Advertisement

The European Physical Journal H

, Volume 38, Issue 5, pp 573–594 | Cite as

Millikan’s measurement of Planck’s constant

  • Allan Franklin
Article

Abstract

Robert Millikan is famous for measuring the charge of the electron. His result was better than any previous measurement and his method established that there was a fundamental unit of charge, or charge quantization. He is less well-known for his measurement of Planck’s constant, although, as discussed below, he is often mistakenly given credit for providing significant evidence in support of Einstein’s photon theory of light.1 His Nobel Prize citation was “for his work on the elementary electric charge of electricity and the photoelectric effect,” an indication of the significance of his work on the photoelectric effect.

Keywords

Physical Review Wavelength Limit Philosophical Magazine Contact Voltage Elementary Electric Charge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bohr, N., H.A. Kramers et al. 1924. The Quantum Theory of Radiation. Philosophical Magazine 47: 785–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Compton, A.H. and A.W. Simon. 1925. Directed Quanta of Scattered X-rays. Physical Review 26: 289–299ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Compton, K.T. 1913. Note on the Velocity of Electrons Liberated by Photoelectric Action. Physical Review 1: 382–392ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cornelius, D.W. 1913. The Velocity of Electrons in the Photo-Electric Effect, as a Function of the Wave Lenghts of Light. Physical Review 1: 16–34ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Einstein, A. 1931. Professor Einstein at the California Institute of Technology. Science 73: 375–379ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Giancoli, D.C. 2005. Physics. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  7. Holton, G. and S.G. Brush. 2001. Physics, the Human Adventure. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJGoogle Scholar
  8. Hughes, A.L. 1912. On the Emission Velocities of Photo-Electrons. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (London) A 212: 205–226ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hughes, A.L. 1914. On the Long-Wave Limits of the Normal Photoelectric Effect. Philosophical Magazine 27: 473–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Joffe, A. 1907. Eine Bemerkung zu der Arbeit von E. Ladenburg: “Uber Anfangsgeschwindigkeit und Menge der photoelektrischer Elekronen usu”. Annalen der Physik 24: 939–940ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kadesch, W.H. 1914. The Energy of Photo-Electrons from Sodium and Potassium as a Function of the Frequency of the Inciedent Light. Physical Review 3: 367–374ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kunz, J. 1909. On the Photoelectric Effect of Sodium-potassium Alloy and its Bearing on the Structure of the Ether. Physical Review 29: 212–228ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. Kunz, J. 1911. On the Positive Potential of Metals in the Photoelectric Effect and the Determination of the Wave-length Equivalent of Roentgen Rays. Physical Review 33: 208–214ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. Ladenburg, E. 1907. Uber Anfangsgeschwindigkeit und Menge der photoelektrischer Elekronen in ihrem Zusammenhange mit der Wellenlange des auslosenden Lichtes. Physikalische Zeitschrift 8: 590–594Google Scholar
  15. Millikan, R.A. 1914. A Direct Determination of “h”. Physical Review 4: 73–75ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. Millikan, R.A. 1916a. A Direct Photoelectric Determination of Planck’s ‘h’. Physical Review 7: 355–388ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Millikan, R.A. 1916b. Einstein’s Photoelectric Equation and the Contact Electromotive Force. Physical Review 7: 18–32ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Millikan, R.A. 1917. The Electron. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  19. Millikan, R.A. 1924. The Electron, 2nd edn. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  20. Millikan, R.A. 1935. Electrons ( + and), Protons, Photons, Neutrons, and Cosmic Rays. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  21. Millikan, R.A. 1950. The Autobiography of Robert A. Millikan. Prentice-Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Pohl, R. and P. Pringsheim. 1913. On the Long-wave Limits of the Normal Photoelectric Effect. Philosophical Magazine 26: 1017–1024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Richardson, O.W. 1914. Note on the Direct Determination of h. Phyical Review 4: 522–523ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Richardson, O.W. and K.T. Compton. 1912a. The Photoelectric Effect. Philosophical Magazine 6: 575–594Google Scholar
  25. Richardson, O.W. and K.T. Compton. 1912b. The Photoelectric Effect. Physical Review 34: 393–396Google Scholar
  26. Ruark, A.E. and H.C. Urey. 1930. Atoms, Molecules, and Quanta. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Sears, F.W. and M.W. Zemansky. 1955. University Physics. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MAGoogle Scholar
  28. Stuewer, R.H. 1975. The Compton Effect: Turning Point in Physics. Science History Publications, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Thomson, J.J. 1914. Ionisation. Proceedings of the Physical Society of London 27: 94–117Google Scholar
  30. White, H.E. 1964. Introduction to Atomic and Nuclear Physics. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Wright, J. 1911. The Positive Potential of Aluminum as a Function of the Wave-Length of the Incident Light. Physical Review 33: 43–52ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© EDP Sciences and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysicsUniversity of ColoradoBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations