The pK0Σ+ final state in proton-proton collisions
- 379 Downloads
- 9 Citations
Abstract
This paper reports results from a study of the reaction pp → pK0Σ+ at beam momenta of p beam = 2950, 3059, and 3200 MeV/c (excess energies of ε = 126, 161, and 206 MeV. Total cross-sections were determined for all energies; a set of differential cross-sections (Dalitz plots; invariant-mass spectra of all two-body subsystems; angular distributions of all final-state particles; distributions in helicity and Jackson frames) are presented for ε = 161 MeV. The total cross-sections are proportional to the volume of available three-body phase space indicating that the transition matrix element does not change significantly in this range of excess energies. It is concluded from the differential data that the reaction proceeds dominantly via the N(1710)P 11- and/or N(1720)P 13-resonance(s); N(1650)S 11 and Δ(1600)P 33 could also contribute.
Keywords
Angular Distribution Excess Energy Dalitz Plot Transition Matrix Element Intermediate ResonanceReferences
- 1.D. Grzonka, K. Kilian, Nucl. Phys. A 626, 41 (1997).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.J.T. Balewski et al., Nucl. Phys. A 626, 85 (1997).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.J.T. Balewski et al., Phys. Lett. B 420, 211 (1998).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.S. Severin et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 682 (1999).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.P. Kowina et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 22, 293 (2004).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.M. Abd El-Samad et al., Phys. Lett. B 632, 27 (2006).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.T. Rozek et al., Phys. Lett. B 643, 251 (2006).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Yu. Valdau et al., Phys. Lett.B 652, 245 (2007).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.M. Abd El-Samad et al., Phys. Lett. B 688, 142 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.S. Abdel-Samad et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 46, 27 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Yu. Valdau et al., Phys. Rev. C 81, 045208 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.A. Budzanowski et al., Phys. Lett. B 692, 10 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.A. Sibirtsev et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 27, 269 (2006).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.A. Sibirtsev et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 29, 363 (2006).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.B.C. Lui, B.S. Zou, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 042002 (2006).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.A. Gasparin et al., Phys. Lett. B 480, 273 (2000).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.M. Dillig, M. Schott, arXiv:nucl-th/0604059v1.
- 18.J.M. Laget, Phys. Lett. B 259, 24 (1991).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.J.M. Laget, Nucl. Phys. A 691, 11 (2001).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Yu. Valdau, C. Wilkin, Phys. Lett. B 696, 23 (2011).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.M. Abdel-Bary et al., Phys. Lett. B 649, 252 (2007).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.R.I. Louttit et al., Phys. Rev. 123, 1465 (1961).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.E. Bierman et al., Phys. Rev. 147, 922 (1966).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.G. Alexander et al., Phys. Rev. 154, 1284 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.S.O. Holmgren et al., Nuovo Cimento A 51, 305 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.I. Sondhi et al., Phys. Lett. B 26, 645 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.W. Chinowsky et al., Phys. Rev. 165, 1466 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.M.W. Firebaugh et al., Phys. Rev. 172, 1354 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.W.M. Dunwoodie, PhD thesis, UCLA 1033 (1968).Google Scholar
- 30.A. Baldini, Landolt-Börnstein: Numerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology, New Series, Vol. I/12b (Springer, New York, Heidelberg, 1988).Google Scholar
- 31.E. Ferrari, Phys. Rev. 120, 988 (1960).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Tsu Yao, Phys. Rev. 125, 1048 (1962).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.E. Ferrari, S. Serio, Phys. Rev. 167, 1298 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.C.B. Dover, Brookhaven National Laboratory BNL--84595, DE93 010879 (1993).Google Scholar
- 35.A. Sibirtsev et al., Nucl. Phys. A 646, 427 (1999).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.K. Tsushima et al., Phys. Rev. C 59, 369 (1999).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.M. Abdel-Bary et al., Phys. Lett. B 647, 351 (2007).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.M. Abdel-Bary et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 44, 7 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.M. Schulte-Wissermann, PhD Thesis, TU Dresden (2004).Google Scholar
- 40.M. Dahmen, PhD Thesis, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelm-Universität Bonn, Jül-3140, ISSN 0944-2952 (1995).Google Scholar
- 41.R. Bilger et al., Phys. Lett. B 420, 217 (1998).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 42.A. Hassan et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 425, 403 (1999).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 43.M. Dahmen et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 348, 97 (1994).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 44.A. Böhm et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 443, 238 (2000).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 45.M. Abdel-Bary et al., Phys. Lett. B 662, 14 (2008).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 46.R. Bilger et al., Phys. Lett. B 429, 195 (1998).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 47.M. Abdel-Bary et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 16, 127 (2003).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 48.L. Karsch, PhD Thesis, TU Dresden (2005).Google Scholar
- 49.Particle Data Group (W.-M. Yao et al.), J. Phys. G 33, 1 (2006).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 50.S. Brand, PhD Thesis, Ruhr-Universität Bochum (1995).Google Scholar
- 51.U. Zielinsky, PhD Thesis, Ruhr-Universität Bochum (1999).Google Scholar
- 52.D. Albers et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1652 (1997).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 53.E. Byckling, K. Kajantie, Particle Kinematics (John Wiley & Sons, 1973).Google Scholar
- 54.E.L. Berger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 1139 (1969).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 55.R.H. Dalitz, Philos. Mag. Series 7 44, 1068 (1953).Google Scholar
- 56.K. Gottfried, J.D. Jackson, Nuovo Cimento 33, 309 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 57.J.M. Blatt, L.C. Biedenharn, Rev. Mod. Phys. 24, 258 (1952).ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 58.A.V.Sarantsev et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 25, 441 (2005).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar