Advertisement

Improved chiral nucleon-nucleon potential up to next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order

  • E. EpelbaumEmail author
  • H. Krebs
  • U. -G. Meißner
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics

Abstract.

We present improved nucleon-nucleon potentials derived in chiral effective field theory up to next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order. We argue that the nonlocal momentum-space regulator employed in the two-nucleon potentials of previous works (Nucl. Phys. A 747, 362 (2005) and Phys. Rev. C 68, 041001 (2003)) is not the most efficient choice, in particular since it affects the long-range part of the interaction. We are able to significantly reduce finite-cutoff artefacts by using an appropriate regularization in coordinate space which maintains the analytic structure of the amplitude. The new potentials do not require the additional spectral function regularization employed in (Nucl. Phys. A 747, 362 (2005)) to cut off the short-range components of the two-pion exchange and make use of the low-energy constants ci and di determined from pion-nucleon scattering without any fine tuning. We discuss in detail the construction of the new potentials and convergence of the chiral expansion for two-nucleon observables. We also employ a simple approach for estimating the theoretical uncertainty in few-nucleon calculations from the truncation of the chiral expansion that replaces previous reliance on cutoff variation.

Keywords

Partial Wave Theoretical Uncertainty Chiral Expansion Vector Analyze Power Deuteron Binding Energy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    S.R. Beane, W. Detmold, K. Orginos, M.J. Savage, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 66, 1 (2011) arXiv:1004.2935 [hep-lat]ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Weinberg, Phys. Lett. B 251, 288 (1990)ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    U. van Kolck, Phys. Rev. C 49, 2932 (1994)ADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. Ordonez, L. Ray, U. van Kolck, Phys. Rev. C 53, 2086 (1996) hep-ph/9511380ADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. Epelbaum, H.W. Hammer, U.-G. Meißner, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1773 (2009) arXiv:0811.1338 [nucl-th]ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    N. Kalantar-Nayestanaki, E. Epelbaum, J.G. Messchendorp, A. Nogga, Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 016301 (2012) arXiv:1108.1227 [nucl-th]ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    H.W. Hammer, A. Nogga, A. Schwenk, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 197 (2013) arXiv:1210.4273 [nucl-th]ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.W. Holt, N. Kaiser, W. Weise, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 73, 35 (2013) arXiv:1304.6350 [nucl-th]ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J.P. Vary, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 251, 155 (2014)ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. Krebs, A. Gasparyan, E. Epelbaum, Phys. Rev. C 87, 054007 (2013) arXiv:1302.2872 [nucl-th]ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    D.R. Phillips, C. Schat, Phys. Rev. C 88, 034002 (2013) arXiv:1307.6274 [nucl-th]ADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    E. Epelbaum, A.M. Gasparyan, H. Krebs, C. Schat, arXiv:1411.3612 [nucl-th]
  13. 13.
    R. Machleidt, D.R. Entem, J. Phys. G 37, 064041 (2010) arXiv:1001.0966 [nucl-th]ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    E. Epelbaum, in Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Quark Confinement and the Hadron Spectrum (Confinement X) Munich, Germany, October 8--12, 2012, edited by Matthias Berwein, Nora Brambilla, Stephan Paul (2012) 014, arXiv:1302.3241 [nucl-th]
  15. 15.
    Low-Energy Nuclear Physics International Collaboration, http://www.lenpic.org
  16. 16.
