Advertisement

Sub-barrier fusion of 11Li with 208Pb

  • Walter Loveland
  • A. M. Vinodkumar
  • Ricardo Yanez
  • Larry Yao
  • Jonathan King
  • Jens Lassen
  • Alex Rojas
Regular Article - Experimental Physics
  • 34 Downloads

Abstract.

We have extended our previous measurements of the complete fusion and breakup fusion processes in the interaction of 11Li with spherical 208Pb with four new measurements at laboratory frame energies of 11Li of 26.1 to 32.7 MeV in the sub-barrier region. (Previous measurements were for \(E_{lab} = 28.6\) to 39.9 MeV.) Comparison of the complete fusion cross sections with coupled channel, TDHF and other models for these collisions reveals significant differences between the measured and calculated values. The implications of this finding for the fusion/breakup of halo nuclei are discussed.

References

  1. 1.
    B.B. Back, H. Esbensen, C.J. Jiang, K.E. Rehm, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 317 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A.M. Vinodkumar et al., Phys. Rev. C 87, 044603 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M.S. Hussein, M.P. Pato, L.F. Canto, R. Donangelo, Phys. Rev. C 46, 377 (1992)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M.S. Hussein, M.P. Pato, L.F. Canto, R. Donangelo, Phys. Rev. C 47, 2398 (1993)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Bass, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 265 (1977)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Bass, Reactions with Heavy Ions (Springer, Berlin, 1980)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Fisichella et al., Phys. Rev. C 92, 064611 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    https://doi.org/www.srim.org, SRIM version SRIM-2013
  9. 9.
    C. Signorini, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 23, 1235 (1997)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. Signorini, Nucl. Phys. A 616, 262C (1997)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Dasgupta et al., Phys. Rev. C 70, 024606 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    W. Reisdorf, Z. Phys. A 300, 227 (1981)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    W. Reisdorf, M. Schädel, Z. Phys. A 343, 47 (1992)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    A.M. Vinodkumar et al., Phys. Rev. C 80, 054609 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    B. Shyam, P. Banerjee, G. Baur, Nucl. Phys. A 540, 341 (1992)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J.P. Fernandez-Garcia et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 142701 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    J.P. Fernandez-Garcia et al., Phys. Rev. C 92, 044608 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    A.S. Umar, private communicationGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    P.R.S. Gomes, J. Lubian, I. Padron, R.M. Anjor, Phys. Rev. C 71, 017601 (2005)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    L.F. Canto, P.R.S. Gomes, J. Lubian, L.C. Chamon, E. Crema, J. Phys. G.: Nucl. Part. Phys. 36, 015109 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SIF, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Walter Loveland
    • 1
  • A. M. Vinodkumar
    • 2
  • Ricardo Yanez
    • 1
  • Larry Yao
    • 1
  • Jonathan King
    • 1
  • Jens Lassen
    • 3
  • Alex Rojas
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsUniversity of CalicutMalappuramIndia
  3. 3.TRIUMFVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations