Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Are Backwaters Homogeneous: the Vologda–Kostroma Borderland

  • RURAL STUDIES
  • Published:
Regional Research of Russia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract—

The article examines a belt of municipal districts on the border of Kostroma and Vologda oblasts—a territory that simultaneously belongs to the periphery of both regions, the periphery of economic areas and modern federal districts, and the “inner periphery” of European Russia. These territories are part of the old-developed Non-Chernozem Zone, characterized by rapid depopulation and shrinkage of the developed space. The aim of the study is to identify the spatial differentiation of districts along the border and its role in the formation of differences between territories. Various methods were used: study of historical maps, analysis of modern statistics, qualitative sociology methods, and field observations. The study showed the predominantly barrier function of the regional border, largely due to physical and geographical reasons: the watershed of the Volga and White Sea basins and the configuration of rivers along which local systems of rural settlement and transport corridors were historically formed. The historical multidirectionality of the spatial gravity of districts on different sides of the border, combined with institutional barriers, led to differentiation of economic and social processes in municipal districts. Thus, the socioeconomic indicators of the territories on the Vologda side of the border are generally more prosperous and differ less from each other than on the Kostroma side. The study also revealed the extremely important role that interregional routes could play. With a general trend towards a decrease in the rural population and fragmentation of the local economy, the territories on both sides of the border are heterogeneous and different combinations of functions of place are forming. At the same time, it is premature to classify the belt of territory peripheral to many centers as a zone of a spontaneously emerging natural reserve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

Notes

  1. Isachenko, A.G., Landscape Map, in Ecological Atlas of Russia. https://landscapeedu.ru/images/maps/fgr/ecorusatlas_landscapes.jpg (accessed August 21, 2023).

  2. Support farmer within the framework of the law, Association of Peasant Household Farms and Agricultural Cooperatives of Russia. https://www.akkor.ru/en/node/3755 (accessed August 21, 2023).

REFERENCES

  1. Averkieva, K.V., Intra-rural migration of the population and local processes of transformation of rural areas in the forest zone of the old-developed Non-Chernozem Region, Krest’yanovedenie, 2021, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 90–110. https://doi.org/10.31857/S2587556621060066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Averkieva, K.V., Nothing but depopulation? Lateral rural migration in the old-developed forest Non-Chernozem territories, Reg. Res. Russ., 2021, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 613–624. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970521040201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baranskii, N.N., Ekonomicheskaya geografiya SSSR: obzor po oblastyam Gosplana (Economic Geography of the USSR: Overview of the Regions of the State Planning Committee), Moscow; Leningrad, 1927.

  4. Beick, B. and Lang, T., Re-thinking non-core regions: Planning strategies and practices beyond growth, Eur. Plan. Stud., 2017, vol. 2, no. 26, pp. 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.136339810.1080/09654313.2017.1363398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Geograficheskie granitsy (Geographical Borders), Rodoman, B.B. and Ekkel’, B.M., Eds., Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1982.

  6. Kaganskii, V.L., Limological studies (results of the author’s research in general and geographical limology over 40 years), Reg. Issled., 2022, no. 3, pp. 5–22. https://doi.org/10.5922/1994-5280-2022-3-1

  7. Kaganskii, V.L., Inner periphery is a new growing zone of Russia’s cultural landscape, Reg. Res. Russ., 2013, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kalutskov, V.N., Russian North: Regional cultural landscape and its centuries-old cycles, Izv. Russ. Geogr. O‑va, 2005, no. 5, pp. 43–57.

  9. Kaplin, V.N., Sovereign’s road. https://litresp.ru/chitat/ru/K/kaplin-vadim-nikolaevich/gosudareva-doroga/15. Cited August 4, 2023.

