Morphological instability induced by the interaction of a particle with a solid-liquid interface

  • L. HadjiEmail author


We show that the interaction of a particle with a directionally solidified interface induces the onset of morphological instability provided that the particle-interface distance falls below a critical value. This instability occurs at pulling velocities that are below the threshold for the onset of the Mullins-Sekerka instability. The expression for the critical distance reveals that this instability is manifested only for certain combinations of the physical and processing parameters. Its occurence is attributed to the reversal of the thermal gradient in the melt ahead of the interface and behind the particle.


Thermal Gradient Planar Interface Microgravity Environment Thermal Conductance Ratio Morphological Instability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    K.A. Jackson, B. Chalmers, J. Appl. Phys. 29, 1178 (1958)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. Ishiguro, B. Rubinsky, Cryobiology 31, 483 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. Gay, M.A. Azouni, Crystal Growth & Design 2, 135 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Endo, H.S. Chauhan, T. Egi, Y. Shiohara, J. Mater. Sci. 11, 795 (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A.R. Kennedy, T.W. Clyne, Cast Metals 4, 160 (1991)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D.R. Uhlmann, B. Chalmers, K.A. Jackson, J. Appl. Phys. 35, 2986 (1964)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A.M. Zubko, V.G. Lobanov, V.V. Nikonova, Sov. Phys. Crystallgr. 18, 239 (1973)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A.A. Chernov, D.E. Temkin, A.M. Mel’kinova, Sov. Phys. Crystallogr. 22, 656 (1977)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Sen, W.F. Faukler, P. Curreri, D.M. Stefanescu, Met. Trans. A 28, 2129 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    L. Hadji, Phys. Rev. E 64, 051502 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    The directional solidification of an alloy is subject to a morphological Mullins-Sekerka instability when the growth rate V exceeds some critical value (W.W. Mullins, R.F. Sekerka [J. Appl. Phys. 34, 323 (1963)]). The planar interface undergoes a bifurcation to a cellular state whose wavelength is determined from a competition between the destabilizing diffusion length scale and the stabilizing capillary length scale. The wavelength varies roughly between 10 and 100 µm. (I. Durand, K. Kassner, C. Misbah, H. Müller-Krumbhaar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3013 (1996)). This wavelength is of the same order of magnitude as the size of the inclusions that are used in PMMC and found in other processes. In this paper, the mere presence of the particle in the melt provides the length scale. Furthermore, the growth rates considered here are so low (ε ≪ 1) that the Mullins-Sekerka instability does not ariseADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Typically, the size of the inclusions vary between 5 µm, and 100 µm, and D ≈ 10−9 m2s−1. We have considered here very low growth rates so that the onset of the Mullins-Sekerka instability is remote and the particle remains pushed by the interface. Thus, for V ≈ 10−9 ms−1, we have ε ≈ 10−5. We assume that the perturbation to the interface profile is of order (ε). The case of a pure substance with zero growth rate has been analyzed by L. Hadji, Scripta Materialia 48, 665 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    H.S. Carslaw, J.C. Jaeger, Conduction of Heat in Solids, 2nd edn. (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1959)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    H. Cheng, L. Greengard, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 58, 122 (1998)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    W. Kurz, D.J. Fisher, Fundamentals of Solidification, 3d edn. (Trans. Tech. Publications, Switzerland, 1992)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    D.M. Stefanescu, R.V. Phalnikar, H. Pang, S. Ahuja, B.K. Dhindaw, SIJ Int. 35, 300 (1995)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A.D. Poularikas, The Transforms and Applications Handbook, 2nd edn. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 1999). The interaction of a single particle with the interface sets up a perturbation in the interface due to the difference in thermal conductivities (α ≠1). In case the instability sets in, this disturbance travels radially in all directions, decreasing in magnitude as it goes. Far away from the particle, at r = ℓ, the particle’s effect vanishes. In our calculations, we have arbitrarily chosen ℓ = 10Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. Ahuja, Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Alabama, p. 100 (1992)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    J.A. Sekhar, R. Trivedi, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 147, 9 (1991). This paper investigates the morphological stability of a solidifying interface in the presence of large number of particlesCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© EDP Sciences, Società Italiana di Fisica, Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mathematics DepartmentThe University of AlabamaTuscaloosaUSA

Personalised recommendations