Advertisement

A model for A = 3 antinuclei production in proton-nucleus collisions

  • R. P. Duperray
  • K. V. Protasov
  • L. Derome
  • M. Buénerd
Article

Abstract.

A simple coalescence model based on the same diagrammatic approach of antimatter production in hadronic collisions as used previously for antideuterons is used here for the hadroproduction of mass-3 antinuclei. It is shown that the model is able to reproduce the existing experimental data on the \(\overline{t}\) and \(\overline{^3\mbox{He}}\) production without any additional parameter.

Keywords

Experimental Data Additional Parameter Hadronic Collision Diagrammatic Approach Coalescence Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    See sect. IV in Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 113 (2002).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    O. Adrani , Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 478, 114 (2002).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R.P. Duperray, K.V. Protasov, A.Yu. Voronin, Eur. Phys. J. A 16, 27 (2003).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S.T. Butler, C.A. Pearson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 7, 69 (1961)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    See, for example, the classical paper by S. Nagamyia , Phys. Rev. C 24, 971 (1981) and Nucl. Phys. A 661 (1999) for recent references.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    V.M. Kolybasov, Yu.N. Sokol’skikh, Phys. Lett. B 225, 31 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. Chardonnet, J. Orloff, P. Salati, Phys. Lett. B 409, 313 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Y.M. Antipov , Phys. Lett. B 34, 164 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    N.K. Vishnevskii , Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 20, 371 (1974).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    W. Bozzoli , Nucl. Phys. B 144, 317 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Bussiére , Nucl. Phys. B 174, 1 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M.A. Braun, V.V. Vechernin, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 44, 506 (1986)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    I.S. Shapiro, Dispersion theory of direct nuclear reactions, in Selected Topics in Nuclear Theory, edited by F. Janouch (IAEA, Vienna, 1963)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Muslim, Y.E. Kim, Nucl. Phys. A 427, 235 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    F. James, Monte Carlo Phase Space, CERN 68-15 (1968)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. Appelquist , Phys. Lett. B 376, 245 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J.R. Letaw, R. Silberberg, C.H. Tsao, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 51, 271 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    F. Binon , Phys. Lett. B 30, 510 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yu.B. Bushnin , Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 10, 337 (1970).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    R.P. Duperray, C.Y. Huang, K.V. Protasov, M. Buénerd, to be published in Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003), astro-ph/0305274.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    W.F. Baker , Phys. Lett. B 51, 303 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    A.N. Kalinovskii, N.V. Mokhov, Yu.P. Nikitin, Passage of High-Energy Particles Through Matter (American Institute of Physics, New York, 1989).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin/Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. P. Duperray
    • 1
  • K. V. Protasov
    • 1
  • L. Derome
    • 1
  • M. Buénerd
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique et de CosmologieIN2P3-CNRS, UJFGGrenoble CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations