Charged-particle multiplicity measurement in proton–proton collisions at \(\sqrt{s}=0.9\) and 2.36 TeV with ALICE at LHC

Abstract

Charged-particle production was studied in proton–proton collisions collected at the LHC with the ALICE detector at centre-of-mass energies 0.9 TeV and 2.36 TeV in the pseudorapidity range |η|<1.4. In the central region (|η|<0.5), at 0.9 TeV, we measure charged-particle pseudorapidity density \(\mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta=3.02\pm 0.01(\mathit{stat.})^{+0.08}_{-0.05}(\mathit{syst.})\) for inelastic interactions, and \(\mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta=3.58\pm0.01(\mathit{stat.})^{+0.12}_{-0.12}(\mathit{syst.})\) for non-single-diffractive interactions. At 2.36 TeV, we find \(\mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta=3.77\pm0.01(\mathit{stat.})^{+0.25}_{-0.12}(\mathit{syst.})\) for inelastic, and \(\mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta=4.43\pm0.01(\mathit{stat.})^{+0.17}_{-0.12}(\mathit{syst.})\) for non-single-diffractive collisions. The relative increase in charged-particle multiplicity from the lower to higher energy is \(24.7\%\pm0.5\%(\mathit{stat.})^{+5.7}_{-2.8}\%(\mathit{syst.})\) for inelastic and \(23.7\%\pm0.5\%(\mathit{stat.})^{+4.6}_{-1.1}\%(\mathit{syst.})\) for non-single-diffractive interactions. This increase is consistent with that reported by the CMS collaboration for non-single-diffractive events and larger than that found by a number of commonly used models. The multiplicity distribution was measured in different pseudorapidity intervals and studied in terms of KNO variables at both energies. The results are compared to proton–antiproton data and to model predictions.

References

  1. 1.

    ALICE Collaboration, K. Aamodt et al., J. Instrum. 3, S08002 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    ALICE Collaboration, K. Aamodt et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 65, 111 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    L. Evans, P. Bryant, J. Instrum. 3, S08001 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    CMS Collaboration, V. Khachatryan et al., J. High Energy Phys. 2010, 02041 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Phys. Lett. B 688(1), 21–42 (2010)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    A.B. Kaidalov, M.G. Poghosyan, Eur. Phys. J. C (2009, to be published). arXiv:0910.2050 [hep-ph]

  7. 7.

    T. Sjöstrand, Comput. Phys. Commun. 82, 74 (1994)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna, P. Skands, J. High Energy Phys. 2006, 05026 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    M.G. Albrow et al. (Tev4LHC QCD Working Group), arXiv:hep-ph/0610012 (2006), D6T (109) tune

  10. 10.

    A. Moraes (ATLAS Collaboration), ATLAS Note ATL-COM-PHYS-2009-119 (2009), ATLAS CSC (306) tune

  11. 11.

    P.Z. Skands, in Multi-Parton Interaction Workshop, Perugia, Italy, 28–31 Oct. 2008 (2009). arXiv:0905.3418 [hep-ph]. Perugia-0 (320) tune

  12. 12.

    R. Engel, J. Ranft, S. Roesler, Phys. Rev. D 52, 1459 (1995)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Z. Koba, H.B. Nielsen, P. Olesen, Nucl. Phys. B 40, 317 (1972)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    A. Breakstone et al., Phys. Rev. D 30, 528 (1984)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    UA5 Collaboration, G.J. Alner et al., Phys. Lett. B 167, 476 (1986)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    UA5 Collaboration, G.J. Alner et al., Phys. Lett. B 138, 304 (1984)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    UA1 Collaboration, C. Albajar et al., Nucl. Phys. B 335, 261 (1990)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    UA5 Collaboration, G.J. Alner et al., Phys. Lett. B 160, 193 (1985)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    UA5 Collaboration, R.E. Ansorge et al., Z. Phys. C 43, 357 (1989)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    CDF Collaboration, F. Rimondi et al., in 23rd Int. Symp. on Multiparticle Dynamics (1993), Aspen, Colorado, 12–17 Sep. 1993 (Word Scientific, Singapore, 1994), p. 400

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    A. Giovannini, R. Ugoccioni, Phys. Rev. D 59, 094020 (1999). Erratum Phys. Rev. D 69, 059903 (2004)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    A. Giovannini, R. Ugoccioni, Phys. Rev. D 60, 074027 (1999)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    J.F. Grosse-Oetringhaus, K. Reygers, to be published in J. Phys. G, arXiv:0912.0023 [hep-ex] (2009)

  24. 24.

    ALICE Collaboration, K. Aamodt et al., JINST 5, P03003 (2010)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    ALICE Collaboration, R. Brun et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 502, 339 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    R. Brun et al., 1985 GEANT3 User Guide, CERN Data Handling Division DD/EE/841 and 1994 CERN Program Library Long Write-up, W5013, GEANT Detector Description and Simulation Tool

  27. 27.

    UA5 Collaboration, R.E. Ansorge et al., Z. Phys. C 33, 175 (1986)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    UA4 Collaboration, D. Bernard et al., Phys. Lett. B 186, 227 (1987)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    A.B. Kaidalov, M.G. Poghosyan, arXiv:0909.5156 [hep-ph] (2009)

  30. 30.

    N.A. Amos et al., Phys. Lett. B 301, 313 (1993)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    F. Abe et al., Phys. Rev. D 50, 5535 (1994)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    S. Klimenko, J. Konigsberg, T.M. Liss, Fermilab preprint, Fermilab-FN-0741 (2003)

  33. 33.

    CDF Collaboration, T. Affolder et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 141802 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    PHOBOS Collaboration, B.B. Back et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3100 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    V. Blobel, in 8th CERN School of Comp.—CSC’84, Aiguablava, Spain, 9–22 Sep. 1984, CERN-85-09 (1985), p. 88

  36. 36.

    G. D’Agostini, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 362, 487 (1995)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    G. D’Agostini, CERN Report CERN-99-03 (1999)

  38. 38.

    J.F. Grosse-Oetringhaus, Ph.D. thesis, University of Münster, Germany, CERN-THESIS-2009-033 (2009)

  39. 39.

    G. Cowan, in Advanced Statistical Techniques in Particle Physics, Durham, England, 18–22 Mar 2002 (Durham Univ., Durham, 2002), p. 248

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    UA5 Collaboration, G.J. Alner et al., Z. Phys. C 33, 1 (1986)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    W. Thome et al., Nucl. Phys. B 129, 365 (1977)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    UA5 Collaboration, K. Alpgård et al., Phys. Lett. B 112, 183 (1982)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    M. Ambrosio et al., AIP Conf. Proc. 85, 602 (1982)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    PHOBOS Collaboration, R. Noucier et al., J. Phys. G 30, S1133 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    STAR Collaboration, B.I. Abelev et al., Phys. Rev. C 79, 034909 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    UA5 Collaboration, G.J. Alner et al., Phys. Rep. 154, 247 (1987)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    UA1 Collaboration, C. Albajar et al., Nucl. Phys. B 335, 261 (1990)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    CDF Collaboration, F. Abe et al., Phys. Rev. D 41, 2330 (1990)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Ch. Fuglesang, in Multiparticle Dynamics—Festschrift for Leon Van Hove, La Thuile, Italy, 10–22 Mar. 1989 (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989), p. 193

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Schukraft.

Additional information

This publication is dedicated to the memory of our colleague Hans-Åke Gustafsson.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.

About this article

Cite this article

The ALICE Collaboration., Aamodt, K., Abel, N. et al. Charged-particle multiplicity measurement in proton–proton collisions at \(\sqrt{s}=0.9\) and 2.36 TeV with ALICE at LHC. Eur. Phys. J. C 68, 89–108 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1339-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Large Hadron Collider
  • Systematic Uncertainty
  • Multiplicity Distribution
  • Pseudorapidity Density
  • Pseudorapidity Interval