Advertisement

The European Physical Journal E

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 345–357 | Cite as

The interplay between screening properties and colloid anisotropy: Towards a reliable pair potential for disc-like charged particles

  • R. Agra
  • E. TrizacEmail author
  • L. Bocquet
Article

Abstract.

The electrostatic potential of a highly charged disc (clay platelet) in an electrolyte is investigated in detail. The corresponding non-linear Poisson-Boltzmann (PB) equation is solved numerically, and we show that the far-field behaviour (relevant for colloidal interactions in dilute suspensions) is exactly that obtained within linearized PB theory, with the surface boundary condition of a uniform potential. The latter linear problem is solved by a new semi-analytical procedure and both the potential amplitude (quantified by an effective charge) and potential anisotropy coincide closely within PB and linearized PB, provided the disc bare charge is high enough. This anisotropy remains at all scales; it is encoded in a function that may vary over several orders of magnitude depending on the azimuthal angle under which the disc is seen. The results allow to construct a pair potential for discs interaction, that is strongly orientation dependent.

PACS.

82.70.-y Disperse systems; complex fluids 82.70.Kj Emulsions and suspensions 83.80.Kn Physical gels and microgels 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. Mourchid, A. Delville, J. Lambard, E. Lécolier, P. Levitz, Langmuir 11, 1942 (1995)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. Bonn, H. Kellay, H. Tanaka, G. Wegdam, J. Meunier, Langmuir 15, 7534 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    T. Nicolai, S. Coccard, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 244, 51 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. Trizac, L. Bocquet, R. Agra, J.-J. Weis, M. Aubouy, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 14, 9339 (2002).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    F. Cousin, V. Cabuil, P. Levitz, Langmuir 18, 1466 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    L.J. Michot, J. Ghanbaja, V. Tirtaatmadja, P.J. Scales, Langmuir 17, 2100 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. Rowan, J.-P. Hansen, Langmuir 18, 2063 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. van der Beek, H.N.W. Lekkerkerker, Europhys. Lett. 61, 702 (2003).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    These colloidal discs bear a negative bare charge. They have a radius of approximately 15 nm and a thickness smaller than 1 nm, see, e.g., Laponite technical report, Southern Clay Products Inc., Laporte plc. The results reported here correspond to a positive bare charge. They immediately transpose to the Laponite case by a change of sign.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    L. Belloni, Colloids Surf. A 140, 227 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J.-P. Hansen, H. Löwen, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 51, 209 (2000).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Y. Levin, Rep. Prog. Phys. 65, 1577 (2002).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    F. Oosawa, Polyelectrolytes (Dekker, New York, 1971).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. Chapot, L. Bocquet, E. Trizac, J. Chem. Phys 120, 3969 (2004).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    E. Trizac, L. Bocquet, M. Aubouy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 248301 (2002)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    D. Andelman in Membranes, their Structure and Conformation, edited by R. Lipowsky, E. Sackmann (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1996).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. Aubouy, E. Trizac, L. Bocquet, J. Phys. A 36, 5835 (2003). ADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    From equation (eq:gamma), highly charged means in practice $\sigma \gg \kappa e /\lb$.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    J.D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1975).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    E. Trizac, J.P. Hansen, Phys. Rev. E 56, 3137 (1997).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    L.D. Landau, E.M. Lifschitz, Electrodynamics of Continuous Media (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1984).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    R.J.F. Leote de Carvalho, E. Trizac, J.-P. Hansen, Europhys. Lett. 43, 369 (1998).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    The existence of a given direction along which the effective charge may be directly measured is a specific feature of macroions with vanishing internal volume. In general, as happens for a disc of finite thickness, the anisotropy function $f$ differs from unity in all directions. It is consequently more difficult ---and to some extent arbitrary--- to disentangle effective charge effects from those due to anisotropy.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    S. Alexander, P.M. Chaikin, P. Grant, G.J. Morales, P. Pincus, J. Chem. Phys. 80, 5776 (1984).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    We are interested here again in the far-field behaviour. For $\kappa =0$ (no electrolyte), a disc and a sphere behave identically, as a usual monopole.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    G.V. Ramanathan, J. Chem. Phys. 88, 3887 (1988).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    R.R. Netz, Eur. Phys. J. E 5, 557 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    A similar conclusion is reached in R.D. Groot, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 9191 (1991).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    G.L. Gouy, J. Phys. 9, 457 (1910).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    G. Téllez, E. Trizac, Phys. Rev. E 70, 011404 (2004).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    R. Agra, F. van Wijland, E. Trizac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 018304 (2004).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    W.D. Collins, Mathematika 6, 120 (1959).zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    I.N. Sneddon, M. Lowengrub, Crack Problems in the Classical Theory of Elasticity (John Wiley, New York, 1969).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    H. Lamb, Hydrodynamics, 6th ed. (Cambridge University Press, 1932).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    E.C. Titchmarsh, Introduction to the Theory of Fourier Integrals, 2nd ed. (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1948).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    I.N. Sneddon, Mixed Boundary Value Problems in Potential Theory (North Holland, 1966).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© EDP Sciences, Società Italiana di Fisica and Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratoire de Physique ThéoriqueUniversité de Paris XIOrsay CédexFrance
  2. 2.Laboratoire de Physique de la Matière Condensée et NanostructuresUniversité Lyon 1VilleurbanneFrance

Personalised recommendations