  10. Karachurina, L.B. and Mkrtchyan, N.V., The role of migration in enhancing settlement pattern contrasts at the municipal level in Russia, Reg. Res. Russ., 2016, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 332–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kolosov, V.A., Border studies: Development of the theory and major trends in a changing, Reg. Res. Russ., 2023, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 652–662. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970523700946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kühn, M., Peripheralization: Theoretical concepts explaining socio-spatial inequalities, Eur. Plan. Stud., 2013, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 367–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.862518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kuz’minov, I.F., Socio-economic challenges to the timber industry in the North-European part of Russia (case study of Kostroma oblast), Reg. Res. Russ., 2011, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 41–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nefedova, T.G., Polarization of socio-economic space and prospects for rural areas in the old-developed regions of the Center of Russia, Krest’yanovedenie, 2021, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 126–153. https://doi.org/10.22394/2500-1809-2021-6-1-126-153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nefedova, T.G., Treivish, A.I., and Sheludkov, A.V., Spatially uneven development in Russia, Reg. Res. Russ., 2022, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 4–19.https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970522020071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Oikumena Blizhnego Severa Rossii: kollektivnaya monografiya (Ecumene of the Near North of Russia: Collective Monograph), Pokrovskii, N.E. and Nefedova, T.G., Eds., Moscow: Univ. Kniga, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pshenitsyn, D.A., Soligalichskii torgovyi trakt, ili Istoriya volosti Tolshma (XVII–XX vv.): Tolshmenskoe sel’skoe poselenie, Totemskii raion Vologodskoi oblasti (Soligalichsky Trade Tract, or History of the Tolshma Volost (17th–20th Centuries): Tolshmensky Rural Settlement, Totemsky District of Vologda oblast), Arkhangelsk: Lotsiya, 2019.

  18. Rodoman, B.B., Ecological potential of administrative borders, Reg. Issled., 2022, no. 3, pp. 54–59. https://doi.org/10.5922/1994-5280-2022-3-5

  19. Severo-Zapad RSFSR. Ekonomiko-geograficheskaya kharakteristika (Northwest of the RSFSR. Economic and Geographical Characteristics), Moscow: Mysl’, 1964.

  20. Shuvalov, V.E., Functions of borders and delimitation of the basic concepts of theoretical limology, Reg. Res. Russ., 2023, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970523701034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Soldatova, N.V., Dinamika rasseleniya Vologodskoi oblasti vo vtoroi polovine XX – nachale XXI veka (Dynamics of Settlement Pattern of Vologda Oblast in the Second Half of the 20th–Early 21st Centuries), Vologda: Vologod. Gos. Ped. Univ., 2010.

  22. Staroosvoennye raiony v prostranstve Rossii: istoriya i sovremennost’ (Old-Developed Areas in Russian Space: History and Modernity), Nefedova, T.G. and Starikova, A.V., Eds., Moscow: KMK, 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tarkhov, S.A., Administrative-territorial division of Russia in the 18th–20th centuries, Otechestv. Zap., 2002, no. 6, pp. 118–125.

  24. Vendina, O.I. and Zinov’ev, A.S., Borderland and peripherality: On the question of the context of the formation of Kaliningrad identity, Mir Rossii, 2022, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 118–143. https://doi.org/10.17323/1811-038X-2022-31-2-118-143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Volgo−Vyatskii raion. Ekonomiko-geograficheskaya kharakteristika (Volgo−Vyatsky Area. Economic and Geographical Characteristics), Matveev, G.P., Privalovskaya, G.A., and Khorev, B.S., Eds., Moscow: Geografgiz, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhivopisnaya Rossiya. Otechestvo nashe v ego zemel’nom, istoricheskom, plemennom, ekonomicheskom i bytovom znachenii, T.6: Moskva i Moskovskaya promyshlennaya oblast’, (Picturesque Russia. Our Fatherland in Its Land, Historical, Tribal, Economic and Household Significance, vol. 6: Moscow and the Moscow Industrial Region), Semenov, P.P., Ed., Moscow; St. Petersburg, 1898, pt. 1.

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank Aleksander Vepritsky, Oleg Krutov, and Natalya Grelya for their assistance in conducting expeditionary research, as well as Aleksei Zaitsev and Aleksei Novosyolov for consultations.

Funding

The study was financially supported by the Russian Science Foundation (grant no. 21-17-00112).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

    K. V. Averkieva & F. V. Zernov

  2. National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia

    K. V. Averkieva & F. V. Zernov

Authors
  1. K. V. Averkieva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. F. V. Zernov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. V. Averkieva.

Ethics declarations

The authors of this work declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note.

Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Averkieva, K.V., Zernov, F.V. Are Backwaters Homogeneous: the Vologda–Kostroma Borderland. Reg. Res. Russ. 13 (Suppl 1), S65–S77 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S207997052360018X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S207997052360018X

Keywords:

Search

Navigation