The European Physical Journal D

, Volume 45, Issue 3, pp 485–489 | Cite as

Predicting experimental signatures for the oxidation of magnesia supported palladium clusters by density functional theory

  • B. HuberEmail author
  • M. Moseler
Electronic and Optical Properties, Chemistry


We showed in a recent density functional study that small palladium cluster on a MgO surface with F-centers can be oxidized to epitaxial PdxOy nano-oxides below room temperature [1]. Here, we employ density functional theory in order to explore different methods for an experimental verification of the PdxOy formation. The electronic density of states (DOS) of bare, O2-decorated and of oxidized palladium cluster was calculated. For many cluster sizes a clear difference in the DOS could be observed allowing for a detection of the oxidation with surface sensitive spectroscopic methods. In addition, adsorption sites and stretch frequencies of a single CO molecule on bare and oxidized Pd4 clusters were calculated. While CO prefers hollow sites on Pd4, top adsorption sites are found for Pd4O2. Markedly different CO stretch frequencies indicate a possible discrimination of bare clusters and oxides by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy.


68.43.Fg Adsorbate structure (binding sites, geometry) 68.47.Jn Clusters on oxide surfaces 73.22.-f Electronic structure of nanoscale materials: clusters, nanoparticles, nanotubes, and nanocrystals 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. B. Huber, P. Koskinen, H. Häkkinen, M. Moseler, Nature Materials 5, 44 (2006) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. R.M. Lambert, G. Pacchioni, in Chemisorption and Reactivity on Supported Clusters and Thin Films (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1997), pp. 395–424 Google Scholar
  3. H. Grönbeck, Top. Catalys. 28, 59 (2004) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. U. Heiz, W.D. Schneider, in Metal Clusters at Surfaces (Springer, Berlin, 2000), pp. 237–273 Google Scholar
  5. C. Becker, C.R. Henry, Surf. Sci. 352, 457 (1996) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. H.J. Freund, Adv. Catal. 45, 333 (2000) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. S.H. Shaikhutdinov et al., Surf. Sci. 501, 270 (2002) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. J. Mizei, J. Voutilainen, S. Saukko, V. Lantto, Thin Solid Films 391, 209 (2001) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. M. Westphalen, U. Kreibig, J. Rostalski, H. Luth, D. Meissner, Sol. Ener. Mater. Sol. Cells. 61, 97 (2000) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. S. Fukami, A. Ohno, A. Tanaka, Mater. Trans. 45, 2012 (2004) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. U. Heiz, A. Sanchez, S. Abbet, W.D. Schneider, Chem. Phys. 262, 189 (2000) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. S. Abbet, A. Sanchez, U. Heiz, W.D. Schneider, A.M. Ferrari, G. Pacchioni, N. Rösch, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 3453 (2000) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. S. Abbet, U. Heiz, H. Häkkinen, U. Landman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5950 (2001) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. A. Eichler, F. Mittendorfer, J. Hafner, Phys. Rev. B 62, 4744 (2000) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. B. Huber, H. Häkkinen, U. Landman, M. Moseler, Comp. Mat. Sci. 35, 371 (2006) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. P. Mars, D.W. van Krevelen, Chem. Eng. Sci. 3, 41 (1954) Google Scholar
  17. L.N. Kantorovich, A.L. Shluger, P.V. Sushko, J. Günster, P. Stracke, D.W. Goodman, V. Kempter, Faraday Discuss. 114, 173 (1999) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. A.S. Wörz, K. Judai, S. Abbet, U. Heiz, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 7964 (2003) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. R.N. Barnett, U. Landman, Phys. Rev. B 48, 2081 (1993) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  20. J.P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. N. Troullier, J.L. Martins, Phys. Rev. B 43, 1993 (1991) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. The error caused by the finiteness of the Mg13O12 cluster was estimated by calculating the structure and binding energy of a Pd atom on the relevant O top positions of a defect-free Mg13O13 and Mg25O25 cluster. Neither the distance of the adsorption site from the centre nor the size of the substrate had a remarkable influence on the binding position of the Pd atom. Furthermore, the variation of binding energies was less than 5% indicating that finite size errors can be safely neglected Google Scholar
  23. S. Abbet, E. Riedo, H. Brune, U. Heiz, A.M. Ferrari, L. Giordano, G. Pacchioni, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 6172 (2001) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. M. Moseler, B. Huber, H. Häkkinen, U. Landman, G. Wrigge, M.A. Hoffmann, B. von Issendorff, Phys. Rev. B 68, 165413 (2003) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© EDP Sciences/Società Italiana di Fisica/Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fraunhofer Institut für WerkstoffmechanikFreiburgGermany
  2. 2.Freiburg Materials Research Center, Stefan-Meier-Straße 21FreiburgGermany

Personalised recommendations