Skip to main content
Log in

Large Russian Cities and Their Suburbs as Centers of Attraction for Internal Migrants

  • URBAN STUDIES
  • Published:
Regional Research of Russia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Large cities and their suburbs are the main centers of attraction for internal Russian migrants, pulling population from peripheral territories. Based on detailed data on internal Russian migration for 2011–2020, the scale of net migration is estimated in Moscow, St. Petersburg, and five groups of cities with populations of 100 000 inhabitants or more, and their suburbs. The size of the suburbs depends on the populations of the cities: the larger the population, the father the distance the cities extend their influence and, accordingly, the larger the radius of allocation of suburbs. The number of inhabitants of cities and their suburbs is determined from 2010 census data, and based on the distance from the city center, near, middle, and far suburbs are distinguished. It is estimated that 89.6 mln people lived in major cities and their suburbs (2010). The population concentration process has continued. The migration growth of large cities and their suburbs is comparable in size, but suburban growth is significantly larger in intensity. The suburbs of regional capitals and largest cities have the most intensive migration growth. The nearest suburbs of cities grow the most intensively owing to migration. Every year, large cities lose 40 000–50 000 people in migration with their suburbs. We are disinclined to consider this evidence of suburbanization; the main role is played by city sprawl and the attractiveness of living in the zone of maximum transport accessibility to city centers. Migration in the suburbs of Moscow and St. Petersburg deserves further study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Notes

  1. This data is not publicly accessible, provided by A.E. Raisikh.

REFERENCES

  1. Antonov, E.V. and Makhrova, A.G., Largest urban agglomerations and forms of settlement pattern at the supra-agglomeration level in Russia, Reg. Res. Russ., 2019, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 370–382. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970519040038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Breslavskii, A.S., Nezaplanirovannye prigorody: sel’sko-gorodskaya migratsiya i rost Ulan-Ude v postsovetskii period (Unplanned Suburbs: Rural–Urban Migration and the Growth of Ulan-Ude in the Post-Soviet Period), Ulan-Ude: Buryat. Nauchn. Tsentr Sib. Otdel. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2014.

  3. Breslavskii, A.S., Who studies the suburbs of big cities in contemporary Russia and how?, Gorod. Issled. Prakt., 2020, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 16–34. https://doi.org/10.17323/usp54202016-34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chudinovskikh, O.S., On revision of the UN Recommendations on Statistics of Migration (1998) and the Russian context, Vopr. Statist., 2019, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 61–76. https://doi.org/10.34023/2313-6383-2019-26-8-61-76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dieleman, F. and Wegener, M., Compact city and urban sprawl, Built Envir., 2004, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 308–323. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.30.4.308.57151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fielding, A.J., Counterurbanisation in Western Europe, Progress Plan., 1982, vol. 17, pp. 1–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fielding, A.J., Migration and social mobility: South East England as an escalator region, Reg. Stud., 1992, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Grigorichev, K.V., Diversity of the suburb: Suburbanization in Siberian region (the case of Irkutsk, Gorod. Issled. Prakt., 2016, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 7–23. https://doi.org/10.17323/usp1220167-23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hansen, H.K. and Aner, L.G., On the location dynamics of highly educated people migrating to peripheral regions of Denmark, Population, Space and Place, 2017, vol. 23, no. 8, e2076. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jiang, L. and O’Neill, B.C., Determinants of urban growth during demographic and mobility transitions: Evidence from India, Mexico, and the US, Population Dev. Rev., 2018, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 363–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Karachurina, L.B., Urbanization and suburbanization: Which one determines population migration in Moscow oblast?, Vestn. S.-Peterb. Univ. Nauki o Zemle, 2022, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 360–381. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu07.2022.208

  12. Karachurina, L.B. and Mkrtchyan, N.V., Intraregional population migration in Russia: Suburbs outperform capitals, Reg. Res. Russ., 2021, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970521010068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Karachurina, L.B., Mkrtchyan, N.V., and Petrosyan, A.N., Spatial patterns of net migration in the suburbs of Russian regional centers, Vestn. Mosk. Univ. Ser. 5. Geogr., 2021, no. 6, pp. 123–134.

  14. Khorev, B.S., The role of commuting migration in the relationship between urban and rural settlement pattern and the main tasks of its regulation, in Problemy rasseleniya v SSSR (Problems of Settlement Pattern in the USSR), Moscow: Statistika, 1980, pp. 222–234.

