuss and review the natural units, including definitions for each of the seven base units in the International System of Units (SI) in terms of a single unit. We also review the fundamental constants, which can be classified as units-dependent or units-independent. Units-independent constants, whose values are not determined by human conventions of units, may be interpreted as inherent constants of nature.

## Keywords

Natural Unit Fundamental Constant Thermodynamic Temperature Luminous Intensity Planck Unit
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Download
to read the full article text

## References

- 1.J.D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd edition (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1999) pp. 775-776Google Scholar
- 2.B.N. Taylor (Editor), NIST Special Publication 330: The International System of Units (SI) (National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 2001). See also the SI Brochure, http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/pdf/si_brochure_8.pdf (in particular, 2.1.1)
- 3.A. Ernst, J.P. Hsu, Chin. J. Phys.
**39**, 211 (2001) It is interesting to note that Voigt proposed the idea of the universal speed of light in 1887 long before Poincaré and Einstein wrote their milestone papers in 1905Google Scholar - 4.L. Hsu, J.P. Hsu, D.A. Schneble, Nuovo Cimento B
**111**, 1229 (1996)Google Scholar - 5.J.P. Hsu, L. Hsu, Nuovo Cimento B
**112**, 575 (1997)Google Scholar - 6.J.P. Hsu, L. Hsu, Phys. Lett. A
**196**, 1 (1994)MathSciNetADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 7.I.M. Mills, P.J. Mohr, T.J. Quinn, B.N. Taylor, E.R. Williams, Metrologia
**43**, 227 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 8.J.P. Hsu, L. Hsu, Chin. J. Phys.
**35**, 407 (1977) and J.P. Hsu, Einstein’s Relativity and Beyond: New Symmetry ApproachesGoogle Scholar - 9.E.F. Taylor, J.A. Wheeler, Spacetime Physics, 2nd edition (W. H. Freeman, New York, 1992) pp. 1-4 and pp. 58-59Google Scholar
- 10.T.A. Moore, A Traveler’s Guide to Spacetime: An Introduction to the Special Theory of Relativity (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1995), T.A. Moore, Six Ideas That Shaped Physics Unit R: The Laws of Physics and Frame-Independent, 2nd edition (McGraw-Hill, Boston, 2003)Google Scholar
- 11.V.S. Tuninsky, Metrologia
**36**, 9 (1999)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 12.J. Fischer, B. Fellmuth, Rep. Prog. Phys.
**68**, 1043 (2005)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 13.R.L. Wadlinger, G. Hunter, Phys. Teach.
**26**, 528 (1988)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 14.A. Maksymowicz, Am. J. Phys.
**44**, 295 (1976)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 15.M.J.T. Milton, J.M. Williams, S.J. Bennett, Metrologia
**44**, 356 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 16.J.-M. Lévy-Leblond, Riv. Nuovo Cimento
**7**, 187 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 17.J.P. Hsu, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A
**21**, 5119 (2006) for a discussion of this gravitational constant in Yang-Mills gravity, see also 15b,15cADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 18.J.P. Hsu, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A
**24**, 5217 (2009)ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 19.J.P. Hsu, Eur. Phys. J. Plus
**126**, 24 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 20.In a recent column in Physics Today (F. Wilczek, Physics Today 56 No. 5, 10 (2003)), Wilczek states that parameters such as $e$, $\hbar$, and the mass of the electron $m_{e}$ can be eliminated by a suitable choice of a system of units for length $(\hbar^{2}/m_{e}e^{2})$, time $(\hbar^{3}/m_{e}e^{4})$, and mass $(m_{e})$. This is much the same as choosing a system of natural units, in which parameters such as $c$, $\hbar$ and $k_{B}$ are eliminated. As Wilczek mentions later in the article, for a more complete theory, additional parameters such as the fine structure constant $\alpha$ inevitably come inGoogle Scholar
- 21.Peter J. Mohr, Barry N. Taylor, Rev. Mod. Phys.
**72**, 351 (2000)ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 22.V. Kose, W. Wöger, Metrologia
**22**, 177 (1986)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 23.J.P. Hsu, Mod. Phys. Lett. A.
**26**, 1707 (2011) This paper discusses a unified model of gravitational and electroweak forces based on the gauge symmetry $T(4)\times SU(2)\times U(1)$. The unified model suggests that the coupling constants of all these forces are equally fundamentalADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 24.P.A.M. Dirac, Sci. Am.
**208**, 48 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 25.Another method of deciding a truly fundamental and inherent constant of nature is that it must have the same value in both inertial and non-inertial frames. The result of this method is consistent with our discussion in this paper. The reason for this method is that all physically realizable frames of reference are, strictly speaking, non-inertial because of the long-ranged gravitational force and the accelerated cosmic expansion. Inertial frames are idealized frames when the accelerations of non-inertial frames approach zero. For a discussion of accelerated frames and the Wu transformations of space-time, see the appendix of L. Hsu, J.P. Hsu, Nuovo Cimento B, 112, 1147 (1997), J.P. Hsu, D. Fine, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A. 20, 7485 (2005), J.P. Hsu, Chin. J. Phys. 40, 265 (2002)Google Scholar

## Copyright information

© Società Italiana di Fisica and Springer 2012