    E. Epelbaum, W. Glöckle, U.-G. Meißner, Nucl. Phys. A 747, 362 (2005) nucl-th/0405048ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    D.R. Entem, R. Machleidt, Phys. Rev. C 68, 041001 (2003) nucl-th/0304018ADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    E. Epelbaum, W. Glöckle, U.-G. Meißner, Eur. Phys. J. A 19, 125 (2004) nucl-th/0304037ADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    E. Epelbaum, W. Glöckle, U.-G. Meißner, Eur. Phys. J. A 19, 401 (2004) nucl-th/0308010ADSGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    R. Machleidt, D.R. Entem, Phys. Rep. 503, 1 (2011) arXiv:1105.2919 [nucl-th]ADSGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    V. Bernard, N. Kaiser, U.-G. Meißner, Nucl. Phys. A 615, 483 (1997) hep-ph/9611253ADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. Manohar, H. Georgi, Nucl. Phys. B 234, 189 (1984)ADSGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    G.P. Lepage, nucl-th/9706029Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    S.R. Beane, P.F. Bedaque, M.J. Savage, U. van Kolck, Nucl. Phys. A 700, 377 (2002) nucl-th/0104030ADSzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    A. Nogga, R.G.E. Timmermans, U. van Kolck, Phys. Rev. C 72, 054006 (2005) nucl-th/0506005ADSGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    B. Long, C.J. Yang, Phys. Rev. C 85, 034002 (2012) arXiv:1111.3993 [nucl-th]ADSGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    M.C. Birse, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London A 369, 2662 (2011) arXiv:1012.4914 [nucl-th]ADSzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    M. Pavon Valderrama, Phys. Rev. C 84, 064002 (2011) arXiv:1108.0872 [nucl-th]ADSGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    E. Epelbaum, U.-G. Meißner, Few-Body Syst. 54, 2175 (2013) nucl-th/0609037ADSGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    E. Epelbaum, J. Gegelia, Eur. Phys. J. A 41, 341 (2009) arXiv:0906.3822 [nucl-th]ADSGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    E. Epelbaum, J. Gegelia, Phys. Lett. B 716, 338 (2012) arXiv:1207.2420 [nucl-th]ADSGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    E. Epelbaum, A.M. Gasparyan, J. Gegelia, H. Krebs, arXiv:1501.01191 [nucl-th]
  33. 33.
    N. Kaiser, R. Brockmann, W. Weise, Nucl. Phys. A 625, 758 (1997) nucl-th/9706045ADSGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    E. Epelbaum, W. Glöckle, U.-G. Meißner, Nucl. Phys. A 637, 107 (1998) nucl-th/9801064ADSGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    E. Epelbaum, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 57, 654 (2006) nucl-th/0509032ADSGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    E. Epelbaum, Eur. Phys. J. A 34, 197 (2007) arXiv:0710.4250 [nucl-th]ADSGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    E. Epelbaum, arXiv:1001.3229 [nucl-th]
  38. 38.
    U. van Kolck, M.C.M. Rentmeester, J.L. Friar, J.T. Goldman, J.J. de Swart, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4386 (1998) nucl-th/9710067ADSGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    J.L. Friar, U. van Kolck, Phys. Rev. C 60, 034006 (1999) nucl-th/9906048ADSGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    M. Walzl, U.-G. Meißner, E. Epelbaum, Nucl. Phys. A 693, 663 (2001) nucl-th/0010019ADSzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    J.L. Friar, U. van Kolck, G.L. Payne, S.A. Coon, Phys. Rev. C 68, 024003 (2003) nucl-th/0303058ADSGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    E. Epelbaum, U.-G. Meißner, Phys. Rev. C 72, 044001 (2005) nucl-th/0502052ADSGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    N. Kaiser, Phys. Rev. C 73, 064003 (2006) nucl-th/0605040ADSGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    J.J. de Swart, M.C.M. Rentmeester, R.G.E. Timmermans, PiN Newslett. 13, 96 (1997) nucl-th/9802084Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    V.G.J. Stoks, R.A.M. Klomp, M.C.M. Rentmeester, J.J. de Swart, Phys. Rev. C 48, 792 (1993) Nijmegen NN on-line program, http://nn-online.org/ ADSGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    N. Kaiser, Phys. Rev. C 64, 057001 (2001) nucl-th/0107064ADSGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    N. Fettes, U.