Advertisement

Deep inelastic scattering and forward \(\pi^0\) production at NLO

  • P. Aurenche
  • Rahul Basu
  • M. Fontannaz
  • R. M. Godbole
Theoretical Physics

Abstract.

We present a detailed phenomenological study of forward hadron (\(\pi^0\)) production in deep inelastic scattering, with both the direct and the resolved contributions calculated to NLO accuracy. A comparison of the theoretical predictions for the various distributions with the H1 data and a study of the stability of the QCD predictions under changes of scales is the focus of this study. We obtain a very good overall description of the recent H1 data with the choice of scale \(Q^2 + E^2_\bot\), in contrast to the \((Q^2 + E^2_\bot)/2\) required earlier when the resolved contribution was included only at LO accuracy. We find a more modest variation of the predictions, as the scale is changed from \((Q^2 + E^2_\bot)/2\) to \(2(Q^2 + E^2_\bot)\), as compared to the case where the resolved contribution was included only at LO accuracy. This variation is of the order of the rather large experimental errors. Unfortunately, this fact prevents us from concluding that perturbation theory gives an unambiguous prediction for forward particle production in deep inelastic scattering. However, the overall success of perturbative QCD in explaining the small xBj data means that perhaps a full resummation of the BFKL ladder is not called for. We notice the need for rather large resolved contributions to explain the data at low xBj even at somewhat larger Q2 values.

Keywords

Inelastic Scattering Particle Production Deep Inelastic Scattering Phenomenological Study Modest Variation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    H1 Collaboration, A. Aktas et al. , Eur. Phys. J. C 36, 441 (2004) [hep-ex/0404009]Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    H1 Collaboration, C. Adloff et al. , Phys. Lett. B 462, 440 (1999) [hep-ex/9907030]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    H1 Collaboration, (1996); (1997); (1997); C. Adloff et al. , Nucl. Phys. B 538, 3 (1999) [hep-ex/9809028]Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    ZEUS Collaboration, M. Derrick et al. , Z. Phys. C 68, 29 (1995) [hep-ex/9505011]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    ZEUS Collaboration, J. Breitweg et al. , Eur. Phys. J. C 11, 251 (1999) [hep-ex/9903056]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    H1 Collaboration, A. Aktas et al. , Eur. Phys. J. C 37, 141 (2004) [hep-ex/0401010]Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    ZEUS Collaboration, J. Breitweg et al. , Eur. Phys. J. C 6, 239 (1999) [hep-ex/9805016]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    ZEUS Collaboration. J. Breitweg et al. , Phys. Lett. B 479, 37 (2000) [hep-ex/0002010]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A.L. Mueller, Nucl. Phys. (Proc. Suppl.) B 18c, 125 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    E.A. Kuraev, L.N. Lipatov, V.S. Fadin, Sov. Phys. JETP 45, 199 (1977); I.I. Balitsky, L.N. Lipatov, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 28, 822 (1978).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    V.N. Gribov, L.N. Lipatov, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 15, 438, 675 (1972); L.N. Lipatov, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 20, 94 (1975); G. Altarelli, G. Parisi, Nucl. Phys. B 126, 298 (1977); Y.L. Dokshitzer, Sov. Phys. JETP 46, 641 (1977).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. Ingelman, A. Edin, J. Rathsman, Comp. Phys. Comm. 101, 108 (1997) [hep-ph/9605286]Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. Jung, Comp. Phys. Comm. 86, 147 (1995).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Kwieciński, A.D. Martin, J.J. Outhwaite, Eur. Phys. J. C 9, 611 (1999) [hep-ph/9903439]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Daleo, C.A. Garcia Canal, R. Sassot, Nucl. Phys. B 662, 334 (2003) [hep-ph/0303199]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. Daleo, D. de Florian, R. Sassot, hep-ph/0411212; A. Daleo, C.A. Garcia Canal, R. Sassot, Eur. Phys. J. C 33, 404 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    P. Aurenche, R. Basu, M. Fontannaz, R.M. Godbole, Eur. Phys. J. C 34, 277 (2004) [hep-ph/0312359]Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    B.A. Kniehl, G. Kramer, M. Maniatis, hep-ph/0411300Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. Fontannaz, Eur. Phys. J. C 38, 297 (2004) [hep-ph/0410021]Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. Drees, R.M. Godbole, J. Phys. G 21, 1559 (1995) [hep-ph/9508221]Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    M. Glück, E. Reya, M. Stratmann, Phys. Rev. D 51, 3220 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    M. Glück, E. Reya, I. Schienbein, Phys. Rev. D 60, 054019 (1999) [Erratum D 62, 019902 (2000)] [hep-ph/9903337]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    J. Chyla, M. Tasevsky, Phys. Rev. D 62, 114025 (2000) [hep-ph/9912514]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    A.D. Martin, R.G. Roberts, W.J. Stirling, R.S. Thorne, Eur. Phys. J. C 23, 73 (2002) [hep-ph/0110215]Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    J. Pumplin, D.R. Stump, J. Huston, H.L. Lai, P. Nadolsky, W.K. Tung, JHEP 0207, 012 (2002) [hep-ph/0201195]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    B.A. Kniehl, G. Kramer, B. Pötter, Nucl. Phys. B 582, 514 (2000) [hep-ph/0010289]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    S. Kretzer, Phys. Rev. D 62, 054001 (2000) [hep-ph/0003177]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    G. Kramer, B. Pötter, Phys. Lett. B 453, 295 (1999) [hep-ph/9901314]Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    H. Jung, L. Jonsson, H. Kuster, Eur. Phys. J. C 9, 383 (1999) [hep-ph/9903306]Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    L. Bourhis, M. Fontannaz, J.P. Guillet, M. Werlen, Eur. Phys. J. C 19, 89 (2001) [hep-ph/0009101]Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    M. Fontannaz, J.P. Guillet, G. Heinrich, Eur. Phys. J. C 26, 209 (2002) [hep-ph/0206202]Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    L.H. Orr, W.J. Stirling, Phys. Rev. D 56, 5875 (1997) [hep-ph/9706529]Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    J.R. Andersen, Acta Phys. Polon. B 33, 3001 (2002) [hep-ph/0207019]Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin/Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Aurenche
    • 1
  • Rahul Basu
    • 2
  • M. Fontannaz
    • 3
  • R. M. Godbole
    • 4
  1. 1.Laboratoire d’Annecy-le-Vieux de Physique Théorique LAPTHAnnecy-le-Vieux CedexFrance
  2. 2.The Institute of Mathematical SciencesChennai India
  3. 3.Université Paris XI,Laboratoire de Physique Théorique, UMR 8627 CNRSOrsay CedexFrance
  4. 4.Indian Institute of Science,Center for High Energy PhysicsBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations