Advertisement

The European Physical Journal B

, Volume 68, Issue 2, pp 183–192 | Cite as

Ground state energy of N Frenkel excitons

  • W. Pogosov
  • M. CombescotEmail author
Solid State and Materials

Abstract

By using the composite many-body theory for Frenkel excitons we have recently developed, we here derive the ground state energy of N Frenkel excitons in the Born approximation through the Hamiltonian mean value in a state made of N identical Q = 0 excitons. While this quantity reads as a density expansion in the case of Wannier excitons, due to many-body effects induced by fermion exchanges between N composite particles, we show that the Hamiltonian mean value for N Frenkel excitons only contains a first order term in density, just as for elementary bosons. Such a simple result comes from a subtle balance, difficult to guess a priori, between fermion exchanges for two or more Frenkel excitons appearing in Coulomb term and the ones appearing in the N exciton normalization factor – the cancellation being exact within terms in 1/Ns where Ns is the number of atomic sites in the sample. This result could make us naively believe that, due to the tight binding approximation on which Frenkel excitons are based, these excitons are just bare elementary bosons while their composite nature definitely appears at various stages in the precise calculation of the Hamiltonian mean value.

PACS

71.35.-y Excitons and related phenomena 71.35.Aa Frenkel excitons and self-trapped excitons 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M. Combescot, W.V. Pogosov, Phys. Rev. B 77, 085206 (2008) Google Scholar
  2. M. Combescot, W.V. Pogosov, Eur. Phys. J. B 68 (2009), DOI: 10.1140/epjb/e2009-00086-6 Google Scholar
  3. M. Combescot, O. Betbeder-Matibet, F. Dubin, Physics Reports 463, 215 (2008) Google Scholar
  4. V.M. Agranovich, M.D. Galanin, Electronic Excitation Energy Transfer in Condensed Matter (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1982)Google Scholar
  5. M. Hoffmann, K. Schmidt, T. Fritz, T. Hasche, V.M. Agranovich, K. Leo, Chem. Phys. 258, 73 (2000)Google Scholar
  6. V.M. Agranovich, B.S. Toshich, Sov. Phys. JETP 26, 104 (1968)Google Scholar
  7. A.S. Davydov, Theory of Molecular Excitons (Plenum Press, New York, 1971)Google Scholar
  8. V. Chernyak, S. Mukamel, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 13, 1302 (1996)Google Scholar
  9. S. Mukamel, Principles of Nonlinear Optics and Spectroscopy (Oxford University Press, 1995)Google Scholar
  10. V. Chernyak, S. Yokojima, T. Meier, S. Mukamel, Phys. Rev. B 58, 4496 (1998)Google Scholar
  11. V.M. Axt, S. Mukamel, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 145 (1998)Google Scholar
  12. D. Abramavicius, B. Palmieri, D.V. Voronine, F. Sanda, S. Mukamel, unpublishedGoogle Scholar
  13. M. Combescot, O. Betbeder-Matibet, Phys. Rev. B 78, 125206 (2008)Google Scholar
  14. M. Combescot, M.A. Dupertuis, O. Betbeder-Matibet, Europhys. Lett. 75, 17001 (2007)Google Scholar
  15. M. Combescot, O. Betbeder-Matibet, Eur. Phys. J. B 55, 63 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© EDP Sciences, SIF, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut des NanoSciences de Paris, Universite Pierre et Marie Curie, CNRSParisFrance
  2. 2.Institute for Theoretical and Applied Electrodynamics, Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations