Spheroidal approximation for finite-amplitude highly viscous axisymmetric drop/bubble free shape relaxation

  • A. Y. RednikovEmail author
  • S. S. Sadhal
Regular Article


A common simplification used in different physical contexts by both experimentalists and theoreticians when dealing with essentially non-spherical drops is treating them as ellipsoids or, in the axisymmetric case, spheroids. In the present theoretical study, we are concerned with such a spheroidal approximation for free viscous shape relaxation of strongly deformed axisymmetric drops towards a sphere. A general case of a drop in an immiscible fluid medium is considered, which includes the particular cases of high and low inside-to-outside viscosity ratios (e.g., liquid drops in air and bubbles in liquid, respectively). The analysis involves solving for the accompanying Stokes (creeping) flow inside and outside a spheroid of an evolving aspect ratio. Here this is accomplished by an analytical solution in the form of infinite series whose coefficients are evaluated numerically. The study aims at the aspect ratios up to about 3 at most in both the oblate and prolate domains. The inconsistency of the spheroidal approximation and the associated non-spheroidal tendencies are quantified from within the approach. The spheroidal approach turns out to work remarkably well for the relaxation of drops of relatively very low viscosity (e.g., bubbles). It is somewhat less accurate for drops in air. A semi-heuristic result encountered in the literature, according to which the difference of the squares of the two axes keeps following the near-spherical linear evolution law even for appreciable deformations, is put into context and verified against the present results.

Graphical abstract


Flowing Matter: Liquids and Complex Fluids 


  1. 1.
    S. Guido, M. Villone, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 209, 247 (1999)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Luciani, M.F. Champagne, L.A. Utracki, J. Polym. Sci. Part B: Polym. Phys. 35, 1393 (1997)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. Mo, C. Zhou, W. Yu, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech. 91, 221 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. Ohsaka, A. Rednikov, S.S. Sadhal, E.H. Trinh, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 73, 2091 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    C.P. Lee, A.V. Anilkumar, T.G. Wang, Phys. Fluids 6, 3554 (1994)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A.L. Yarin, M. Pfaffenlehner, C. Tropea, J. Fluid Mech. 356, 65 (1998)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    G.I. Taylor, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 280, 383 (1964)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    P.L. Maffettone, M. Minale, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech. 78, 227 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    G.I. Taylor, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 138, 41 (1932)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J.M. Rallison, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 16, 45 (1984)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    H.A. Stone, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 26, 65 (1994)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Tjahjadi, J.M. Ottino, H.A. Stone, AIChE J. 40, 385 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    K. Moran, A. Yeung, J. Masliyah, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 267, 483 (2003)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Abramowitz, I.A. Stegun (Editors), Handbook of Mathematical Functions (Dover, 1965)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. Happel, H. Brenner, Low Reynolds Number Hydrodynamics (Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1965)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    R.A. Sampson, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 182, 449 (1891)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    A.Y. Rednikov, S.S. Sadhal, J. Fluid Mech. 499, 345 (2004)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© EDP Sciences, Società Italiana di Fisica and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.TIPs LaboratoryUniversité libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.Aerospace & Mech. EngineeringUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations