Advertisement

Revealing Bell’s nonlocality for unstable systems in high energy physics

  • Beatrix C. Hiesmayr
  • Antonio Di Domenico
  • Catalina Curceanu
  • Andreas Gabriel
  • Marcus Huber
  • Jan-Åke Larsson
  • Pawel Moskal
Open Access
Letter
First Online:

Abstract

Entanglement and its consequences—in particular the violation of Bell inequalities, which defies our concepts of realism and locality—have been proven to play key roles in Nature by many experiments for various quantum systems. Entanglement can also be found in systems not consisting of ordinary matter and light, i.e. in massive meson–antimeson systems. Bell inequalities have been discussed for these systems, but up to date no direct experimental test to conclusively exclude local realism was found. This mainly stems from the fact that one only has access to a restricted class of observables and that these systems are also decaying. In this Letter we put forward a Bell inequality for unstable systems which can be tested at accelerator facilities with current technology. Herewith, the long awaited proof that such systems at different energy scales can reveal the sophisticated “dynamical” nonlocal feature of Nature in a direct experiment gets feasible. Moreover, the role of entanglement and \(\mathcal{CP}\) violation, an asymmetry between matter and antimatter, is explored, a special feature offered only by these meson–antimeson systems.

Keywords

Entangle State Bell Inequality Accelerator Facility Neutral Kaon Conclusive Test 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Download to read the full article text

References

  1. 1.
    J. Bell, On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Physics 1, 195–200 (1964) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Aspect et al., Experimental tests of realistic local theories via Bell’s theorem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 460–463 (1981) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. Weihs, T. Jennewein, C. Simon, H. Weinfurter, A. Zeilinger, Violation of Bell’s inequality under strict Einstein locality conditions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5039–5043 (1998) MathSciNetADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M.A. Rowe et al., Experimental violation of a Bell’s inequality with efficient detectors. Nature 409, 791–794 (2001) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Ansmann et al., Violation of Bell’s inequality in Josephson phase qubits. Nature 461, 504–506 (2009) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Y. Hasegawa, R. Loidl, G. Badurek, M. Baron, H. Rauch, Violation of a Bell-like inequality in single-neutron interferometry. Nature 425, 45–47 (2003) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R.A. Bertlmann, B.C. Hiesmayr, Bell inequalities for entangled kaons and their unitary time evolution. Phys. Rev. A 63, 062112 (2001) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    B.C. Hiesmayr, Nonlocality and entanglement in a strange system. Eur. Phys. J. C 50, 73 (2007) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    R.A. Bertlmann, A. Bramon, G. Garbarino, B.C. Hiesmayr, A Bell inequality in high energy physics really experimentally violated? Phys. Lett. A 332, 355 (2004) ADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    G.C. Ghiradi, A. Rimini, T. Weber, The puzzling entanglement of Schrödingers wavefunction. Found. Phys. 18, 1 (1988) MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    B.C. Hiesmayr, A generalized Bell inequality and decoherence for the K0 anti-K0 system. Found. Phys. Lett. 14, 231 (2001) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Bramon, R. Escribano, G. Garbarino, Bell’s inequality tests with meson–antimeson pairs. Found. Phys. 26, 563 (2006) MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Bramon, R. Escribano, G. Garbarino, Bell’s inequality tests: from photons to B-mesons. J. Mod. Opt. 52, 1681 (2005) ADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Li, C.F. Qiao, New possibilities for testing local realism in high energy physics. Phys. Lett. A 373, 4311 (2009) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Genovese, C. Novero, E. Predazzi, On the conlusive tests of local realism and pseudoscalar mesons. Found. Phys. 32, 589 (2002) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. Bramon, G. Garbarino, B.C. Hiesmayr, Active and passive quantum eraser for neutral kaons. Phys. Rev. A 69, 062111 (2004) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. Bramon, G. Garbarino, B.C. Hiesmayr, Quantum marking and quantum erasure for neutral kaons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 020405 (2004) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    G. Amelino-Camelia et al., Physics with the KLOE-2 experiment at the upgraded DAPHNE. Eur. Phys. J. C 68(3–4), 619 (2010) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Y. Aharonov, M.S. Zubairy, Time and the quantum: erasing the past and impacting the future. Science 307, 875–879 (2005) MathSciNetADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    R.A. Bertlmann, W. Grimus, B.C. Hiesmayr, An open–quantum–system formulation of particle decay. Phys. Rev. A 73, 054101 (2006) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    M. Czachor, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiment with relativistic massive particles. Phys. Rev. A 55, 72 (1997) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    N. Friis, R.A. Bertlmann, M. Huber, B.C. Hiesmayr, Relativistic entanglement of two massive particles. Phys. Rev. A 81, 042114 (2010) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    J.F. Clauser, M.A. Horne, A. Shimony, R.A. Holt, Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880–884 (1969) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    A. Apostolakis et al., An EPR experiment testing the non-separability of the \(K^{0} \bar{K}^{0}\) wave function. Phys. Lett. B 422, 339–348 (1998) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    A. Di Domenico, A. Gabriel, B.C. Hiesmayr, F. Hipp, M. Huber, G. Krizek, K. Muehlbacher, S. Radic, C. Spengler, L. Theussl, Heisenberg’s uncertainty relation and Bell inequalities in high energy physics. arXiv:1101.4517 (accepted by Found. Phys.). doi: 10.1007/s10701-011-9575-y
  26. 26.
    W. Rosenfeld, M. Weber, J. Volz, F. Henkel, M. Krug, A. Cabello, M. Zukowski, H. Weinfurter, Towards a loophole-free test of Bell’s inequality with entangled pairs of neutral atoms. Adv. Sci. Lett. 2, 469 (2009) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    A. Bramon, R. Escribano, G. Gabarino, A review of Bell inequality tests with neutral kaons, in Handbook on Neutral Kaon Interferometry at a Φ factory, ed. by A. Di Domenico. Frascati Physics Series, vol. XLIII (2007), pp. 217–254 Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    A. Di Domenico (KLOE Collaboration), CPT symmetry and quantum mechanics tests in the neutral kaon system at KLOE. Found. Phys. 40, 852 (2010) ADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    J.F. Clauser, M.A. Horne, Experimental consequences of objective local theories. Phys. Rev. D 10, 526–535 (1974) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    N. Gisin, A. Go, EPR test with photons and kaons: Analogies. Am. J. Phys. 69, 264–270 (2001) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    R. Foadi, F. Selleri, Quantum mechanics versus local realism for kaons. Phys. Rev. A 61, 012106 (2000) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Beatrix C. Hiesmayr
    • 1
  • Antonio Di Domenico
    • 2
  • Catalina Curceanu
    • 3
  • Andreas Gabriel
    • 1
  • Marcus Huber
    • 1
  • Jan-Åke Larsson
    • 4
  • Pawel Moskal
    • 5
  1. 1.Faculty of PhysicsUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria
  2. 2.Sapienza Università di Roma and INFN Sezione di RomaRomeItaly
  3. 3.Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati dell’INFNFrascatiItaly
  4. 4.Institionen för SystemteknikLinköpings UniversitetLinköpingSweden
  5. 5.Institute of PhysicsJagiellonian UniversityCracowPoland

Personalised recommendations