Advertisement

Vector analyzing powers of the deuteron-proton elastic scattering and breakup at 100 MeV

  • E. StephanEmail author
  • St. Kistryn
  • A. Biegun
  • K. Bodek
  • I. Ciepał
  • A. Deltuva
  • M. Eslami-Kalantari
  • A. C. Fonseca
  • I. Gasparić
  • J. Golak
  • L. Joulaeizadeh
  • N. Kalantar-Nayestanaki
  • H. Kamada
  • B. Kłos
  • A. Kozela
  • J. G. Messchendorp
  • H. Moeini
  • A. Nogga
  • W. Parol
  • A. Ramazani-Moghaddam-Arani
  • R. Skibiński
  • R. Sworst
  • A. Wilczek
  • H. Witała
  • J. Zejma
Open Access
Regular Article - Experimental Physics

Abstract.

High-quality vector analyzing power data for the 1 H(d,pp)n breakup reaction and elastic scattering at 100MeV beam energy have been measured in a large part of the phase space for these processes. The results are compared to theoretical predictions obtained using the charge-dependent Bonn potential alone or combined with the three-nucleon force TM99 as well as to the results of calculations in the coupled-channel approach, with or without the inclusion of the Coulomb interaction. In the studied observables, effects of the 3NF and the Coulomb force are almost absent. The pairwise NN interactions alone are sufficient to describe the experimental results.

Keywords

Elastic Scattering Polar Angle Deuteron Beam Breakup Reaction Tensor Analyze Power 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    R. Lazauskas et al., Phys. Rev. C 71, 034004 (2005)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Deltuva, A.C. Fonseca, Phys. Rev. C 67, 021001 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    V.G.J. Stoks, R.A.M. Klomp, M.C.M. Rentmeester, J.J. de Swart, Phys. Rev. C 48, 792 (1993)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. Epelbaum, H.-W. Hammer, U.-G. Meissner, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1773 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Fujita, H. Miyazawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 17, 360 (1957)MathSciNetADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S.A. Coon, H.K. Han, Few-Body Syst. 30, 131 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    H.T. Coelho et al., Phys. Rev. C 28, 1912 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    B.S. Pudliner, V.R. Pandharipande, J. Carlson, S.C. Pieper, R.B. Wiringa, Phys. Rev. C 56, 1720 (1997)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S.C. Pieper, V.R. Pandharipande, R.B. Wiringa, J. Carlson, Phys. Rev. C 64, 014001 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Nogga et al., Phys. Rev. C 67, 034004 (2003)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    W. Glöckle et al., Phys. Rep. 274, 107 (1996) and references thereinADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. Witala, W. Glöckle, D. Huber, J. Golak, H. Kamada, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1183 (1998)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. Sakai et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5288 (2000)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. Bieber et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 606 (2000)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    K. Hatanaka et al., Phys. Rev. C 66, 044002 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    P. Mermod et al., Phys. Lett. B 597, 243 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    K. Sekiguchi et al., Phys. Rev. C 70, 014001 (2004)MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    K. Sekiguchi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 162301 (2005)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    K. Ermisch et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5862 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    K. Ermisch et al., Phys. Rev. C 68, 051001 (2003)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    K. Ermisch et al., Phys. Rev. C 71, 064004 (2005)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    B. von Przewoski et al., Phys. Rev. C 74, 064003 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Y. Maeda et al., Phys. Rev. C 76, 014004 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    H.R. Amir-Ahmadi et al., Phys. Rev. C 75, 041001(R) (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    H. Mardanpour et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 31, 383 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    E. Stephan et al., Phys. Rev. C 76, 57001 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    A. Ramazani-Moghaddam-Arani et al., Phys. Rev. C 78, 014006 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    A. Deltuva, K. Chmielewski, P.U. Sauer, Phys. Rev. C 67, 034001 (2003)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    A. Deltuva, R. Machleidt, P.U. Sauer, Phys. Rev. C 68, 024005 (2003)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    A. Deltuva, A.C. Fonseca, P.U. Sauer, Phys. Rev. C 72, 054004 (2005)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    A. Deltuva, A.C. Fonseca, P.U. Sauer, Phys. Rev. C 73, 057001 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    E. Epelbaum, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 57, 654 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    St. Kistryn et al., Nucl. Phys. A 548, 49 (1992)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    J. Balewski et al., Nucl. Phys. A 581, 131 (1995)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    M. Allet et al., Phys. Rev. C 50, 602 (1994)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    M. Allet et al., Phys. Lett. B 376, 255 (1996)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    J. Zejma et al., Phys. Rev. C 55, 42 (1997)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    K. Bodek et al., Few-Body Syst. 30, 65 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    St. Kistryn et al., Phys. Rev. C 68, 054004 (2003)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    St. Kistryn et al., Phys. Rev. C 72, 044006 (2005)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    St. Kistryn et al., Phys. Lett. B 641, 23 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    E. Stephan et al., Phys. Rev. C 82, 014003 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    I. Ciepałet al., Phys. Rev. C 85, 017001 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    E. Stephan et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 42, 13 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    M. Eslami-Kalantari et al., Mod. Phys. Lett. A 24, 839 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    H. Mardanpour et al., Phys. Lett. B 687, 149 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    H.O. Meyer et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 112502 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    K. Sekiguchi et al., Phys. Rev. C 79, 054008 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    S. Kuroita et al., Few-Body Sys. 44, 53 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    S. Kuroita et al., Few-Body Sys. 50, 287 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    K. Sagara, Few-Body Sys. 48, 59 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    N. Kalantar-Nayestanaki, E. Epelbaum, J.G. Meschendorp, A. Nogga, Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 016301 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    H.R. Kremers, A.G. Drentje, AIP Conf. Proc. 421, 502 (1997)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    N. Kalantar-Nayestanaki, J. Mulder, J. Zijlstra, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 417, 215 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    N. Kalantar-Nayestanaki et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 444, 591 (2000)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    M. Volkerts, A. Bakker, N. Kalantar-Nayestanaki, H. Fraiquin, A. Eads, T. Rinckel, K. Solberg, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 428, 432 (1999)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    St. Kistryn, Readout System for Medium-Size Experiments, in Advanced Technologies (Sciyo, Rijeka, 2010) ISBN 978-953-7619Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    H.G. Essel, N. Kurz, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 47, 337 (2000)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    J.B. Birks, Proc. Phys. Soc. A 64, 874 (1951)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    C.N. Chou, Phys. Rev. 87, 904 (1952)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    G.G. Ohlsen, Rep. Prog. Phys. 35, 717 (1972)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    H. Witała et al., Few-Body Sys. 15, 67 (1993)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    R. Sworst, PhD thesis, Jagiellonian University, 2009Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    G.G. Ohlsen, R.E. Brown, F.D. Correll, R.A. Hardekopf, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 179, 283 (1981)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2013

