Advertisement

The European Physical Journal D

, Volume 48, Issue 3, pp 383–388 | Cite as

Transmission of ∼10 keV electron beams through thin ceramic foils: Measurements and Monte Carlo simulations of electron energy distribution functions

  • A. MorozovEmail author
  • T. Heindl
  • C. Skrobol
  • J. Wieser
  • R. Krücken
  • A. Ulrich
Plasma Physics

Abstract.

Electron beams with particle energy of ~10 keV were sent through 300 nm thick ceramic (Si3N4 + SiO2) foils and the resulting electron energy distribution functions were recorded using a retarding grid technique. The results are compared with Monte Carlo simulations performed with two publicly available packages, Geant4 and Casino v2.42. It is demonstrated that Geant4, unlike Casino, provides electron energy distribution functions very similar to the experimental distributions. Both simulation packages provide a quite precise average energy of transmitted electrons: we demonstrate that the maximum uncertainty of the calculated values of the average energy is 6% for Geant4 and 8% for Casino, taking into account all systematic uncertainties and the discrepancies in the experimental and simulated data.

PACS.

52.65.Pp Monte Carlo methods 52.70.Nc Particle measurements 29.30.Dn Electron spectroscopy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. Wieser, D.E. Murnick, A. Ulrich, H.A. Huggins, A. Liddle, W.L. Brown, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 68, 1360 (1997) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. A. Ulrich, C. Nießl, J. Wieser, H. Tomizawa, D.E. Murnick, M. Salvermoser, J. Appl. Phys. 86, 3525 (1999) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. A. Fedenev, A. Morozov, R. Krucken, S. Schoop, J. Wieser, A. Ulrich, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 37, 1586 (2004) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. A. Morozov, R. Krücken, J. Wieser, A. Ulrich, Eur. Phys. J. D 33, 207 (2005) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. A. Morozov, R. Krücken, A. Ulrich, J. Wieser, T. McCarthy, J. Chem. Phys. 123, 234311 (2005) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. A. Morozov, R. Krücken, T. Ottenthal, A. Ulrich, J. Wieser, Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 011502 (2005) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. A. Morozov, R. Krücken, A. Ulrich, J. Wieser, J. Appl. Phys. 100, 093305 (2006) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. A. Morozov, T. Heindl, J. Wieser, R. Krücken, A. Ulrich, Eur. Phys. J. D 46, 51 (2008) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. A. Morozov, T. Heindl, J. Wieser, R. Krücken, A. Ulrich, J. Appl. Phys. 103, 103301 (2008) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. S. Agostinelli et al., Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. A 506, 250 (2003) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. J. Allison et al., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53, 270 (2006) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. P. Hovington, D. Drouin, R. Gauvin, Scanning 19, 1 (1997) Google Scholar
  13. D. Drouin, A.R. Couture, D. Joly, X. Tastet, V. Aimez, R. Gauvin, Scanning 29, 92 (2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. K. Amako et al., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 52, 910 (2005) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. K.G. McKay, Phys. Rev. 61, 708 (1942) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© EDP Sciences/Società Italiana di Fisica/Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Morozov
    • 1
    Email author
  • T. Heindl
    • 1
  • C. Skrobol
    • 1
  • J. Wieser
    • 2
  • R. Krücken
    • 1
  • A. Ulrich
    • 1
  1. 1.Physik Department E12Technische Universität MünchenGarchingGermany
  2. 2.Coherent GmbH, Zielstattstrasse 32MünchenGermany

Personalised recommendations