Heavy element research at FLNR (Dubna)

  • Yu. Oganessian
Regular Article - Experimental Physics

Abstract

The setting of the experiments is described and the results obtained on the synthesis of the heaviest nuclides in reactions induced by 48Ca projectiles are presented. The decay properties of the new nuclei confirm the theoretical predictions about the new nuclear shells and the “islands of stability” of superheavy elements. Briefly, also the results of the first experiments aimed to study the atomic and chemical properties of element 112 are reported.

References

  1. 1.
    A.M. Brack et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 44, 320 (1972).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Sobiczewski, F.A. Gareev, B.N. Kalinkin, Phys. Lett. 22, 500 (1966).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. Meldner, Ark. Fys. 36, 593 (1967).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    U. Mosel, W. Greiner, Z. Phys. 222, 261 (1969).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. Möller, J.R. Nix, J. Phys. G 20, 1681 (1994).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    W. Greiner, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 5, (1995).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Sobiczewski, Phys. Part. Nucl. 25, 119 (1994).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. Smolanczuk, J. Skalski, A. Sobiczewski, Phys. Rev. C 52, 1871 (1995).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    G.N. Flerov et al., Nucl. Phys. A 267, 359 (1976).ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yu.Ts. Oganessian, Lect. Notes Phys. 33, 221 (1975).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Hofmann, Rep. Prog. Phys. 61, 639 (1998).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. Armbruster, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 35, 135 (1985).CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    G. Münzenberg, Rep. Prog. Phys. 51, 57 (1988).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. Hofmann, G. Münzenberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 733 (2000).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    K. Morita et al., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 73, 2593 (2004).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yu.Ts. Oganessian, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 34, R165 (2007).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yu.Ts. Oganessian et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3154 (1999); Phys. Rev. C 62, 041604 (R) (2000); Phys. Rev. C 63, 011301(R) (2001); Nucl. Phys. A 734, 109 (2004); Phys. Rev. C 72, 034611 (2005); Phys. Rev. C 74, 044602 (2006).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    S.N. Dmitriev et al., Mendeleev Commun. 1, 1 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    I. Muntian, Z. Patyk, A. Sobiczewski, Acta Phys. Pol. B 34, 2073 (2003); Phys. At. Nucl. 66, 1015 (2003).ADSGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    S. Goriely et al., Phys. Rev. C 66, 024326 (2002).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    K.S. Pitzer, J. Chem. Phys. 63, 1032 (1975).ADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    E. Eliav et al., Phys. Rev. A 52, 2765 (1995); M. Seth, P. Schwerdtfeger, M. Dolg, J. Chem. Phys. 106, 3623 (1997).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    V. Pershina et al., Radiochim. Acta 94, 181 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ch.E. Düllmann et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 479, 631 (2002); S. Soverna et al., Radiochim. Acta 93, 1 (2005).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    S. Hofmann et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 32, 251 (2007).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    R. Eichler et al., Nature 447, 72 (2007).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SIF, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yu. Oganessian
    • 1
  1. 1.Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear ReactionsJoint Institute for Nuclear ResearchMoscow regionRussia

Personalised recommendations