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Stephan
    • 1
    Email author
  • St. Kistryn
    • 2
  • A. Biegun
    • 3
  • K. Bodek
    • 2
  • I. Ciepał
    • 2
  • A. Deltuva
    • 4
  • M. Eslami-Kalantari
    • 3
    • 5
  • A. C. Fonseca
    • 4
  • I. Gasparić
    • 3
  • J. Golak
    • 2
  • L. Joulaeizadeh
    • 3
  • N. Kalantar-Nayestanaki
    • 3
  • H. Kamada
    • 6
  • B. Kłos
    • 1
  • A. Kozela
    • 7
  • J. G. Messchendorp
    • 3
  • H. Moeini
    • 3
  • A. Nogga
    • 8
  • W. Parol
    • 2
  • A. Ramazani-Moghaddam-Arani
    • 3
    • 9
  • R. Skibiński
    • 2
  • R. Sworst
    • 2
  • A. Wilczek
    • 1
  • H. Witała
    • 2
  • J. Zejma
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of PhysicsUniversity of SilesiaKatowicePoland
  2. 2.Institute of PhysicsJagiellonian UniversityKrakówPoland
  3. 3.Kernfysisch Versneller InstituutGroningenThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Centro de Fisica Nuclear da Universidade de LisboaLisboaPortugal
  5. 5.Faculty of PhysicsYazd UniversityYazdIran
  6. 6.Department of PhysicsKyushu Institute of TechnologyKyushuJapan
  7. 7.Institute of Nuclear Physics, PANKrakówPoland
  8. 8.Forschungszentrum Jülich, IKP-3 (Theorie), IAS-4 and JCHPJülichGermany
  9. 9.Faculty of PhysicsUniversity of KashanKashanIran

Personalised recommendations