Advertisement

Neutron particle-hole structure of states in 208Pb determined from the proton decay of the d5/2 isobaric analog resonance in 209Bi

  • A. HeuslerEmail author
  • T. Faestermann
  • G. Graw
  • R. Hertenberger
  • J. Jolie
  • R. Krücken
  • D. Mücher
  • N. Pietralla
  • C. Scholl
  • V. Werner
  • H. -F. Wirth
  • P. von Brentano
Regular Article - Experimental Physics

Abstract.

Proton scattering on 208Pb via isobaric analog resonances (IARs) in 209Bi generates neutron particle-hole configurations in excited states of 208Pb . The spin and parity of the neutron particle correspond to the spin and parity of the resonance. We performed experiments on the 208Pb (p, p’) reaction via all known isobaric analog resonances in 209Bi with the Q3D magnetic spectrograph in München. We observed more than 130 levels in the range of excitation energies E x < 6.4 MeV. In the proton decay of the d 5/2 resonance, 29 levels have cross-sections larger than 5% of the maximum cross-section of any level. Six levels in the range 4.6 < E x < 5.2 MeV correspond to states with known spins and major \(\ensuremath \nu(d_{5/2}^{+1} p_{1/2}^{-1})\) strength. Six levels in the range 5.7 < E x < 6.4 MeV contain most of the \(\ensuremath \nu(d_{5/2}^{+1} p_{3/2}^{-1})\) strength. At least one level originates from an unresolved doublet. Among the states with a major \(\ensuremath \nu(d_{5/2}^{+1} p_{3/2}^{-1})\) component, only states with spins 1- and 3- are firmly identified. The comparison to previous data taken with semiconductor detectors reveals details of the structure of at least 18 states in the range 4.6 < E x < 6.4 MeV.

Keywords

Excitation Energy 208Pb Excitation Function Proton Decay Semiconductor Detector 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    M.J. Martin, Nucl. Data Sheets 108, 1583 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. Mairle, K. Schindler, P. Grabmayr, G.J. Wagner, U. Schmidt-Rohr, G.P.A. Berg, W. Hürlimann, S.A. Martin, J. Meissburger, J.G.H. Römer, B. Styczen, J.L. Tain, Phys. Lett. B 121, 307 (1983)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. Grabmayr, G. Mairle, U. Schmidt-Rohr, G.P.A. Berg, J. Meissburger, P. von Rossen, J.L. Tain, Nucl. Phys. A 469, 285 (1987)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J.P. Connelly, D.J. DeAngelis, J.H. Heisenberg, F.W. Hersman, W. Kim, M. Leuschner, T.E. Milliman, J. Wise, C.N. Papanicolas, Phys. Rev. C 45, 2711 (1992)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    B.D. Valnion, V. Yu. Ponomarev, Y. Eisermann, A. Gollwitzer, R. Hertenberger, A. Metz, P. Schiemenz, G. Graw, Phys. Rev. C 63, 024318 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Yeh, P.E. Garrett, C.A. McGrath, S.W. Yates, T. Belgya, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1208 (1996)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    E. Radermacher, M. Wilhelm, S. Albers, J. Eberth, N. Nicolay, H.G. Thomas, H. Tiesler, P. von Brentano, R. Schwengner, S. Skoda, G. Winter, K.H. Maier, Nucl. Phys. A 597, 408 (1996)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. Radermacher, M. Wilhelm, P. von Brentano, R.V. Jolos, Nucl. Phys. A 620, 151 (1997)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Schramm, K.H. Maier, M. Rejmund, L.D. Wood, N. Roy, A. Kuhnert, A. Aprahamian, J. Becker, M. Brinkman, D.J. Decman, E.A. Henry, R. Hoff, D. Manatt, L.G. Mann, R.A. Meyer, W. Stoeffl, G.L. Struble, T.-F. Wang, Phys. Rev. C 56, 1320 (1997)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. Belgya, B. Fazekas, Zs. Kasztovszky, Zs. Revay, G. Molnár, M. Yeh, P.E. Garrett, S.W. Yates, Phys. Rev. C 57, 2740 (1998)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    C.F. Moore, J.G. Kulleck, P. von Brentano, F. Rickey, Phys. Rev. 164, 1559 (1967)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. Richard, W.G. Weitkamp, W. Wharton, H. Wieman, P. von Brentano, Phys. Lett. B 26, 8 (1967)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    S.A.A. Zaidi, L.J. Parish, J.G. Kulleck, C.F. Moore, P. von Brentano, Phys. Rev. 165, 1312 (1968)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    W.R. Wharton, P. von Brentano, W.K. Dawson, P. Richard, Phys. Rev. 176, 1424 (1968)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    P. Richard, P. von Brentano, H. Wieman, W. Wharton, W.G. Weitkamp, W.W. McDonald, D. Spalding, Phys. Rev. 183, 1007 (1969)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    J.G. Kulleck, P. Richard, D. Burch, C.F. Moore, W.R. Wharton, P. von Brentano, Phys. Rev. C 2, 1491 (1970)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    H.-J. Glöckner, Master’s Thesis, Universität Heidelberg (1972) edited by A. Heusler, http://www.mpi-hd.mpg.de/personalhomes/hsl/HJG_diplom/
  18. 18.
    A. Heusler, G. Graw, R. Hertenberger, F. Riess, H.-F. Wirth, T. Faestermann, R. Krücken, J. Jolie, D. Mücher, N. Pietralla, P. von Brentano, Phys. Rev. C 74, 034303 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. Heusler, G. Graw, R. Hertenberger, F. Riess, H.-F. Wirth, T. Faestermann, R. Krücken, Th. Behrens, V. Bildstein, K. Eppinger, C. Herlitzius, O. Lepyoshkina, M. Mahgoub, A. Parikh, S. Schwertel, K. Wimmer, J. Jolie, D. Mücher, N. Pietralla, C. Scholl, P. von Brentano, Phys. Rev. C 82, 014316 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. Heusler, G. Graw, T. Faestermann, R. Hertenberger, H.-F. Wirth, R. Krücken, C. Scholl, P. von Brentano, Eur. Phys. J. A 44, 233 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    A. Heusler, T. Faestermann, R. Hertenberger, R. Krücken, H.-F. Wirth, P. von Brentano, Eur. Phys. J. A 46, 17 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    M. Löffler, H.J. Scheerer, H. Vonach, Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 111, 1 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    J. Ott, H. Angerer, T. von Egidy, R. Georgii, W. Schauer, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 367, 280 (1995)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    H.-F. Wirth, PhD Thesis, Technische Universität München (2001) http://tumb1.biblio.tu-muenchen.de/publ/diss/ph/2001/wirth.html
  25. 25.
    A. Heusler, G. Graw, R. Hertenberger, F. Riess, H.-F. Wirth, R. Krücken, P. von Brentano, Phys. Rev. C 75, 024312 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    J.P. Bondorf, P. von Brentano, P. Richard, Phys. Lett. B 27, 5 (1968)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    A. Heusler, P. von Brentano, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 75, 381 (1973)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
  29. 29.
    A. Heusler, H.L. Harney, J.P. Wurm, Nucl. Phys. A 135, 591 (1969)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.

Copyright information

© SIF, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Heusler
    • 1
    Email author
  • T. Faestermann
    • 2
  • G. Graw
    • 3
  • R. Hertenberger
    • 3
  • J. Jolie
    • 4
  • R. Krücken
    • 2
  • D. Mücher
    • 2
  • N. Pietralla
    • 5
  • C. Scholl
    • 4
  • V. Werner
    • 6
  • H. -F. Wirth
    • 3
  • P. von Brentano
    • 4
  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institut für KernphysikHeidelbergGermany
  2. 2.Physik Department E12Technische Universität MünchenGarchingGermany
  3. 3.Fakultät für PhysikLudwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenGarchingGermany
  4. 4.Institut für KernphysikUniversität zu KölnKölnGermany
  5. 5.Institut für KernphysikTechnische Universität DarmstadtDarmstadtGermany
  6. 6.WNSLYale UniversityNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations