Skip to main content
Log in

Labor Markets in Resource-Type Regions: Shocks of 2020

  • SPATIAL FEATURES OF SECTORAL DEVELOPMENT
  • Published:
Regional Research of Russia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

How measures to contain the spread of COVID-19 impacted labor markets almost immediately became a particular subject of attention among researchers from different countries. Already in mid-2020, estimates of the scale and consequences of pandemic shocks appeared both at the national and subnational levels. This study suggests that the shocks to which labor markets reacted in 2020 include not only restrictive measures to curb the spread of COVID-19, but also shocks to the commodity market, which had independent significance. The objective of the article is to characterize the reactions of labor markets in Russian resource-type regions to the 2020 crisis. The empirical base is comprised of Federal Service for State Statistics (Rosstat) data characterizing the state of the regional labor market by months and quarters of 2020 compared to the corresponding period in 2019. The study confirms that traditional mechanisms of corrections to the Russian labor market worked, primarily flexibility of working hours. State regulation contributed, on the one hand, to curbing the decline in employment and growth in unemployment, and on the other hand, to an increase in the level of registered unemployment. At the same time, regional labor markets reacted differently to the shocks of 2020 due to the different influence of particular recession factors, as well as different impacts of institutional changes in employment regulation. Differences in responses to the shocks of 2020 in the labor markets of resource-type regions with different levels of resource dependence are revealed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation. On the dynamics of industrial production. January 2021. https://www.economy.gov.ru/material/file/3fd9c6-cac43e98899dd5fd072b43a569/20210125.pdf.

  2. See also: Gimpelson, V.E., How the pandemic affected Russian unemployment estimates. https://www.rbc.ru/newsp-aper2020/ 06/26/ 5ef06fef9a79478939a1e832. Accessed December 9, 2021.

  3. See also: Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation. On industrial production dynamics. January 2021. https://www.economy.gov.ru/material/file/3fd9c-6cac43e98899dd5fd072b43a569/20210125.pdf.

  4. In Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug, a registry of best practices for combating the spread of new coronavirus infection was formed. https://depprirod.admhmao.ru/vse-novosti/4391429/.

  5. Unemployment benefits in Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug: Who can count on what amount? https://vest-niksr.ru/news/ 30950-posobie-po-bezrabotice-v-yugre-kto-i-na-kakuyu-summu-mozhet-rasschityvat.html.

  6. In the article, the borders of Russia are considered in accordance with the Constitution of the Russian Federation adopted by popular vote on December 12, 1993, with amendments approved during the All-Russian vote on July 1, 2020.

REFERENCES

  1. Bell, D. and Blanchflower, D., US and UK labour markets before and during the Covid-19 crash, Natl. Inst. Econ. Rev., 2020, no. 252, pp. R52–R69. https://doi.org/10.1017/nie.2020.14

  2. Borland, J. and Charlton, A., The Australian labour market and the early impact of Covid-19: An assessment, Aust. Econ. Rev., 2020, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 297–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8462.12386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. “Chernyi lebed’” v beloi maske: Analiticheskii doklad NIU VShE k godovshchine pandemii COVID-19 (“Black Swan” in a White Mask: HSE Analytical Report on the Anniversary of the COVID-19 Pandemic), Plaksin, S.M., Zhulin, A.B., and Farizova, S.A., Eds., Moscow: Vyssh. Shk. Ekon., 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  4. David, A.C. and Pienknagura, S., On the effectiveness of containment measures in controlling the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of labour market characteristics and governance, Appl. Econ. Lett., 2021, vol. 28, no. 19, pp. 1641–1647. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2020.1841082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Forsythe, E., Kahn, L., Lange, F., and Wiczer, D., Labor demand in the time of COVID-19: Evidence from vacancy postings and UI claims, J. Publ. Econ., 2020, no. 189, pp. 1641–1647.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104238

  6. Groshen, E.L., COVID-19’s impact on the U.S. labor market as of September 2020, Bus. Econ., 2020, no. 55, pp. 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1057/s11369-020-00193-1

  7. Hoehn-Velasco, L., Silverio-Murillo, A., and Balmori de la Miyar, J., The long downturn: The impact of the great lockdown on formal employment, J. Econ. Busi., 2021, vol. 115, p. 105983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2021.105983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kapelyushnikov, R.I., Anatomy of the coronacrisis through the lens of the labor market, preprint of Higher School of Economics, Moscow, 2021, no. WP3/2021/09.

  9. Kopytok, V.K. and Kuz’mina, Yu.V., Bezrabotitsa vremen COVID-19: chto mogut rasskazat’ administrativnye dannye? (Unemployment During COVID-19: What Can Administrative Data Tell?), Moscow: Tsentr Perspekt. Upr. Reshenii, 2020.

  10. Kurbatova, M.V. and Donova, I.V., Labor markets of resource type regions, J. Econ. Regulation (Vopr. Regulirovaniya Ekon.), 2021, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 105–120.

  11. Kurbatova, M.V., Levin, S.N., Kagan, E.S., and Kislitsyn, D.V., Resource-type regions in Russia: Definition and classification, Terra Economicus, 2019, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 8–23.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lee, S., Schmidt-Klau, D., and Verick, S., The labour market impacts of the COVID-19: A global perspective, Indian J. Labour Econ., 2020, no. 63, pp. 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-020-00249-y

  13. Obshchestvo i pandemiya: opyt i uroki bor’by s COVID-19 v Rossii (Society and the Pandemic: Experience and Lessons from the Fight against COVID-19 in Russia), Moscow, 2020.

  14. Shuai X., Chmura, C. and Stinchcomb, J., COVID-19, labor demand, and government responses: Evidence from job posting data, Bus. Econ., 2021, no. 56, pp. 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1057/s11369-020-00192-2

  15. Su, C., Dai, K., Ullah, S., and Andlib, Z., COVID-19 pandemic and unemployment dynamics in European economies, Econ. Res.Ekon. Istrazivanja, 2021, no. 5, pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2021.1912627

  16. Zubarevich, N.V., Pandemic and regions: Results of January−August 2020, Monitoring ekonomicheskoi situatsii v Rossii (Monitoring of the Economic Situation in Russia), 2020, vol. 129, no. 27, pp. 8–12.

  17. Zubarevich, N.V., Regional economies in 2020: The pandemic created problems in resource-producing regions and large cities, Monitoring ekonomicheskoi situatsii v Rossii (Monitoring of the Economic Situation in Russia), 2021, vol. 138, no. 6, pp. 13–16.

Download references

Funding

The study was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 19-010-00244 “Institutional Setup of the Labor Market in Resource-Type Regions”).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to M. V. Kurbatova or I. V. Donova.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kurbatova, M.V., Donova, I.V. Labor Markets in Resource-Type Regions: Shocks of 2020. Reg. Res. Russ. 13, 252–259 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970523700600

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970523700600

Keywords:

Navigation