Skip to main content
Log in

Modern Russian Borderlands: Problems of Study and Some Conclusions

  • CHALLENGES AND POLICY OF SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT OF POST-SOVIET RUSSIA
  • Published:
Regional Research of Russia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A comparative analysis has been carried out on the demographic and socioeconomic dynamics of the border regions of Russia and neighboring countries, and the nature, mechanisms, and institutions of cross-border cooperation. The theoretical basis of the article is the concept of bordering, according to which border studies focus on the constant process of change in the regime, functions, and social significance of borders as a result of shifts in the international situation and bilateral relations, the exchange rate and global prices, the daily activities of political institutions, and interaction practices. Most border regions on both sides of borders are characterized by low per capita GRP with respect to the average values for their countries. A noticeable asymmetry in the ratio of exports and imports has developed in the trade of Russia’s border regions with its neighbors, especially in border areas with China due to its narrow specialization in raw materials export. The intensity of cross-border ties depends not so much on proximity to the border, but on the position of a population center in the regional center–periphery system. At the same time, the relationship between the “transparency” of the border and intensity of cross-border contacts is far from straightforward. They are governed not only by economic and other material reasons, but also by subjective factors at the national and regional levels. Attitudes towards neighbors are influenced by stereotypes of public opinion. During the entire post-Soviet period, Russian political discourse on relations with neighboring countries focused on the balance between the conditional Western and Eastern (Eurasian) vector, but it has undergone fundamental changes. Since the 2010s, Eurasian integration has appeared as one of the forms of Russian–Western rivalry. The redistribution of contact and barrier functions between borders with post-Soviet countries began to be interpreted as a result of their choice between association with the EU and participation in Eurasian integration projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Fedorov, G.M., Kaliningrad dilemma: “Development corridor” or double periphery? Geopolitical factor in the development of the Russian exclave in the Baltic, Balt. Reg., 2010, no. 2, pp. 5–15.

  2. Fedorov, G.M., Zverev, Yu.M., Korneevets, V.S., Rossiya na Baltike: 1990–2012 gody (Russia in the Baltic: 1990–2012), Kaliningrad: Balt. Fed. Univ. im. I. Kanta, 2013.

  3. Gritsenko, A.A., Perception of neighbors in Crimean border towns after 2014, Reg. Issled., 2018, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 109–114.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Karpenko, M.S. and Sebentsov, A.B., Demographic and socio-cultural challenges to cross-border cooperation at the Russian-Kazakhstani border, Vestn. S.-Peterb. Univ., Nauki Zemle, 2022, vol. 67, no 3, pp. 454–474.

  5. Kolosov, V., The vision of Europe and the world as seen by large powers: The case of BRIC countries, Geogr. Pol., 2015, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 89–98.

  6. Kolosov, V.A., The paradoxes of globalization and the new “fencing” of the state territory in the modern world, Reg. Issled., 2018, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kolosov, V., Phantom borders: The role in territorial identity and the impact on society, Belgeo [Online], 2020, no. 2. https://doi.org/10.4000/belgeo.38812

  8. Kolosov, V. and Morachevskaya, K., The role of an open border in the development of peripheral border regions: The case of Russian-Belarusian borderland, J. Borderl. Stud., 2022, vol. 37, pp. 533–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2020.1806095

  9. Kolosov, V. and Scott, J.W., Karelia: A Finnish–Russian borderland on the edge of neighbourhood, in The EU-Russia Borderland: New Contexts for Regional Cooperation, Eskelinen, H, liikanen, I., and Scott, J.W., Eds., London: Routledge, 2012, pp. 194–221.

  10. Kolosov, V.A. and Sebentsov, A.B., Russian borderlands: Contemporary problems and challenges, Reg. Sci. Policy Pract., 2020, vol. 12, pp. 671–687. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12285

  11. Kolosov, V.A., Zotova, M.V., Popov, F.A., Gritsenko, A.A., and Sebentsov, A.B., Post-Soviet borderland of Russia between East and West (analysis of political discourse). Part I. Looking to the West, Polis. Polit. Issled., 2018a, no. 3, pp. 42–59.

  12. Kolosov, V.A., Zotova, M.V., Popov, F.A., Gritsenko, A.A., Sebentsov, A.B., Post-Soviet borderland of Russia between East and West (analysis of political discourse). Part II. Looking to the East, Polis. Polit. Issled., 2018b, no. 5, pp. 57–69.

  13. Konrad, V., Toward a theory of borders in motion, J. Borderl. Stud., 2015, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 1–17.

  14. Laine, Yu., Perception of Russia in the public mind of Finland, Sravnit. Politika, 2017, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 123–139.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Luostarinen, H., Finnish Russophobia: The story of an en-emy image, J. Peace Res., 1989, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 123–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Morachevskaya, K.A. and Karpenko, M.S., Influence of Eurasian integration on economic interaction in the Russia–Belarus and Russia–Kazakhstan border areas, Reg. Issled., 2018, no. 3, pp. 92–100.

  17. Rossiiskoe pogranich’e: vyzovy sosedstva (Russian Borderland: Neighborhood Challenges), Kolosov, V.A., Ed., Moscow: IP I.I. Matushkina, 2018.

  18. Scott, J.W., Introduction to a research agenda for border studies, in A Research Agenda for Border Studies, Scott, J.W., Ed., London: Edward Elgar, 2020a, pp. 3−26.

  19. Scott, J.W., Introduction: Bordering, ordering, othering (almost) twenty years? Tijdscr. Econ. Soc. Geogr., 2020b, vol. 112, pp. 2–8.

  20. Vendina, O.I., Cities on the border: A test of ethnocultural diversity. Part 1, Gorod. Issled. Prakt., 2016, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 7–30.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vendina, O.I. and Gritsenko, A.A., The cultural landscape of the borderlands and the struggle for the symbolic resources of statement of sovereignty, in V fokuse naslediya (In the Focus of Heritage), Kuleshova, M.E., Ed., Moscow: Inst. Geogr. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2017, pp. 400–418.

  22. Zotova, M.V., Gritsenko, A.A., and Sebentsov, A.B., Everyday life in the Russian borderlands: Motives and factors of cross-border practices, Mir Ross., 2018, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 56–77.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zotova, M.V., Kolosov, V.A., Gritsenko, A.A., Sebentsov, A.B., and Karpenko, M.S., Territorial gradients of socioeconomic development of Russia’s borderland, Reg. Res. Russ., 2019, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 32–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation project “Effects and Functions of Borders in the Spatial Organization of Russian Society: Country, Region, Municipality”, no. 22-17-00263. The analysis of borders’ influence on the center-periphery patterns and the perception by residents of the borderlands of neighboring countries was prepared with partial support of the state assignment of the Institute of Geography of the Russian Academy of Sciences AAAA-A19-119022190170-1 (FMGE-2019-0008).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. A. Kolosov.

Ethics declarations

The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kolosov, V.A. Modern Russian Borderlands: Problems of Study and Some Conclusions. Reg. Res. Russ. 13, 58–64 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970522700502

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970522700502

Keywords:

Navigation