Advertisement

The European Physical Journal A

, Volume 41, Issue 3, pp 399–404 | Cite as

Polarization potentials due to inelastic excitations

  • K. RusekEmail author
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics

Abstract

Dynamic polarization potentials generated by inelastic excitations of the projectile or target nuclei for three scattering systems are compared. Effects due to excitations to bound/unbound states as well as due to different multipolarities are studied. It is shown that the potentials exhibit similar radial dependence at large projectile-target separations; real parts change with the increased radius from repulsive to attractive while imaginary parts, close to zero or even emissive at the nuclear surface, are becoming absorptive at large distances. This general tendency is a consequence of the interplay between Coulomb and nuclear forces.

PACS

25.70.Bc Elastic and quasielastic scattering 24.10.Eq Coupled-channel and distorted-wave models 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    W.G. Love, T. Teresawa, G.R. Satchler, Nucl. Phys. A 291, 183 (1977).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    W.Y. So, T. Ugadawa, K.S. Kim, S.W. Hong, B.T. Kim, Phys. Rev. C 76, 024613 (2007).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    W.Y So, T. Ugadawa, K.S. Kim, S.W. Hong, B.T. Kim, Phys. Rev. C 75, 024610 (2007).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R.S. Mackintosh, A.M. Kobos, Phys. Lett. B 116, 95 (1982).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Y. Sakuragi, Phys. Rev. C 35, 2161 (1987).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Athena Pakou, Phys. Rev. C 78, 067601 (2008).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Lubian, Nucl. Phys. A 791, 24 (2007).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A.A. Ioannides, R.S. Mackintosh, Phys. Lett. B 161, 43 (1985).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R.S. Mackintosh, N. Keeley, Phys. Rev. C 79, 014611 (2009).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    I. Martel, J. Gómez-Camacho, K. Rusek, G. Tungate, Nucl. Phys. A 641, 188 (1998).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    V.P. Verbitsky, K.O. Terenetsky, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 55, 363 (1992).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    L. Borowska, K. Terenetsky, V. Verbitsky, S. Fritzche, Phys. Rev. C 76, 034606 (2007).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    L. Borowska, K. Terenetsky, V. Verbitsky, S. Fritzche, Phys. Rev. C 79, 044605 (2009).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Gómez-Camacho, M.V. Andres, M.A. Nagarajan, Nucl. Phys. A 580, 156 (1994).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    K. Rusek, N. Keeley, K.W. Kemper, R. Raabe, Phys. Rev. C 67, 041604(R) (2003).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    R.S. Mackintosh, N. Keeley, Phys. Rev. C 70, 024604 (2004).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. Budzanowski, Phys. Lett. 11, 74 (1964).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    A.M. Sánchez-Ben’itez, Nucl. Phys. A 803, 30 (2008).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    N. Keeley, Nucl. Phys. A 571, 326 (1994).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    R.S. Mackintosh, K. Rusek, Phys. Rev. C 67, 034607 (2003).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    M.A. Franey, P.J. Ellis, Phys. Rev. C 23, 787 (1981).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    I.J. Thompson, M.A. Nagarajan, J.S. Lilley, M.J. Smithson, Nucl. Phys. A 505, 84 (1989).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    I.J. Thompson, Comput. Phys. Rep. 7, 167 (1988).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lynne McFadden, G.R. Satchler, Nucl. Phys. 84, 177 (1966).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    C.E. Bemis jr., F.K. McGowan, J.L.C. Ford jr., W.T. Milner, P.H. Stelson, R.L. Robinson, Phys. Rev. C 8, 1466 (1973).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    V. Avrigeanu, P.H. Hodgson, M. Avrigeanu, Phys. Rev. C 49, 2136 (1994).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    N. Keeley, K. Rusek, Phys. Lett. B 427, 1 (1998).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    B. Buck, A.C. Merchant, J. Phys. G 14, L211 (1988).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    A.M. Moro, K. Rusek, J.M. Arias, J. Gómez-Camacho, M. Rodriguez-Gallardo, Phys. Rev. C 75, 064607 (2007).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    V. Lapoux, Phys. Rev. C 66, 034608 (2002).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    V. Lapoux, Phys. Lett. B 658, 198 (2008).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yu.E. Penionzhkevich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 162701 (2006).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    L.R. Gasques, D.J. Hinde, M. Dasgupta, A. Mukherjee, R.G. Thomas, Phys. Rev. C 79, 034605 (2009).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    P.K. Rath, Phys. Rev. C 79, 051601(R) (2009).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    J. Lubian, T. Correa, P.R.S. Gomes, L.F. Canto, Phys. Rev. C 78, 064615 (2008).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© SIF, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Heavy Ion LaboratoryUniversity of WarsawWarsawPoland
  2. 2.The Andrzej Sołtan Institute for Nuclear StudiesWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations