An introduction to the Generalized Parton Distributions

  • M. GarçonEmail author


The recently introduced concepts of Generalized Parton Distributions (GPD) are reviewed in an introductory and phenomenological fashion. These distributions provide a rich and unifying picture of the nucleon structure. Their physical meaning is discussed. The GPD are in principle measurable through exclusive deeply virtual production of photons (DVCS) or of mesons (DVMP). Experiments are starting to test the validity of these concepts. First results are discussed and new experimental projects presented, with an emphasis on this program at Jefferson Lab.


Physical Meaning Parton Distribution Experimental Project Nucleon Structure Virtual Production 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    M. Vanderhaeghen, P.A.M. Guichon, M. Guidal, Phys. Rev. D 60, 094017 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    B.W. Filippone, Xiandong Ji, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 26, 1 (2001).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. Goeke, M.V. Polyakov, M. Vanderhaeghen, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 47, 401 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A.V. Radyushkin, hep-ph/0101225.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A.V. Belitsky, D. Müller, A. Kirchner, Nucl. Phys. B 629, 323 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Vanderhaeghen, this issue, p. 429.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Burkardt, Phys. Rev. D 62, 071503(R) (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.P. Ralston, B. Pire, hep-ph/0110075Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A.V. Radyushkin, Phys. Rev. D 59, 014030 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    M.V. Polyakov, A.G. Shuvaev, hep-ph/0207153.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A.W. Thomas, this issue, p. 241.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    O.V. Teryaev, Phys. Lett. B 510, 125 (2001).CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    The Science Driving the 12 GeV Upgrade of CEBAF, Jefferson Lab report, February 2001.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    N. d’Hose, Letter of intent to the CSTS/SPhN-Saclay (2000), Scholar
  15. 15.
    Declaration of Ferrara, http: / / Scholar
  16. 16.
    HERMES Collaboration (A. Airapetian), Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 182001 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    CLAS Collaboration (S. Stepanyan), Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 182002 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    H1 Collaboration (C. Adloff), Phys. Lett. B 517, 47 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. Diehl, Phys. Lett. B 411, 193 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    G. van der Steenhoven, this issue, p. 377.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    V. Burkert, L. Elouadrhiri, M. Garçon, S. Stepanyan, CEBAF experiment 01-113.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    P. Bertin, C. Hyde-Wright, R. Ransome, F. Sabatié, CEBAF experiment 00-110.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    J.C. Collins, L. Frankfurt, M. Strikman, Phys. Rev. D 56, 2982 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    HERMES Collaboration (A. Airapetian), Eur. Phys. J. C 17, 389 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    C. Hadjidakis, private communication.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    M. Guidal, M. Garçon, E. Smith, CEBAF experiment 99-105.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin/Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DAPNIA/SPhNCEA-SaclayGif-sur-YvetteFrance

Personalised recommendations