Advertisement

Sign ambiguity in the channel

  • A. V. Anisovich
  • E. Klempt
  • V. A. Nikonov
  • A. V. Sarantsev
  • U. Thoma
Regular Article - Experimental Physics

Abstract

Ambiguities of the signs of NΣK coupling constants are studied in a multichannel partial wave analysis of a large body of pion- and photo-induced reactions. It is shown that the signs are not free from some ambiguities, and further experimental data are needed. Data on the reactions π + pΣ + K + and γpK + Σ 0 define rather well the isospin 3/2 contributions to these channels. However the lack of information on polarization observables for the reactions π pΣ 0 K 0, π pΣ K + and γpK 0 Σ + does not allow us to fix uniquely the signs of NΣK coupling constants. As a consequence, also the contributions of nucleon resonances to these channels remain uncertain.

Keywords

Total Cross Section Partial Wave Baryon Resonance Polarization Observable Nucleon Resonance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    E. Klempt, J.M. Richard, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1095 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. Crede, W. Roberts, Rep. Prog. Phys. 76, 076301 (2013).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    T. Feuster, U. Mosel, Phys. Rev. C 58, 457 (1998).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    T. Feuster, U. Mosel, Phys. Rev. C 59, 460 (1999).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Penner, U. Mosel, Phys. Rev. C 66, 055211 (2002).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. Penner, U. Mosel, Phys. Rev. C 66, 055212 (2002).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    V. Shklyar, G. Penner, U. Mosel, Eur. Phys. J. A 21, 445 (2004).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. Shklyar, H. Lenske, U. Mosel, G. Penner, Phys. Rev. C 71, 055206 (2005) 72.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    V. Shklyar, H. Lenske, U. Mosel, Phys. Rev. C 72, 015210 (2005).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    V. Shklyar, H. Lenske, U. Mosel, Phys. Lett. B 650, 172 (2007).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    V. Shklyar, H. Lenske, U. Mosel, Phys. Rev. C 87, 015201 (2013).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    X. Cao, V. Shklyar, H. Lenske, Phys. Rev. C 88, 055204 (2013).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    R.A. Arndt, W.J. Briscoe, I.I. Strakovsky, R.L. Workman, Phys. Rev. C 74, 045205 (2006).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Doring et al., Nucl. Phys. A 851, 58 (2011).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. Ronchen et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 49, 44 (2013).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    F. Huang et al., Phys. Rev. C 85, 054003 (2012).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. Matsuyama, T. Sato, T.-S.H. Lee, Phys. Rep. 439, 193 (2007).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    B. Julia-Diaz, T.-S.H. Lee, A. Matsuyama, T. Sato, L.C. Smith, Phys. Rev. C 77, 045205 (2008).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    H. Kamano, B. Julia-Diaz, T.-S.H. Lee, A. Matsuyama, T. Sato, Phys. Rev. C 79, 025206 (2009).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    H. Kamano, B. Julia-Diaz, T.-S.H. Lee, A. Matsuyama, T. Sato, Phys. Rev. C 80, 065203 (2009).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    H. Kamano, S.X. Nakamura, T.-S.H. Lee, T. Sato, Phys. Rev. C 88, 035209 (2013).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    A.V. Anisovich et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 47, 27 (2011).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    A.V. Anisovich, E. Klempt, V.A. Nikonov, A.V. Sarantsev, U. Thoma, Eur. Phys. J. A 47, 153 (2011).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    A.V. Anisovich et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 48, 15 (2012).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    A.V. Anisovich et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 48, 88 (2012).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    J. Beringer et al., Phys. Rev. D 86, 010001 (2012).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    A.V. Anisovich et al., Phys. Lett. B 711, 167 (2012).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    M. Anselmino et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 1199 (1993).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    A.V. Anisovich et al., Phys. Lett. B 711, 162 (2012).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    L.Y. Glozman, Phys. Lett. B 475, 329 (2000).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    L.Y. Glozman, Phys. Rep. 444, 1 (2007).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    R.L. Jaffe, Phys. Rep. 409, 1 (2005).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    M. Shrestha, D.M. Manley, Phys. Rev. C 86, 055203 (2012).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    D.M. Manley et al., Phys. Rev. D 30, 904 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    T. Corthals, J. Ryckebusch, T. Van Cauteren, Phys. Rev. C 73, 045207 (2006).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    A. Usov, O. Scholten, Phys. Rev. C 72, 025205 (2005).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    R. Shyam, O. Scholten, Phys. Rev. C 78, 065201 (2008).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    R. Shyam, O. Scholten, H. Lenske, Phys. Rev. C 81, 015204 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    H. Schmieden, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 349, 012006 (2012) and in preparation.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    T.C. Jude, arXiv:1308.5659 [nucl-ex].
  41. 41.
    A2 Collaboration (P. Aguar-Bartolome et al.), Phys. Rev. C 88, 044601 (2013).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    R.D. Baker et al., Nucl. Phys. B 145, 402 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    T.O. Binford et al., Phys. Rev. 183, 1134 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    J.C. Hart et al., Nucl. Phys. B 166, 73 (1980).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    D.J. Candlin et al., Nucl. Phys. B 226, 1 (1983).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    M. Winik et al., Nucl. Phys. B 128, 66 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    N.L. Carayannopoulos, G.W. Tautfest, R.B. Willmann, Phys. Rev. 138, B433 (1965).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    F.S. Crawford, F. Grard, G.A. Smith, Phys. Rev. 128, 368 (1962).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    C. Baltay et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 33, 374 (1961).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    D.J. Candlin et al., Nucl. Phys. B 311, 613 (1989).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    M.L. Good, R.R. Kofler, Phys. Rev. 183, 1142 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    J.C. Doyle, F.S. Crawford, J.A. Anderson, Phys. Rev. 165, 1483 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    O.I. Dahl et al., Phys. Rev. 163, 1430 (1967) 183.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    O. Goussu et al., Nuovo Cimento A 42, 606 (1966).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    B. Dey et al., Phys. Rev. C 82, 025202 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    A. Lleres et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 31, 79 (2007).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    R. Bradford et al., Phys. Rev. C 75, 035205 (2007).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    R. Lawall et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 24, 275 (2005).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    R. Castelijns et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 35, 39 (2008).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    C.S. Nepali et al., Phys. Rev. C 87, 045206 (2013).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    E.H. Bellamy et al., Phys. Lett. B 39, 299 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SIF, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. V. Anisovich
    • 1
    • 2
  • E. Klempt
    • 1
  • V. A. Nikonov
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. V. Sarantsev
    • 1
    • 2
  • U. Thoma
    • 1
  1. 1.Helmholtz-Institut für Strahlen- und KernphysikUniversität BonnBonnGermany
  2. 2.Petersburg Nuclear Physics InstituteGatchinaRussia

Personalised recommendations