Advertisement

Significance calculation and a new analysis method in searching for new physics at the LHC

  • Yongsheng GaoEmail author
  • Liang Lu
  • Xinlei Wang
Experimental Physics

Abstract.

The LHC experiments have great potential in discovering many possible new particles up to the TeV scale. The significance calculation of an observation of a physics signal with known location and shape is no longer valid when either the location or the shape of the signal is unknown. We find the current LHC significance calculation of new physics is over-estimated and strongly depends on the specifics of the method and the situation it applies to. We describe general procedures for significance calculation and comparing different search schemes. A new method uses maximum likelihood fits with floating parameters and scans the parameter space for the best fit to the entire sample. We find that the new method is significantly more sensitive than current method and is insensitive to the exact location of the new physics signal we search.

Keywords

Field Theory Elementary Particle Quantum Field Theory Parameter Space Search Scheme 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Particle Data Group, S. Eidelman et al. , Phys. Lett. B 592, 1 (2004)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    ATLAS Collaboration, ATLAS Detector and Physics Performance: Technical Design Report, 2, CERN-LHCC-99-015, ATLAS-TDR-15Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    ATLAS notes on searching for new particles at the LHC, available at CERN Document Server http:/ cdsweb.cern.ch/, for example, ATL-PHYS-2003-005 by S. Asai et al.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    CMS notes on searching for new particles at the LHC, available at CERN Document Server http:/ cdsweb.cern.ch/, for example, CMS-NOTE-2003-033 by S. Abdullin et al.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Y. Gao, New Analysis Strategy to Search for New Particles at LHC, hep-ex/0310011Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E.L. Lehmann, A Theory of some Multiple Decision Problems, Ann. Math. Stat., 28(1), 1 (1957)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. O'Neill and G.B. Wetherill, The Present State of Multiple Comparison Methods, J. R. Stat. Soc. B, Methodol., 33(2), 218 (1971)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liang Lu, Ph.D thesis, Southern Methodist University; the detailed results of this work are described in this thesisGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    The R Project for Statistical Computing, http:/ www.r-project.org/Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    B. Venables, An Introduction to R, ISBN 3-900051-12-7Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. Ripley, R Data Import/Export, ISBN 3-900051-10-0Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    An Introduction to SAS, http:/ www.itc.virginia.edu research sas training/v8/Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Documentation for MathWorks Products, Release 14 with Service Pack 2, http:/ www.mathworks.com/Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    W. Verkerke, D. Kirkby, The RooFit Toolkit for Data Modeling, http:/ roofit.sourceforge.net/Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Private communication with D. Kirkby and W. Verkerke, authors of the RooFit packageGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Southern Methodist UniversityDallasUSA

Personalised recommendations