Advertisement

Predictions of the residue cross-sections for the elements Z = 113 and Z = 114

  • B. Bouriquet
  • Y. Abe
  • G. Kosenko
Letter

Abstract.

A good reproduction of experimental excitation functions is obtained for the 1n reactions producing the elements with Z = 108, 110, 111 and 112 by the combined usage of the two-step model for fusion and the statistical decay code KEWPIE. Furthermore, the model provides reliable predictions of productions of the elements with Z = 113 and Z = 114 which will be a useful guide for plannings of experiments.

Keywords

Elementary Particle Excitation Function Reliable Prediction Good Reproduction Statistical Decay 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M.G. Mayer, J.H.D. Jensen, Elementary Theory of Nuclear Shell Structure (Wiley, New York, 1955).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A.T. Kruppa et al. , Phys. Rev. C 61, 034313 (2000); R. Smolanczuk, Phys. Rev. C 56, 812 (1999); S. Cwiok et al. , Nucl. Phys. A 611, 211 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. Möller et al. , At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 59, 185 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Hofmann, G. Münzenberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 733 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yu. Oganessian et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3154 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A.B. Quint et al. , Z. Phys. A 346, 119 (1993).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    W.J. Swiatecki, Phys. Scr. 24, 113 (1981).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    C.W. Shen et al. , Phys. Rev. C 66 061602(R) (2002); Y. Abe et al. , Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 146, 104 (2002).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    B. Bouriquet et al. , Comput. Phys. Commun. 159, 1 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    V.Yu. Denisov, S. Hofmann, Phys. Rev. C 61, 034606 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    G.G. Adamian et al. , Phys. Rev. C 69, 011601(R) (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D.H.E. Gross, H. Kalinowski, Phys. Rep. 45, 175 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    T. Wada et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3538 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Blocki et al. , Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 113, 330 (1978).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J.D. Bao, D. Boilley, Y. Abe, in preparation.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    K. Sato et al. , Z. Phys. A 290, 145 (1979).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    G. Kosenko et al. , J. Nucl. Radiochem. Sci. 3, 19 (2002).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    M.G. Itkis et al. , International Workshop on Fusion Dynamics at the Extremes, Dubna, 25-27 May, 2000, edited by Yu. Oganessian, V.I. Zagrebaev (World Scientific, 2001) p. 93.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    H.A. Kramers, Physica VII 4, 284 (1940); Y. Abe et al. , Phys. Rep. 275, Nos. 2 and 3 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    H. Koura et al. , Nucl. Phys. A 674, 47 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    W.D. Myers, W.J. Swiatecki, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 204, 401 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    A.V. Ignatyuk et al. , Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 21, 255 (1975).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    J. Töke, W.J. Swiatecki, Nucl. Phys. A 372, 141 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    W.J. Swiatecki , Acta Phys. Pol. B 34, 2049 (2003).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    K. Morita et al. , private communication.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin/Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Yukawa Institute for Theoretical PhysicsKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsUniversity of OmskOmskRussia

Personalised recommendations