The Joint European Torus (JET)

Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Plasma physics in the 20th century as told by players

Abstract

This paper addresses the history of JET, the Tokamak that reached the highest performances and the experiment that so far came closest to the eventual goal of a fusion reactor. The reader must be warned, however, that this document is not a comprehensive study of controlled thermonuclear fusion or even of JET. The next step on this road, the ITER project, is an experimental reactor. Actually, several prototypes will be required before a commercial reactor can be built. The fusion history is far from been finalised. JET is still in operation some 32 years after the first plasma and still has to provide answers to many questions before ITER takes the lead on research. Some physical interpretations of the observed phenomena, although coherent, are still under discussion. This paper also recalls some basic physics concepts necessary to the understanding of confinement: a knowledgeable reader can ignore these background sections. This fascinating story, comprising successes and failures, is imbedded in the complexities of twentieth and the early twenty-first centuries at a time when world globalization is evolving and the future seems loaded with questions. The views here expressed on plasma confinement are solely those of the author. This is especially the case for magnetic turbulence, for which other scientists may have different views.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    P.-H. Rebut, Instabilités non magnétohydrodynamiques dans les plasmas à densité de courant élevé. Plasma Physics 4, 159 (1962)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. Laval, R. Pellat, P.-H. Rebut, Les équilibres de bifurcation et la stabilité hydromagnétique, Euratom CEA Fontenay-aux-Roses. Fusion nucléaire 3, (1963)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. Furth, J. Killeen, M.N. Rosenbluth, Finite resistivity instability of a sheet pinch. Phys. Fluids 6, 459 (1963)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    JET Design Group, The JET Project – Preliminary Description. (EUR – JET - R1) Culham Laboratory, Abingdon, Berkshire, England (1973)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    The JET project, Design proposal (EUR - JET R5): Commission of the European Communities, Directorate General XII, Fusion Project 1975Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    P.-H. Rebut, B.J. Green, Effect of impurity radiation on Tokamak equilibrium. Plasma Physics and controlled nuclear fusion researches; Procs 6th Int. Conf. Berchstesgaden, 6-13 October 1976 Vienna; IAEA 1977 2, 3 (1976)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P.-H. Rebut, M. Hugon, JET Abingdon UK, Thermal instability and disruptions in a Tokamak: Plasma physics and controlled nuclear fusion research, 10th Int.Conf. London, UK, 12–19 September (1984)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P.-H. Rebut, Magnetic islands and chaos induced by heat flow and all. Plasma Physics and controlled nuclear fusion researches (1986)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P.-H. Rebut, M.L. Watkins, P.P. Lallia, Electron heat transport in Tokamaks. Controlled Fusion and Plasma Physics. 14th Euro. Conf. Madrid 1987, Geneva. European Physical Society 1, 172–172C (1987)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    P.-H. Rebut, JET Team, Recent JET results and future prospects. Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion research 13th Int. Conf., Washington, DC, 1–6 October 1990. Vienna, IAEA 1, 27–52 (1990)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    F. Romanelli, the JET team, Overview of the JET results. Nucl. Fusion 55, 104001 14 (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    T.F. Wagner et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1408 (1982)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    T.E. Evans et al., Nat. Phys. 2, 419 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© EDP Sciences and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.10 place des VosgesParisFrance

Personalised recommendations