Strangeness production and other recent results from Hall B at Jefferson Lab

Article

Abstract.

Recent results using the CLAS detector at Jefferson Lab are discussed. We emphasize strangeness photo- and electro-production in the baryon resonance region between W = 1.6 and 2.3 GeV, where indications of s-channel structure are suggestive of high-mass baryon resonances coupling to kaons and hyperons in the final state. Other CLAS results, for the E1 + /M1 + transition form factor at the first \(\Delta\)-resonance, two-pion electroproduction, and \(\eta\) photoproduction are also briefly mentioned.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    W. Brooks , Nucl. Phys. A 663, 1077 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M.D. Mestayer , Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 449, 81 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    E.S Smith , Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 432, 265 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. Adams , Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 465, 414 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Amarian , Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 460, 239 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Particle Data Group, Phys. Rev. D 66, 1 (2002).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Simon Capstick, W. Roberts, Phys. Rev. D 58, 1 (1998), and references therein.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    See for example: E. Klempt, nucl-ex/0203002.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    T. Mart, C. Bennhold, H. Haberzettl, L. Tiator, KaonMAID 2000 at www.kph.uni-mainz.de/MAID/kaon/ kaonmaid.html.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. Mart, C. Bennhold, Phys. Rev. C 61, 012201 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M.Q. Tran , Phys. Lett. B 445, 20 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Robert A. Williams, Cheung-Ryong Ji, Stephen R. Cotanch, Phys. Rev. C 46, 1617 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    B. Saghai, private communication. See also: J.C. David, C. Fayard, G.H. Lamot, B. Saghai, Phys. Rev. C 53, 2613 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Guidal, J.-M. Laget, M. Vanderhaegen, Nucl. Phys. A 627, 645 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Vanderhaegen, M. Guidal, J.-M. Laget, Phys. Rev. C 57, 1454 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. Janssen, J. Ryckebusch, D. Debruyne, T. Van Cauteren, Phys. Rev C 65, 015201 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    C. Bennhold, H. Haberzettl, T. Mart, in Proceedings of the 2nd ICTP International Conference on Perspectives in Hadron Physics, Trieste, Italy, 10-14 May 1999, edited by S. Boffi, C. Ciofi degli Atti, M. Giannini (World Scientific, Singapore, 2000), nucl-th/9909022.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    See for example: G. Knoechlein, D. Drechsel, L. Tiator, Zeit. Phys. A 352, 327 (1995).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    K. Joo , Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 122001 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. Dugger , Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 222002 (2002), www.public.asu.edu/ britchie/etaPRL.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    M. Ripani , in preparation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin/Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysicsCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations