The European Physical Journal E

, Volume 12, Supplement 1, pp 93–96 | Cite as

First inelastic neutron scattering studies on thin free standing polymer films

  • B. Frick
  • K. Dalnoki-Veress
  • J.A. Forrest
  • J. Dutcher
  • C. Murray
  • A. Higgins
Article

Abstract.

Glass transition studies in free standing polymer films have revealed values of the transition temperature, Tg, which were substantially reduced below the bulk for sufficiently thin films. Here we report on the preparation of two stacks of free standing polystyrene films: 70 films with a thickness of h ∼ 107 nm and 140 films with h ∼ 55 nm with equivalent total sample thicknesses of approximately 7.5 μm. We have performed the first measurements on such samples using inelastic neutron scattering, and demonstrate that inelastic neutron scattering experiments, performed on the time-of-flight spectrometer IN6 and the backscattering spectrometer IN16 at the Institut Laue-Langevin, are feasible.

PACS codes.

82.35.Lr - Physical properties of polymers 64.70.Pf - Glass transitions 68.60.Bs - Mechanical and acoustical properties 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1. Dynamics in Confinement, Eds. B. Frick, R. Zorn, H. Buttner, J. Phys. IV France 10, Pr7 (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2. J.A. Forrest, R.A.L. Jones, in Polymer Surfaces, Interfaces and Thin Films, edited by A. Karim, S. Kumar (World Scientific, Singapore, 2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3. J.A. Forrest, K. Dalnoki-Veress, Adv. in Colloid and Interface Science 94, 167–195 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4. K. Dalnoki-Veress, J.A. Forrest, C. Murray, C. Gigault, J.R. Dutcher, Phys. Rev. E 63, 031801 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5. P.-G. de Gennes, Eur. Phys. J. E 2, 201 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6. J.A. Forrest, C. Svanberg, K. Révész, M. Rodahl, L.M. Torell, B. Kasemo, Phys. Rev. E 58, R1226 (1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7. B. Frick, U. Buchenau, D. Richter, Colloid Polym. Sci. 273, 413 (1995); T. Kawaguchi, T. Kanaya, K. Kaji, Physica B 213, 510 (1995)Google Scholar
  8. 8. Showing the data in as raw a form as possible avoids any bias which might be introduced by background subtractionsGoogle Scholar
  9. 9. K. Linder, Diploma thesis (1993), IFF, FZ-Jülich and T. AachenGoogle Scholar
  10. 10. R. Zorn, D. Richter, L. Hartmann, F. Kremer, B. Frick, J. Phys. IV France 10, Pr7–83 (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© EDP Sciences, Società Italiana di Fisica, Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Frick
    • 1
  • K. Dalnoki-Veress
    • 2
  • J.A. Forrest
    • 3
  • J. Dutcher
    • 4
  • C. Murray
    • 4
  • A. Higgins
    • 5
  1. 1.Institut Laue-Langevin, 6 rue Jules Horowitz, 38042 Grenoble, France
  2. 2.Department of Physics & Astronomy and the Brockhouse Institute for Materials Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada, L8S 4M1
  3. 3.Department of Physics and Guelph-Waterloo Physics Institute, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada, N2L 3G1
  4. 4.Department of Physics and Guelph-Waterloo Physics Institute, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada, N1G 2W1
  5. 5.Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, U.K, S3 7RH

Personalised recommendations