Dynamics of hydrodynamically coupled Brownian harmonic oscillators in a Maxwell fluid

  • Shuvojit PaulEmail author
Regular Article


It has been shown recently that the coupled dynamics of micro-particles in a viscous fluid has many interesting aspects including motional resonance which can be used to perform two-point micro-rheology. However, it is expected that this phenomenon in a viscoelastic fluid is much more interesting due to the presence of the additional frequency-dependent elasticity of the medium. Thus, a theory describing the equilibrium dynamics of two hydrodynamically coupled Brownian harmonic oscillators in a viscoelastic Maxwell fluid has been derived which appears with new and impressive characteristics. Initially, the response functions have been calculated and then the fluctuation-dissipation theorem has been used to calculate the correlation functions between the coloured noises present on the concerned particles placed in a Maxwell fluid due to the thermal motions of the fluid molecules. These correlation functions appear to be in a linear relationship with the delta-correlated noises in a viscous fluid. Consequently, this reduces the statistical description of a simple viscoelastic fluid to the statistical representation for an extended dynamical system subjected to delta-correlated random forces. Thereupon, the auto and cross-correlation functions in the time domain and frequency domain and the mean-square displacement functions of the particles have been calculated which are perfectly consistent with their corresponding established forms in a viscous fluid and emerge with exceptional features.

Graphical abstract


Flowing Matter: Liquids and Complex Fluids 



  1. 1.
    A. Einstein, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 17, 549 (1905)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Von Smoluchowski, Ann. Phys. 326, 756 (1906)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    V. Volkov, A.I. Leonov, J. Chem. Phys. 104, 5922 (1996)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Grimm, S. Jeney, T. Franosch, Soft Matter 7, 2076 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Tassieri, G.M. Gibson, R. Evans, A.M. Yao, R. Warren, M.J. Padgett, J.M. Cooper, Phys. Rev. E 81, 026308 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    T.G. Mason, D. Weitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1250 (1995)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J.C. Meiners, S.R. Quake, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2211 (1999)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Martin, M. Reichert, H. Stark, T. Gisler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 248301 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Paul, A. Laskar, R. Singh, B. Roy, R. Adhikari, A. Banerjee, Phys. Rev. E 96, 050102 (2017)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. Paul, R. Kumar, A. Banerjee, Phys. Rev. E 97, 042606 (2018)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Brust, C. Schaefer, R. Doerr, L. Pan, M. Garcia, P. Arratia, C. Wagner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 078305 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Y.A. Ayala, B. Pontes, D.S. Ether, L.B. Pires, G.R. Araujo, S. Frases, L.F. Romão, M. Farina, V. Moura-Neto, N.B. Viana et al., BMC Biophys. 9, 5 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Doi, S.F. Edwards, The Theory of Polymer Dynamics, Vol. 73 (Oxford University Press, 1988)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J.C. Crocker, M.T. Valentine, E.R. Weeks, T. Gisler, P.D. Kaplan, A.G. Yodh, D.A. Weitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 888 (2000)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J.C. Crocker, B.D. Hoffman, Methods Cell Biol. 83, 141 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    C.W. Gardiner, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B: Opt. Phys. 1, 409 (1984)ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    R. Kubo, Rep. Prog. Phys. 29, 255 (1966)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© EDP Sciences / Società Italiana di Fisica / Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Institute of Science Education and Research KolkataMohanpurIndia

Personalised recommendations