  15. Kley, S. and Drobnič, S., Does moving for family nest-building inhibit mothers’ labour force (re-)entry?, Demogr. Res., 2019, vol. 40, pp. 155–184. https://doi.org/10.4054/DEMRES.2019.40.7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kooiman, N., Residential mobility of couples around family formation in the Netherlands: Stated and revealed preferences, Population, Space and Place, 2020, vol. 26, no. 8, e2367. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kowalczyk, C., Kil, J., and Kurowska, K., Dynamics of development of the largest cities — evidence from Poland, Cities, 2019, vol. 89, pp. 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Křížková, I. and Ouředníček, M., Immigrant internal migration in a new destination country: Do immigrants suburbanise in Czechia and why? Population, Space and Place, 2020, vol. 26, no. 7, e2326. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kurichev, N.K. and Kuricheva, E.K., Regional differentiation of buyers’ activity in the primary housing market of the Moscow agglomeration, Reg. Res. Russ., 2018, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 322–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Makhrova, A.G., The organized cottage settlements: New type of settlements (on the example of the Moscow area), Reg. Issled., 2008, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Makhrova, A.G. and Kirillov, P.L., The “housing dimension” of contemporary urbanization in Russia, Reg. Issled., 2014, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 134–144.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Makhrova, A.G. and Babkin, R.A., Analysis of Moscow agglomeration settlement system pulsations based on data from mobile network operators, Reg. Issled., 2018, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 68–78.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Makhrova, A.G. and Babkin, R.A., Methodological approaches to the delimitation of the boundaries of the Moscow agglomeration based on data from mobile network operators, Reg. Res. Russ., 2019, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 373–380. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970520030090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Makhrova, A.G., Nefedova, T.G., and Treivish, A.I., Moskovskaya oblast’ segodnya i zavtra: tendentsii i perspektivy prostranstvennogo razvitiya (Moscow Oblast Today and Tomorrow: Trends and Prospects for Spatial Development), Moscow: Novyi Khronograf, 2008.

  25. Mkrtchyan, N.V. and Gilmanov, R.I., Moving up: Migration between levels of the settlement hierarchy in Russia in the 2010s, Reg. Res. Russ., 2023, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 305–315. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970523700727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nefedova, T.G. and Treivish, A.I., Cities and countryside in Russia: Their state and correlation, Reg. Issled., 2010, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 42–57.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Newbold, K.B., Migration up and down Canada’s urban hierarchy, Can. J. Urban Res., 2011, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 131–149.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Plane, D.A., Henriec, C.J., and Perry, M.J., Migration up and down the urban hierarchy and across the life course, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. United States Am. (PNAS), 2005, vol. 102, no. 43, pp. 15313–15318. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507312102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Raisikh, A.E., Defining the boundaries of urban agglomerations: Problems, international experience, solutions and results, Demogr. Obozr., 2020, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 27–53. https://doi.org/10.17323/demreview.v7i1.10819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rodrigo-Comino, J., Egidi, G., Sateriano, A., Mosconi, E.M., and Morera, A.G., Suburban fertility and metropolitan cycles: Insights from European cities, Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sandow, E. and Lundholm, E., Which families move out from metropolitan areas? Counterurban migration and professions in Sweden, Eur. Urban Reg. Stud., 2020, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 276–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776419893017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Vobecká, J. and Piguet, V., Fertility, natural growth, and migration in the Czech Republic: An urban–suburban–rural gradient analysis of long-term trends and recent reversals, Population, Space and Place, 2012, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Watt, P., Living in an Oasis: Middle-class disaffiliation and selective belonging in an English suburb, Envir. Plan. A, 2009, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 2874–2892. https://doi.org/10.1068/a41120

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank A.E. Raisikh for providing data on population size by settlements and their spatial referencing.

Funding

The article was prepared within the Basic Research Program of the National Research University Higher School of Economics.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to N. V. Mkrtchyan or R. I. Gilmanov.

Ethics declarations

The authors of this work declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note.

Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mkrtchyan, N.V., Gilmanov, R.I. Large Russian Cities and Their Suburbs as Centers of Attraction for Internal Migrants. Reg. Res. Russ. 14, 14–24 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970523600324

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970523600324

Keywords:

Navigation