Advertisement

The European Physical Journal H

, Volume 44, Issue 4–5, pp 371–379 | Cite as

Einstein’s working sheets and his search for a unified field theory

  • Tilman SauerEmail author
Article
First Online:

Abstract

The Einstein Archives contain a considerable collection of calculations in the form of working sheets and scratch paper, documenting Einstein’s scientific preoccupations during the last three decades of his life until his death in 1955. This paper provides a brief description of these documents and some indications of what can be expected from a more thorough investigation of these notes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bergia, S. (1993). Attempts at Unified Field Theories (1919–1955). Alleged Failure and Intrinsic Validation/Refutation Criteria. In Earman, J., Janssen, M., and Norton, J. D., editors,The Attraction of Gravitation: New Studies in the History of General Relativity. Boston, Basel, Berlin: Birkhäuser, pp. 274–307. Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Calaprice, A., Kennefick, D., and Schulmann, R. (2015).An Einstein Encyclopedia. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Debever, R., editor (1979).Élie Cartan—Albert Einstein. Letters on Absolute Parallelism 1929–1932. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Original text, English translation by Jules Leroy and Jim Ritter. Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Earman, J. and Janssen, M. (1993). Einstein’s Explanation of the Motion of Mercury’s Perihelion. In Earman, J., Janssen, M., and Norton, J. D., editors,The Attraction of Gravitation: New Studies in the History of General Relativity. Boston, Basel, Berlin: Birkhäuser, pp. 129–172. Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Einstein, A. (1923). Zur allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie.Preuß ische Akademie der Wissenschaften (Berlin). Physikalisch-mathematische Klasse. Sitzungsberichte, pp. 32–38. Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., and Rosen, N. (1935). Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete?Phys. Rev., 47:777–780 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goenner, H.F.M. (2004). On the History of Unified Field Theories.Liv. Rev. Relat., 7:2. http://www.livingreviews.org/lrr-2004-2. MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goenner, H.F.M. (2014). On the History of Unified Field Theories. Part II. (ca. 1930–ca. 1965).Liv. Rev. Relat., 17:5. http://www.livingreviews.org/lrr-2014-5. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goldstein, C. and Ritter, J. (2003). The Varieties of Unity: Sounding Unified Theories 1920–1930. In Ashtekhar, A., Cohen, R.S., Howard, D., Renn, J., Sarkar, S., and Shimony, A., editors,Revisiting the Foundations of Relativistic Physics. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 93–149. Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gutfreund, H. and Renn, J. (2015).The Road to Relativity. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Klein, M.J., Kox, A.J., Renn, J., and Schulmann, R., editors (1993).The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein. Vol. 3. The Swiss Years: Writings, 1909–1911. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Klein, M.J., Kox, A.J., Renn, J., and Schulmann, R., editors (1995).The Collected Papers ofAlbert Einstein. Vol. 4. The Swiss Years, 1912–1914. Princeton, N.J.: PrincetonUniversity Press. Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kormos Buchwald D. (2005). The Einstein Papers Project 1955–2005. In Renn, J., editor,One Hundred Authors for Einstein. Weinheim: Wiley, pp. 448–452 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kormos Buchwald, D., Illy, J., Kox, A., Lehmkuhl, D., Rosenkranz, Z., and James, J.N., editors (2018).The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein. Vol. 15. The Berlin Years: Writings & Correspondence, June 1925–May 1925. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kormos Buchwald, D., Illy, J., Rosenkranz, Z., and Sauer, T., editors (2012).The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein. Vol. 13. The Berlin Years: Writings & Correspondence, January 1922–March 1923. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mendelsson, D., Falk, E., and Oliver, A.L. (2014). The Albert Einstein archives digitization project: opening hidden treasures.Library Hi Tech, 32:318–335. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Norton, J.D. (1984). How Einstein Found His Field Equations, 1912–1915.Hist. Stud. Phys. Sci., 14:253–316. Reprinted in Einstein and the History of General Relativity, eds. D. Howard, J. Stachel (Boston et al.: Birkhäuser, 1989), pp. 101–159. Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pais, A. (1982).‘Subtle is the Lord ...’ The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Renn, J., editor (2007).The Genesis of General Relativity (4 vols.). Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Renn, J. and Sauer, T. (1999). Heuristics and Mathematical Representation in Einstein’s Search for a Gravitational Field Equation. In Goenner, H., Renn, J., Ritter, J., and Sauer, T., editors,The Expanding Worlds of General Relativity. Boston et al.: Birkhäuser, pp. 87–125. Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Renn, J. and Sauer, T. (2003). Eclipses of the Stars. Mandl, Einstein, and the Early History of Gravitational Lensing. In Ashtekhar, A. e. a., editors,Revisiting the Foundations of Relativistic Physics. Festschrift in Honor of John Stachel. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 69–92. Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Renn, J., Sauer, T., and Stachel, J. (1997). The Origin of Gravitational Lensing: A Postscript to Einstein’s 1936 Science Paper.Science, 275:184–186. ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sauer, T. (2004). The Challenge of Editing Einstein’s Scientific Manuscripts.Document. Edit., 26:145–165. Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sauer, T. (2006). Field equations in teleparallel space-time: Einstein’s Fernparallelismus approach toward unified field theory.Hist. Math., 33:399–439. MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sauer, T. (2007). An Einstein manuscript on the EPR paradox for spin observables.Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys., 38:879–887. MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sauer, T. (2008). Nova Geminorum 1912 and the Origin of Gravitational Lensing.Arch. Hist. Exact Sci., 62:1–22. ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sauer, T. (2014). Einstein’s Unified Field Theory Program. In Janssen, M. and Lehner, C., editors,The Cambridge Companion to Einstein. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 281–305. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/3293/ (2007).
  28. 28.
    Sauer, T. and Schuetz, T. (2019). Exploring Gravitational Lensing.Eur. J. Phys., 40:035501. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stachel, J., editor (1987).The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein. Vol. 1. The early years, 1879–1902. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tonnelat, M.-A. (1966).Einstein’s Theory of Unified Fields. New York, London, Paris: Gordon and Breach. English translation by Richard Akerib of French edition “La Théorie du champ unifié d’Einstein et quelques-uns de ses développements” (1955). Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    van Dongen, J. (2010).Einstein’s Unification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vizgin, V.P. (1994).Unified Field Theories in the first third of the 20th century. Basel, Boston, Berlin: Birkhäuser. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© EDP Sciences, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Mathematics, Johannes Gutenberg University MainzMainzGermany

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options