Advertisement

Photoionization of H atoms in few-cycle laser pulses

  • X. M. Zhang
  • J. T. ZhangEmail author
  • R. X. Li
  • Q. H. Gong
  • Z. Z. Xu
Ultraintense and Ultrashort Laser Fields

Abstract.

Photoionization of hydrogen atoms in few-cycle laser pulses is studied numerically. The total ionization probability, the instantaneous ionization probability, and the partial ionization probabilities in a pair of opposite directions are obtained. The partial ionization probabilities are not always equal to each other which is termed as inversion asymmetry. The variation of asymmetry degree with the CE phase, the pulse duration and the pulse intensity is studied. It is found that the pulse intensity affects the asymmetry degree in many aspects. Firstly, the asymmetry is more distinct at higher intensities than that at lower intensities when the pulse duration exceeds 4 cycles; secondly, the maximal asymmetry in lower intensities varies with the CE phase visibly while at higher intensities not; thirdly, the partial ionization probabilities equal to each other for some special CE phases. For lower pulse intensities, the corresponding value of CE phase is always 0.5π and 1.5π, while for higher pulse intensities, the corresponding value varies with the pulse intensity. Similar phenomena were observed in a recent experiment using few-cycle radio-frequency (RF) pulses.

Keywords

Hydrogen Atom Lower Intensity Pulse Duration Recent Experiment Quantum Computing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. T. Brabec, F. Krausz, Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 545 (2000) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. Ch. Spielman, N.H. Burnett, S. Sartania, R. Koppitsch, M. Schnürer, C. Kan, M. Lenzner, P. Wobrauschek, F. Krausz, Science 278, 661 (1997) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. G. Steinmeyer, D.H. Sutter, L. Gallman, N. Matuschek, U. Keller, Science 286, 1507 (1999) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Zhinan Zeng, Ruxin Li, Wei Yu, ZhiZhan Xu, Phys. Rev. A 67, 013815 (2003) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. A. de Bohan, Ph. Antonie, D.B. Milošević, B. Piraux, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1837 (1998) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. P. Dietrich, F. Krausz, P.B. Corkum, Opt. Lett. 25, 16 (2000) ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. Jingtao Zhang, Xunli Feng, D.-S. Guo, Zhizhan Xu, Phys. Rev. A 69, 043409 (2004) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. D.B. Milošević, G.G. Paulus, W. Becker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 153001 (2002) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. G.G. Paulus, F. Grasbon, H. Walther, P. Villoresi, M. Nisoli, S. Stagira, E. Priori, S. De Silvestri, Nature 414, 182 (2001) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. A. Baltuška, Th. Udem, M. Uiberacker, M. Hentschel, E. Goulielmakis, Ch. Gohle, R. Holzwarth, V.S. Yakovlev, A. Scrinzi, T.W. Hänsch, F. Krausz, Nature 421, 611 (2003) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. A. Gürtler, E. Robicheaux, W.J. van der Zande, L.D. Noordam, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 033002 (2004) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. S. Chelkowski, A.D. Bandrauk, Phys. Rev. A 65, 061802 (2002). S. Chelkowski, A.D. Bandrauk, A. Apolonski, Phys. Rev. A 70, 013815 (2004) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. C. Lemell, X.M. Tong, F. Krausz, J. Burgdörfer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 076403 (2003) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. V. Roudnev, B.D. Esry, I. Ben-Itzhak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 163601 (2004) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. Q. Su, J.H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. A 43, 2474 (1991) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. Suxing Hu, Zhizhan Xu, Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 1065 (1997) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. R.M. Potvliege, N.J. Kylstra, C.J. Joachain, J. Phys. B 33, L743 (2000) Google Scholar
  18. P.H. Bucksbaum, M. Bashkansky, D.W. Schumacher, Phys. Rev. A 37, 3615 (1988) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. I.P. Christov, Opt. Lett. 24, 1425 (1999) ADSGoogle Scholar
  20. G.G. Paulus, F. Lindner, H. Walther, A. Baltuška, E. Goulielmakis, M. Lezius, F. Krausz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 253004 (2003) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. F. Lindner, G.G. Paulus, H. Walther, A. Baltuška, E. Goulielmakis, M. Lezius, F. Krausz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 113001 (2004) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. Jingtao Zhang, Zhizhan Xu, Phys. Rev. A 68, 013402 (2003); Jingtao Zhang, Shaohui Li, Zhizhan Xu, Phys. Rev. A 69, 053410 (2004) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  23. G. Duchateau, E. Cormier, H. Bachau, R. Gayet, Phys. Rev. A 63, 053411 (2001) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  24. D.-S. Guo, Jingtao Zhang, Zhizhan Xu, Xiaofeng Li, Panming Fu, R.R. Freeman, Phys. Rev. A 68, 043404 (2003) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© EDP Sciences/Società Italiana di Fisica/Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • X. M. Zhang
    • 1
  • J. T. Zhang
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • R. X. Li
    • 3
  • Q. H. Gong
    • 1
  • Z. Z. Xu
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Physics, Peking UniversityState Key Laboratory for Mesoscopic PhysicsBeijingP.R. China
  2. 2.CCAST (World Laboratory)BeijingP.R. China
  3. 3.State Key Laboratory of High Field Laser Physics, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of SciencesShanghaiP.R. China

Personalised recommendations