Collective excitations involving spin and isospin degrees of freedom
- 24 Downloads
Abstract.
In this paper, we discuss some new important developments in the study of isobaric analog states (IAS) and Gamow-Teller resonances (GTR). In the case of the IAS, we have shown the importance of taking into account charge symmetry breaking (CSB) and charge independence breaking (CIB) forces, in order to reconcile the reproduction of the IAS energy in 208Pb with the reproduction of some very basic observables like the neutron skin which, in turn, is strongly correlated with the density dependence of the symmetry energy. Isospin symmetry breaking terms can increase the energy of the IAS associated with Skyrme EDFs that produce a reasonable value of the neutron skin. In particular, this has been shown in the case of the SAMi functional. The GTR has a large damping width and its strength is experimentally found to be quenched with respect to standard RPA calculations. We have revised the PVC model for the width of giant resonances using the Skyrme force consistently for RPA (QRPA) and (quasi-)particle-vibration couplings (PVC or QPVC) calculations. We apply this model to the study of the GTR both in magic and open-shell nuclei. The results are in very good agreement with the experimental findings. The remaining discrepancies point to the necessity of fine tuning of the spin, spin-isospin, and spin-orbit terms in the existing EDFs. Some detailed formulas of CSB and CIB energy densities are given in the appendix.
References
- 1.A. Bohr, B.R. Mottelson, Nuclear Structure, Vol. I (World Scientific, 1969)Google Scholar
- 2.N. Auerbach, J. Hfner, A.K. Kerman, C.M. Shakin, Rev. Mod. Phys. 44, 48 (1972)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 3.M.N. Harakeh, A. Woude, Giant Resonances: Fundamental High-Frequency Modes of Nuclear Excitation (Oxford University Press, London, 2001)Google Scholar
- 4.M. Ichimura, H. Sakai, Wakasa, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 56, 446 (2006)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 5.A. Arima, K. Shimizu, W. Bentz, H. Hyuga, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 18, 1 (1987)Google Scholar
- 6.I.S. Towner, Phys. Rep. 155, 263 (1987)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 7.C. Gaarde et al., Nucl. Phys. A 369, 258 (1981)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 8.T. Wakasa et al., Phys. Rev. C 55, 2909 (1997)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 9.K. Yako et al., Phys. Lett. B 615, 193 (2005)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 10.K. Yako et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 012503 (2009)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 11.M. Sasano et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 202501 (2011)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 12.M. Sasano et al., Phys. Rev. C 86, 034324 (2012)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 13.T. Wakasa et al., Phys. Rev. C 85, 064606 (2012)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 14.F.T. Avignone III, S.R. Elliott, J. Engel, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 481 (2008)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 15.S. Fantoni et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 181101 (2001)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 16.G. Shen et al., Phys. Rev. C 87, 025802 (2013)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 17.T. Suzuki et al., Phys. Rev. C 74, 034307 (2006)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 18.C. Shen, U. Lombardo, N. Van Giai, W. Zuo, Phys. Rev. 68, 055802 (2003)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 19.J. Margueron, I. Vidaña, I. Bombaci, Phys. Rev. C 68, 055806 (2003)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 20.K. Langanke et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 202501 (2004)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 21.K. Langanke et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 011101 (2008)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 22.H. Toki et al., Phys. Rev. C 88, 015806 (2013)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 23.S. Jones et al., Astrophys. J. 772, 150 (2013)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 24.T. Suzuki, H. Toki, K. Nomoto, Astrophys. J. 817, 163 (2016)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 25.S. Reddy et al., Phys. Rev. C 59, 2888 (1999)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 26.A. Burrows, R.F. Sawyer, Phys. Rev. C 58, 554 (1998)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 27.A. Radhi et al., Phys. Rev. C 91, 045803 (2015)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 28.G. Bertsch, I. Hamamoto, Phys. Rev. C 26, 1323 (1982)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 29.A. Bohr, B.R. Mottelson, Phys. Lett. B 100, 10 (1981)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 30.M. Rho, Nucl. Phys. A 231, 493 (1974)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 31.E. Oset, M. Rho, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 47 (1979)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 32.A. Arima, in Proceedings of the International Symposium on New Facet of Spin Giant Resonances in Nuclei, 1997, edited by H. Sakai, H. Okamura, T. Wakasa (Univ. of Tokyo, Japan, 1997) p. 3Google Scholar
