Advertisement

pd scattering at 250 MeV and three-nucleon forces

  • K. HatanakaEmail author
  • J. Kamiya
  • Y. Maeda
  • T. Noro
  • K. Sagara
  • H. Sakai
  • Y. Sakemi
  • K. Sekiguchi
  • Y. Shimizu
  • A. Tamii
  • T. Wakasa
  • K. Yako
  • H. P. Yoshida
  • V. P. Ladygin
Article

Abstract.

We have measured angular distributions of the differential cross-section, the analyzingpower and all of the spin transfer coefficients K y y, K x x, K z x, K x z, and K z z for the pd elastic scattering at 250 MeV. These are the first measurements of a complete set of proton polarization observables for pd elastic scattering at intermediate energies. The present data are compared with theoretical predictions based on exact solutions of the three-nucleon Faddeev equations and modern realistic nucleon-nucleon potentials combined with three-nucleon forces (3NF), namely the Tucson-Melbourne (TM) 2\(\pi\)-exchange model, a modification thereof (TM’) closer to chiral symmetry, and the Urbana IX model.

Keywords

Exact Solution Transfer Coefficient Theoretical Prediction Angular Distribution Elastic Scattering 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R.B. Wiringa, Phys. Rev. C 51, 38 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Machleidt, Phys. Rev. C 53, R1483 (1996).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    V.G.J. Stoks, Phys. Rev. C 49, 2950 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S.A. Coon, M.T. Peña, Phys. Rev. C 48, 2559 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    B.S. Pudliner, Phys. Rev. C 56, 1720 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Fujita, H. Miyazawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 17, 360 (1957).MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. Witała, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1183 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    K. Sekiguchi, Phys. Rev. C 65, 034003 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    E.J. Stephenson, Phys. Rev. C 60, 061001(R) (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. Ermisch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5862 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    R.V. Cadman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 967 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. Rohdjeß, Phys. Rev. C 57, 2111 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    K. Hatanaka, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 384, 575 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    K. Hatanaka, to be published in IX Workshop on High Energy Spin Physiscs, Spin-01, Dubna, August 2-7, 2001 (The Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, JINR).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Fujiwara, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 422, 484 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    T. Kawabata, Phys. Rev. C 65, 064316 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    H. Kamada, private communication.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin/Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Hatanaka
    • 1
    Email author
  • J. Kamiya
    • 1
  • Y. Maeda
    • 2
  • T. Noro
    • 3
  • K. Sagara
    • 3
  • H. Sakai
    • 2
  • Y. Sakemi
    • 1
  • K. Sekiguchi
    • 2
  • Y. Shimizu
    • 1
  • A. Tamii
    • 2
  • T. Wakasa
    • 1
  • K. Yako
    • 2
  • H. P. Yoshida
    • 1
  • V. P. Ladygin
    • 4
  1. 1.Research Center for Nuclear PhysicsOsaka UniversityIbaraki, OsakaJapan
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsUniversity of TokyoBunkyo, TokyoJapan
  3. 3.Department of PhysicsKyushu UniversityHakozaki, FukuokaJapan
  4. 4.Joint Institute for Nuclear ResearchesDubnaRussia

Personalised recommendations