Advertisement

The European Physical Journal C

, Volume 70, Issue 4, pp 1025–1035 | Cite as

Extracting γ and penguin topologies through CP violation in \(B_{s}^{0}\to J/\psi K_{\mathrm{S}}\)

  • Kristof De Bruyn
  • Robert FleischerEmail author
  • Patrick Koppenburg
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics

Abstract

The \(B_{s}^{0}\to J/\psi K_{\mathrm{S}}\) decay has recently been observed by the CDF collaboration and will be of interest for the LHCb experiment. This channel will offer a new tool to extract the angle γ of the unitarity triangle and to control doubly Cabibbo-suppressed penguin corrections to the determination of sin 2β from the well-known \(B_{d}^{0}\to J/\psi K_{\mathrm{S}}\) mode with the help of the U-spin symmetry of strong interactions. While any competitive determination of γ is interesting, the latter aspect is particularly relevant as LHCb will enter a territory of precision which makes the control of doubly Cabibbo-suppressed Standard-Model corrections mandatory. Using the data from CDF and the e + e B factories as a guideline, we explore the sensitivity for γ and the penguin parameters and point out that the \(B_{s}^{0}\)\(\bar{B}_{s}^{0}\) mixing phase φ s , which is only about −2° in the Standard Model but may be enhanced through new physics, is a key parameter for these analyses. We find that the mixing-induced CP violation \(S(B_{s}^{0}\to J/\psi K_{\mathrm{S}})\) shows an interesting correlation with sin φ s , which serves as a target region for the first measurement of this observable at LHCb.

Keywords

Large Hadron Collider Monte Carlo LHCb Collaboration LHCb Experiment Penguin Parameter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    CDF Collaboration, CDF Note 10240, August 2010. See also http://www-cdf.fnal.gov/physics/new/bottom/100708.blessed-BsJpsiK/
  2. 2.
    R. Fleischer, Eur. Phys. J. C 10, 299 (1999). arXiv:hep-ph/9903455 ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Faller, M. Jung, R. Fleischer, T. Mannel, Phys. Rev. D 79, 014030 (2009). arXiv:0809.0842 [hep-ph] CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Ciuchini, M. Pierini, L. Silvestrini, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 221804 (2005). arXiv:hep-ph/0507290 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    LHCb Collaboration, Report CERN-LHCC-2003-030 (2003) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    LHCb Collaboration, Expression of Interest CERN-LHCB-2008-019 (2008) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. Ball, R. Fleischer, Eur. Phys. J. C 48, 413 (2006). arXiv:hep-ph/0604249 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. Wolfenstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1945 (1983) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A.J. Buras, M.E. Lautenbacher, G. Ostermaier, Phys. Rev. D 50, 3433 (1994). arXiv:hep-ph/9403384 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. Nakamura et al. (Particle Data Group), J. Phys. G 37, 075021 (2010) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    I. Dunietz, R. Fleischer, U. Nierste, Phys. Rev. D 63, 114015 (2001). arXiv:hep-ph/0012219 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A.S. Dighe, I. Dunietz, R. Fleischer, Eur. Phys. J. C 6, 647 (1999). arXiv:hep-ph/9804253 ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    CDF Collaboration, CDF/ANAL/BOTTOM/PUBLIC/10206, July 2010. See also http://www-cdf.fnal.gov/physics/new/bottom
  14. 14.
    DØ Collaboration, DØ Note 6093-CONF, July 2010. See also http://www-d0.fnal.gov/Run2Physics/WWW/results/b.htm
  15. 15.
    LHCb Collaboration, arXiv:0912.4179 [hep-ex]
  16. 16.
    R. Fleischer, N. Serra, N. Tuning, Phys. Rev. D 82, 034038 (2010). arXiv:1004.3982 [hep-ph] CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    E. Barberio et al. (Heavy Flavour Averaging Group), arXiv:0704.3575 [hep-ex]. For the most recent updates, see http://www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/hfag
  18. 18.
    R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 694, 209–216 (2010). doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2010.10.010 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    K. De Bruyn, Master thesis, University of Amsterdam, in progress Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    R. Fleischer, S. Recksiegel, Phys. Rev. D 71, 051501 (2005). arXiv:hep-ph/0409137 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    R. Fleischer, T. Mannel, Phys. Rev. D 57, 2752 (1998). arXiv:hep-ph/9704423 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    CKMfitter Collaboration, http://ckmfitter.in2p3.fr/
  23. 23.
    UTfit Collaboration, http://www.utfit.org/UTfit/
  24. 24.
    R. Fleischer, Eur. Phys. J. C 52, 267 (2007). arXiv:0705.1121 [hep-ph] CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag / Società Italiana di Fisica 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristof De Bruyn
    • 1
  • Robert Fleischer
    • 1
    Email author
  • Patrick Koppenburg
    • 1
  1. 1.NikhefAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations