Advertisement

The elastic pd scattering analyzing powers and spin correlation coefficients at Elab p = 135 and 200 MeV: Three-nucleon force and relativistic effects

  • H. Witała
  • R. Skibiński
  • J. Golak
  • W. Glöckle
  • A. Nogga
  • H. Kamada
Nuclear Structure and Reactions

Abstract.

The rich set of data for analyzing powers and spin correlation coefficients in pd elastic scattering at E lab p = 135 and 200 MeV taken at IUCF has been compared to theoretical predictions based on modern nuclear forces. To this aim the three-nucleon Faddeev equations have been solved with standard nucleon-nucleon potentials (AV18, CD Bonn, NijmI and II) alone or combined with the 2π-exchange Tucson-Melbourne three-nucleon force. For the AV18 potential also the Urbana IX three-nucleon interaction has been used. For some spin observables the addition of these three-nucleon forces improves the description of data whereas in other cases the description deteriorates. The relativistic effects for all studied spin observables have been investigated and found to be small. The conclusion is that significant parts of the three-nucleon force are missing.

PACS.

21.45.+v Few-body systems 24.70.+s Polarization phenomena in reactions 25.10.+s Nuclear reactions involving few-nucleon systems 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R.B. Wiringa, V.G.J. Stoks, R. Schiavilla, Phys. Rev. C 51, 38 (1995).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Machleidt, F. Sammarruca, Y. Song, Phys. Rev. C 53, R1483 (1996).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    V.G.J. Stoks, R.A.M. Klomp, C.P.F. Terheggen, J.J. de Swart, Phys. Rev. C 49, 2950 (1994).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S.A. Coon , Nucl. Phys. A 317, 242 (1979)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    B.S. Pudliner , Phys. Rev. C 56, 1720 (1997).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.L. Friar , Phys. Lett. B 311, 4 (1993).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Nogga, H. Kamada, W. Glöckle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 944 (2000)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    R.B. Wiringa, S.C. Pieper, J. Carlson, V.R. Pandharipande, Phys. Rev. C 62, 014001 (2000). CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S.C. Pieper, V.R. Pandharipande, R.B. Wiringa, J. Carlson, Phys. Rev. C 64, 014001 (2001).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S.C. Pieper, R.B. Wiringa, J. Carlson, Phys. Rev. C 70, 054325 (2004).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    H. Witała, W. Glöckle, D. Hüber, J. Golak, H. Kamada, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1183 (1998).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    W. Glöckle, H. Witała, D. Hüber, H. Kamada, J. Golak, Phys. Rep. 274, 107 (1996).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    K. Sekiguchi , Phys. Rev. C 65, 034003 (2002).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    H. Witała , Phys. Rev. C 63, 024007 (2001).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    W.P. Abfalterer , Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 57 (1998).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    H. Witała , Phys. Rev. C 59, 3035 (1999).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    K. Hatanaka , Phys. Rev. C 66, 044002 (2002).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    R.V. Cadman , Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 967 (2001).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    K. Sekiguchi , Phys. Rev. C 70, 014001 (2004).MathSciNetCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    K. Ermisch , Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5862 (2001).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    R. Bieber , Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 606 (2000).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    K. Ermisch , Phys. Rev. C 68, 051001(R) (2003).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    K. Ermisch , Phys. Rev. C 71, 064004 (2005).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    St. Kistryn, , Phys. Rev. C 72, 044006 (2005).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    H. Witała, J. Golak, W. Glöckle, H. Kamada, Phys. Rev. C 71, 054001 (2005).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    H. Witała, J. Golak, R. Skibiński, Phys. Lett. B 634, 374 (2006)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    H.O. Meyer, in Proceedings of the XV International Conference on Few-Body Problems in Physics, Groningen, The Netherlands, 22-26 July, 1997, edited by J.C.S. Bacelar, A.E.L. Dieperink, R.A. Malfliet, L.P. Kok (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1998) Nucl. Phys. A 361, 122c (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    B. v. Przewoski, nucl-ex/0411019Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    H. Witała, T. Cornelius, W. Glöckle, Few-Body Syst. 3, 123 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    D. Hüber, H. Kamada, H. Witała, W. Glöckle, Acta Phys. Pol. B 28, 1677 (1997).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    S.A. Coon, H.K. Han, Few-Body Syst. 30, 131 (2001).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    H. Kamada, W. Glöckle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2547 (1998).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    H. Kamada, W. Glöckle, J. Golak, Ch. Elster, Phys. Rev. C 66, 044010 (2002).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    E. Epelbaum, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 57, 654 (2006).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    S.A. Coon, M.T. Peña, Phys. Rev. C 48, 2559 (1993).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Società Italiana di Fisica and Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Witała
    • 1
  • R. Skibiński
    • 1
  • J. Golak
    • 1
  • W. Glöckle
    • 2
  • A. Nogga
    • 3
  • H. Kamada
    • 4
  1. 1.M. Smoluchowski Institute of PhysicsJagiellonian UniversityKrakówPoland
  2. 2.Institut für Theoretische Physik IIRuhr-Universität BochumBochumGermany
  3. 3.Institut für KernphysikForschungszentrum JülichJülichGermany
  4. 4.Department of Physics, Faculty of EngineeringKyushu Institute of TechnologyTobata, KitakyushuJapan

Personalised recommendations