-G. Meißner, S. Steininger, Nucl. Phys. A 640, 199 (1998) hep-ph/9803266ADSGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    S. Weinberg, Nucl. Phys. B 363, 3 (1991)ADSGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    J.L. Friar, Phys. Rev. C 60, 034002 (1999) nucl-th/9901082ADSGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    V. Bernard, E. Epelbaum, H. Krebs, U.-G. Meißner, Phys. Rev. C 84, 054001 (2011) arXiv:1108.3816 [nucl-th]ADSGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    E. Epelbaum, J. Gegelia, PoS CD 12, 090 (2013) arXiv:1301.6134 [nucl-th]Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    E. Epelbaum, A.M. Gasparyan, J. Gegelia, M.R. Schindler, Eur. Phys. J. A 50, 51 (2014) arXiv:1311.7164 [nucl-th]ADSGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    E. Marji, A. Canul, Q. MacPherson, R. Winzer, C. Zeoli, D.R. Entem, R. Machleidt, Phys. Rev. C 88, 054002 (2013) arXiv:1309.5114 [nucl-th]ADSGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    B. Borasoy, E. Epelbaum, H. Krebs, D. Lee, U.-G. Meißner, Eur. Phys. J. A 31, 105 (2007) nucl-th/0611087ADSGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    E. Epelbaum, H. Krebs, D. Lee, U.-G. Meißner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 142501 (2010) arXiv:0912.4195 [nucl-th]ADSGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    E. Epelbaum, H. Krebs, D. Lee, U.-G. Meißner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 192501 (2011) arXiv:1101.2547 [nucl-th]ADSGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    E. Epelbaum, H. Krebs, T.A. Lähde, D. Lee, U.-G. Meißner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 252501 (2012) arXiv:1208.1328 [nucl-th]ADSGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    T.A. Lähde, E. Epelbaum, H. Krebs, D. Lee, U.-G. Meißner, G. Rupak, Phys. Lett. B 732, 110 (2014) arXiv:1311.0477 [nucl-th]ADSGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    E. Epelbaum, H. Krebs, T.A. Lähde, D. Lee, U.-G. Meißner, G. Rupak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 102501 (2014) arXiv:1312.7703 [nucl-th]ADSGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    B.N. Lu, T.A. Lähde, D. Lee, U.-G. Meißner, Phys. Rev. D 90, 034507 (2014) arXiv:1403.8056 [nucl-th]ADSGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    A. Gezerlis, I. Tews, E. Epelbaum, S. Gandolfi, K. Hebeler, A. Nogga, A. Schwenk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 032501 (2013) arXiv:1303.6243 [nucl-th]ADSGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    A. Gezerlis, I. Tews, E. Epelbaum, M. Freunek, S. Gandolfi, K. Hebeler, A. Nogga, A. Schwenk, arXiv:1406.0454 [nucl-th]
  63. 63.
    T.D. Cohen, J.M. Hansen, Phys. Rev. C 59, 13 (1999) nucl-th/9808038ADSGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    A.M. Gasparyan, M.F.M. Lutz, E. Epelbaum, Eur. Phys. J. A 49, 115 (2013) arXiv:1212.3057 [nucl-th]ADSGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    J.A. Oller, arXiv:1402.2449 [nucl-th]
  66. 66.
    V. Baru, E. Epelbaum, C. Hanhart, M. Hoferichter, A.E. Kudryavtsev, D.R. Phillips, Eur. Phys. J. A 48, 69 (2012) arXiv:1202.0208 [nucl-th]ADSGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    S. Ishikawa, M.R. Robilotta, Phys. Rev. C 76, 014006 (2007) arXiv:0704.0711 [nucl-th]ADSGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    V. Bernard, E. Epelbaum, H. Krebs, U.-G. Meißner, Phys. Rev. C 77, 064004 (2008) arXiv:0712.1967 [nucl-th]ADSGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    H. Krebs, A. Gasparyan, E. Epelbaum, Phys. Rev. C 85, 054006 (2012) arXiv:1203.0067 [nucl-th]ADSGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    V. Baru, C. Hanhart, M. Hoferichter, B. Kubis, A. Nogga, D.R. Phillips, Phys. Lett. B 694, 473 (2011) arXiv:1003.4444 [nucl-th]ADSGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    R.A. Arndt, R.L. Workman, M.M. Pavan, Phys. Rev. C 49, 2729 (1994)ADSGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    P. Büttiker, U.-G. Meißner, Nucl. Phys. A 668, 97 (2000) hep-ph/9908247Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    N. Fettes, U.-G. Meißner, Nucl. Phys. A 676, 311 (2000) hep-ph/0002162ADSGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    J.M. Alarcon, J. Martin Camalich, J.A. Oller, Ann. Phys. 336, 413 (2013) arXiv:1210.4450 [hep-ph]ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Y.H. Chen, D.L. Yao, H.Q. Zheng, Phys. Rev. D 87, 054019 (2013) arXiv:1212.1893 [hep-ph]ADSGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    K.A. Wendt, B.D. Carlsson, A. Ekström, arXiv:1410.0646 [nucl-th]
  77. 77.
    M.C.M. Rentmeester, R.G.E. Timmermans, J.L. Friar, J.J. de Swart, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4992 (1999) nucl-th/9901054ADSGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    D.R. Entem, R. Machleidt, Phys. Rev. C 66, 014002 (2002) nucl-th/0202039ADSGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    M.C.M. Rentmeester, R.G.E. Timmermans, J.J. de Swart, Phys. Rev. C 67, 044001 (2003) nucl-th/0302080ADSGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    D.R. Entem, R. Machleidt, nucl-th/0303017Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    A. Ekström, B.D. Carlsson, K.A. Wendt, C. Forssén, M. Hjorth-Jensen, R. Machleidt, S.M. Wild, J. Phys. G 42, 034003 (2015) arXiv:1406.6895 [nucl-th]ADSGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    R.N. Perez, J.E. Amaro, E.R. Arriola, arXiv:1411.1212 [nucl-th]
  83. 83.
    A. Ekstrom, G. Baardsen, C. Forssen, G. Hagen, M. Hjorth-Jensen, G.R. Jansen, R. Machleidt, W. Nazarewicz et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 192502 (2013) arXiv:1303.4674 [nucl-th]ADSGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    J.R. Bergervoet, P.C. van Campen, W.A. van der Sanden, J.J. de Swart, Phys. Rev. C 38, 15 (1988)ADSGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    R.B. Wiringa, V.G.J. Stoks, R. Schiavilla, Phys. Rev. C 51, 38 (1995) nucl-th/9408016ADSGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    R. Machleidt, Phys. Rev. C 63, 024001 (2001) nucl-th/0006014ADSGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    T. Mehen, I.W. Stewart, M.B. Wise, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 931 (1999) hep-ph/9902370ADSGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    E. Epelbaum, U.-G. Meißner, W. Glöckle, C. Elster, Phys. Rev. C 65, 044001 (2002) nucl-th/0106007ADSGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    J.L. Friar, Phys. Rev. C 20, 325 (1979)ADSGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    V.G.J. Stoks, R.A.M. Klomp, C.P.F. Terheggen, J.J. de Swart, Phys. Rev. C 49, 2950 (1994) nucl-th/9406039ADSGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    J.L. Forest, Phys. Rev. C 61, 034007 (2000) nucl-th/9905063ADSGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    R. Machleidt, P. Liu, D.R. Entem, E. Ruiz Arriola, Phys. Rev. C 81, 024001 (2010) arXiv:0910.3942 [nucl-th]ADSGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    M.R. Schindler, D.R. Phillips, Ann. Phys. 324, 682 (2009) 324ADSzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    R.A. Arndt, I.I. Strakovsky, R.L. Workman, Phys. Rev. C 50, 2731 (1994)ADSGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    D.R. Entem, N. Kaiser, R. Machleidt, Y. Nosyk, arXiv:1411.5335 [nucl-th]
  96. 96.
    M.C. Birse, J.A. McGovern, Phys. Rev. C 70, 054002 (2004) nucl-th/0307050ADSGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    H.W. Grießhammer, Nucl. Phys. A 744, 192 (2004) nucl-th/0404073ADSGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    H.W. Grießhammer, talk given at the Workshop on Bound states and resonances in effective field theories and lattice QCD calculations, Benasque, Spain, July 20 - August 1, 2014Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    R.J. Furnstahl, D.R. Phillips, S. Wesolowski, J. Phys. G 42, 034028 (2015) arXiv:1407.0657 [nucl-th]ADSGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    C. van der Leun, C. Alderlisten, Nucl. Phys. A 380, 261 (1982)ADSGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    T.E.O. Ericson, M. Rosa-Clot, Nucl. Phys. A 405, 497 (1983)ADSGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    N.L. Rodning, L.D. Knutson, Phys. Rev. C 41, 898 (1990)ADSGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    A. Huber, T. Udem, B. Gross, J. Reichert, M. Kourogi, K. Pachucki, M. Weitz, T.W. Hansch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 468 (1998)ADSGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    J. Martorell, D.W.L. Sprung, D.C. Zheng, Phys. Rev. C 51, 1127 (1995)ADSGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    D.M. Bishop, L.M. Cheung, Phys. Rev. A 20, 381 (1979)ADSGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    M. Kohno, J. Phys. G 9, L85 (1983)ADSGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    D.R. Phillips, J. Phys. G 34, 365 (2007) nucl-th/0608036ADSGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    M. Piarulli, L. Girlanda, L.E. Marcucci, S. Pastore, R. Schiavilla, M. Viviani, Phys. Rev. C 87, 014006 (2013) arXiv:1212.1105 [nucl-th]ADSGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    H. Witala, J. Golak, R. Skibinski, K. Topolnicki, J. Phys. G 41, 094011 (2014) arXiv:1310.0198 [nucl-th]ADSGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    N. Fettes, V. Bernard, U.-G. Meißner, Nucl. Phys. A 669, 269 (2000) hep-ph/9907276ADSGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    D. Siemens, V. Bernard, E. Epelbaum, H. Krebs, U.-G. Meißner, Phys. Rev. C 89, 065211 (2014) arXiv:1403.2510 [nucl-th]ADSGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    R. Navarro Perez, J.E. Amaro, E. Ruiz Arriola, Phys. Rev. C 88, 064002 (2013) arXiv:1310.2536 [nucl-th]ADSGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    W.P. Abfalterer, F.B. Bateman, F.S. Dietrich, R.W. Finlay, R.C. Haight, G.L. Morgan, Phys. Rev. C 63, 044608 (2001)ADSGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    G. Fink et al., Nucl. Phys. A 518, 561 (1990)ADSGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    T.C. Montgomery et al., Phys. Rev. C 16, 499 (1977)ADSGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    D.H. Fitzgerald et al., Phys. Rev. C 21, 1190 (1980)ADSGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    R. Garrett et al., Phys. Rev. C 21, 1149 (1980)ADSGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    A. Langsford et al., Nucl. Phys. 74, 241 (1965)Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    J.L. Romero et al., Phys. Rev. C 17, 468 (1978)ADSGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    J. Wilczynski et al., Nucl. Phys. A 425, 458 (1984)ADSGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    T.C. Griffith et al., Proc. Phys. Soc. London Sect. A 71, 305 (1958)ADSGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    J. Rahm et al., Phys. Rev. C 63, 044001 (2001)ADSGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    T. Rönnqvist et al., Phys. Rev. C 45, R496 (1992)ADSGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    G.H. Stafford et al., Lett. Nuovo Cimento 5, 1589 (1957)Google Scholar
  125. 125.
    A.J. Bersbach et al., Phys. Rev. D 13, 535 (1976)ADSGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    A.F. Kuckes et al., Phys. Rev. 121, 1226 (1961)ADSGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    A.R. Thomas, D. Spalding, E.H. Thorndike, Phys. Rev. 167, 1240 (1968)ADSGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Yu.M. Kazarinov et al., SPJETP 16, 24 (1963)ADSGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    H.P. Stapp, T.J. Ypsilantis, N. Metropolis, Phys. Rev. 105, 302 (1957)ADSGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    J.M. Blatt, L.C. Biedenharn, Phys. Rev. 86, 399 (1952)ADSzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    J.M. Blatt, L.C. Biedenharn, Rev. Mod, Phys. 24, 258 (1952)ADSzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    C.M. Vincent, S.C. Phatak, Phys. Rev. C 10, 391 (1974)ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SIF, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für Theoretische Physik IIRuhr-Universität BochumBochumGermany
  2. 2.Helmholtz-Institut für Strahlen- und Kernphysik and Bethe Center for Theoretical PhysicsUniversität BonnBonnGermany
  3. 3.Institut für Kernphysik, Institute for Advanced Simulation, and Jülich Center for Hadron PhysicsForschungszentrum JülichJülichGermany
  4. 4.JARA - High Performance ComputingForschungszentrum JülichJülichGermany

Personalised recommendations