Advertisement

The European Physical Journal C

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 477–486 | Cite as

Triple gauge vertices at one-loop level in two-Higgs-doublet model

  • M. MalinskýEmail author
  • J. Hořejší
theoretical physics

Abstract.

Renormalized triple gauge vertices (TGV) are examined within the two-Higgs-doublet model of the electroweak interactions. Deviations of the TGV from their standard-model values are calculated at the one-loop level, in the on-shell renormalization scheme. As a consistency check, UV divergence cancellations anticipated on symmetry grounds are verified explicitly. The dependence of the TGV finite parts on the masses of possible heavy Higgs scalars is discussed briefly.

Keywords

Consistency Check Renormalization Scheme Electroweak Interaction Finite Part Higgs Scalar 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    T.D. Lee, Phys. Rev. D 8, 1226 (1973)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Sher, Phys. Rept. 179, 273 (1989)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    E.O. Iltan, Phys. Rev. D 65, 036003 (2002) [hep-ph/0108230]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Krawczyk, Acta Phys. Polon. B 33, 2621 (2002) [hep-ph/0208076]ADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J.F. Gunion, H.E. Haber, Phys. Rev. D 67, 075019 (2003) [hep-ph/0207010]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Kanemura, S. Kiyoura, Y. Okada, E. Senaha, C.P. Yuan, Phys. Lett. B 558, 157 (2003) [hep-ph/0211308]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R.A.D. Sanchez, Ph.D. thesis [hep-ph/0212237]Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. Appelquist, J. Carazzone, Phys. Rev. D 11, 2856 (1975)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Dobado, M.J. Herrero, S. Penaranda, Eur. Phys. J. C 17, 487 (2000) [hep-ph/0002134]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. Kanemura, H.A. Tohyama, Phys. Rev. D 57, 2949 (1998) [hep-ph/9707454]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J.M. Cornwall, D.N. Levin, G. Tiktopoulos, Phys. Rev. D 10, 1145 (1974) [Erratum D 11, 972 (1975)]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Malinský, J. Hořejší, \(e^+ e^- \to W^+ W^-\) in THDM, in preparationGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Malinský, Acta Phys. Slov. 52, 259 (2002) [hep-ph/0207066]Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J.F. Gunion, H.E. Haber, G.L. Kane, S. Dawson, The Higgs hunter’s guide (Perseus Publishing, Cambridge, Massachusetts 2000)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    S. Pokorski, Gauge field theories, 2nd edition (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2000)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. Bohm, A. Denner, T. Sack, W. Beenakker, F.A. Berends, H. Kuijf, Nucl. Phys. B 304, 463 (1988)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    G. Passarino, M.J. Veltman, Nucl. Phys. B 160, 151 (1979)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    D.Y. Bardin, G. Passarino, The standard model in the making: Precision study of the electroweak interactions (Clarendon, Oxford, UK 1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin/Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IPNP, Faculty of Mathematics and PhysicsCharles UniversityPragueCzech Republic
  2. 2.S.I.S.S.A.TriesteItaly

Personalised recommendations