- 33.C.L. Bai, H.Q. Zhang, X.Z. Zhang, F.R. Xu, H. Sagawa, G. Colò, Phys. Rev. C 79, 0411301(R) (2009)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 34.W.G. Love, M.A. Franey, Phys. Rev. C 24, 1073 (1981)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 35.H. Matsubara et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 102501 (2015) and private communicationsADSGoogle Scholar
- 36.C.L. Bai, H. Sagawa, M. Sasano, T. Uesaka, K. Hagino, H.Q. Zhang, X.Z. Zhang, F.R. Xu, Phys. Lett. B 719, 116 (2013)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 37.Y. Fujita et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 112502 (2014)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 38.Y. Tanimura, H. Sagawa, K. Hagino, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2014, 053D02 (2014)Google Scholar
- 39.H. Sagawa, C.L. Bai, G. Colò, Phys. Scr. 91, 083011 (2016)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 40.S.J.Q. Robinson, L. Zamick, Phys. Rev. C 66, 034303 (2002)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 41.P. Van Isacker, J. Engel, K. Nomura, Phys. Rev. C 96, 064305 (2017)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 42.M. Takaki, T. Uesaka, proposal for experiment at RCNP, Search for double Gamow Teller giant resonances in ${}^{48}$Ti via the heavy-ion double charge exchange ${}^{48}Ca({}^{12}C,{}^{12}Be(0^{+}_{2}))$ reaction (2015)Google Scholar
- 43.F. Cappuzzello, C. Agodi, M. Bondi, D. Carbone, M. Cavallaro, A. Foti, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 630, 012018 (2015)Google Scholar
- 44.S. Mordechai, C.F. Moore, Nature 352, 393 (1991)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 45.H. Ward et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3209 (1993)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 46.Ph. Chomaz, N. Frascaria, Phys. Rep. 252, 275 (1995)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 47.J. Blomgren et al., Phys. Lett. B 362, 34 (1995)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 48.T. Uesaka, M. Takaki, proposal for nuclear physics experiment at RI Beam Factory, Search for Double Gamow-Teller Giant Resonances in $\beta\beta$-decay nuclei via the heavy-ion double charge exchange ${}^{48}Ca({}^{12}C,{}^{12}Be(0^{+}_{2}))$ reaction (2016)Google Scholar
- 49.N. Shimizu, J. Menéndez, K. Yako, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 142502 (2018)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 50.P. Vogel, M. Ericson, J.D. Vergados, Phys. Lett. B 212, 259 (1988)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 51.D.C. Zheng, L. Zamick, N. Auerbach, Phys. Rev. C 40, 936 (1989)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 52.K. Muto, Phys. Lett. B 277, 13 (1992)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 53.H. Sagawa, T. Uesaka, Phys. Rev. C 94, 064325 (2016)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 54.G. Colò, N. Van Giai, P.F. Bortignon, R.A. Broglia, Phys. Rev. C 50, 1496 (1994)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 55.G. Colò, H. Sagawa, N. Van Giai, P.F. Bortignon, T. Suzuki, Phys. Rev. C 57, 3049 (1998)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 56.Y.F. Niu, G. Colo, M. Brenna, P.F. Bortignon, J. Meng, Phys. Rev. C 85, 034313 (2012)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 57.M. Oertel, M. Hempel, T. Klähn, S. Typel, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 015007 (2017)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 58.J.M. Lattimer, Y. Lin, Astrophys. J. 771, 51 (2013)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 59.B.A. Li, X. Han, Phys. Lett. B 727, 276 (2013)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 60.C.J. Horowitz et al., J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 41, 093001 (2014)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 61.B.A. Brown, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5296 (2000)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 62.X. Roca-Maza, G. Colò, H. Sagawa, Phys. Rev. C 86, 031306 (2012)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 63.X. Roca-Maza, G. Colò, H. Sagawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 202501 (2018)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 64.N. Auerbach et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 484 (1969)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 65.X. Roca-Maza, G. Colò, H. Sagawa, EPJ Web of Conferences 194, 01002 (2018)Google Scholar
- 66.T. Suzuki, H. Sagawa, N. Van Giai, Phys. Rev. C 47, R1360 (1993)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 67.H. Sagawa, N.V. Giai, T. Suzuki, Phys. Lett. B 353, 7 (1995)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 68.P. Baczyk, J. Dobaczewski, M. Konieczka, W. Satula, T. Nakatsukasa, K. Sato, Phys. Lett. B 778, 178 (2018)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 69.H. Müther, A. Polls, R. Machleidt, Phys. Lett. B 445, 259 (1999)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 70.J. Yasuda, M. Sasano, R.G.T. Zegers et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 132501 (2018)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 71.Y.F. Niu, G. Colo, E. Vigezzi, Phys. Rev. C 90, 054328 (2014)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 72.Y.F. Niu, G. Colo, E. Vigezzi, C.L. Bai, H. Sagawa, Phys. Rev. C 94, 064328 (2016)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 73.M. Sasano, H. Sakai, Y. Yako et al., Phys. Rev. C 79, 024608 (2009)ADSGoogle Scholar